Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Blogs
Shop Horizontal
  1. Old Comment
    TheOak's Avatar

    Sanity Zone 1- 24 - 2014 Just Plain Mean

    This entire Nation has failed itself in respect to accountability. Even in the case of Christie, someone took the fall but it was not the top of the food chain. The double standard between the private sector and politicians is bathed in hypocrisy.

    When foul play was found at Enron, Skilling was held accountable. When foul play was found in Christies administration a lamb was sacrificed. The higher up you go in the political food chain the less accountability is held as evident by no one being held accountable for the IRS/Tea Party scandal, Benghazi, etc...
    permalink
    Posted 01-27-2014 at 08:03 AM by TheOak TheOak is offline
  2. Old Comment
    xan's Avatar

    Sanity Zone 1- 24 - 2014 Just Plain Mean

    I think there are a couple of key differences between the Christie Bridge and the IRS 501c4 scandals.
    • The Christie top staff conceived and initiated the bridge program without authority or notice.
    • The Congress gave the authority to the IRS to make determinations, and the actions taken were conceived and initiated by an admitted "conservative Republican" the Cincinnati field office.
      -
    • The CB initiative was political retribution for not supporting the "bipartisan governor"
    • The IRS initiative was a "shortcut" to determine if applicants were trying to gain undeserved tax exempt status as Congress cut the budget for the staff performing this work. Evidence suggests that conservative, liberal and progressive identified political applicants were given extra scrutiny, though anti-tax, Israel, and Occupy applications got more frequent scrutiny.
      -
    • The result of the CB initiative created a dangerous public hazard and cost millions in wasted time and money and energy.
    • The applicants for the 501c4 status were allowed by law to proceed doing business as if they had achieved their exempt status during the review process. Only one applicant was denied. No firm suffered damages, only few endured increased scrutiny.

    I guess I'd have to ask this question:
    If forced to chose which violation you'd want, do you want to have the government indiscriminately block your access to hospitals, bridges and commerce because you didn't vote for them or do you want more scrutiny on people who don't want to pay taxes?

    As a personal editorial, I would like greater scrutiny on tax exempt companies. The potential for abuse, especially with the 501c4 "donor undisclosed" feature, is the primary reason the IRS got in trouble in the first place. Congress has to fix the tax laws and also appoint somebody other than the IRS to make the determination as to who should or shouldn't be granted tax-exempt status.

    As a further note, my organization applied in August of 2012 for 501c3 Tax exempt status to conduct basic immune system research. We have yet to receive our assignment. We are not disadvantaged by this at all.
    permalink
    Posted 01-24-2014 at 03:18 PM by xan xan is offline
  3. Old Comment
    Utah_Saint's Avatar

    Sanity Zone 1- 24 - 2014 Just Plain Mean

    Do you feel this is a different kind of preferential politics than the IRS targeting of specific political groups?
    permalink
    Posted 01-24-2014 at 07:38 AM by Utah_Saint Utah_Saint is offline
  4. Old Comment
    Utah_Saint's Avatar

    NOW THAT IT'S OVER?

    No. I don't think the Saint's 11-5 season was worthy of much respect in the eyes of the media. There are too many negative things come to mind, the worst defense in the history of the NFL and a losing record was just last season, the losing record on the road this season and specifically losing to the Jets and the Rams. Even the great defense the Saints have had this year isn't as good as the Seahawks or the Niners.

    The 40whiners got credit for three reasons that I can think of. First, they beat the Seahawks the last time they played. Second they had just won two road playoff games and Third and most importantly in my opionion, this was their third NFC championship game in a row. The have established themselves as a powerhouse.

    New Orleans is a small market. The national media doesn't have to pander to the Saints the way ESPN does to the North Eastern teams or the big city markets. Credit, is earned. And the media likes things simple, they don't want to have to dig deep to find the reasons why the Saints struggled on the road or why the defense was so bad last year. If it's not obvious, then they won't write about it. It was too easy to run with "The Saints can't win on the road" or "Drew can't play in the cold" than actually figure out why.

    Just my opinion.
    permalink
    Posted 01-21-2014 at 05:24 PM by Utah_Saint Utah_Saint is offline
  5. Old Comment
    permalink
    Posted 01-11-2014 at 05:14 PM by CajunTiger28 CajunTiger28 is offline
  6. Old Comment
    Halo's Avatar

    What Are Your New Year's Resolutions for 2014

    Praying that my friends and loved ones stay alive. I'm already -1 in that category.
    permalink
    Posted 01-10-2014 at 05:17 PM by Halo Halo is offline
  7. Old Comment
    Halo's Avatar

    ARE WE PLAYING OR WHAT? ? ?

    I think saying "with the saints winning their first playoff win in franchise history" is disrespectful too. You must have made an error.
    permalink
    Posted 01-10-2014 at 05:15 PM by Halo Halo is offline
  8. Old Comment
    hagan714's Avatar

    ARE WE PLAYING OR WHAT? ? ?

    "disrespectful!" thats cool it keeps the team down to earth. love flying under the radar
    permalink
    Posted 01-10-2014 at 10:57 AM by hagan714 hagan714 is offline
  9. Old Comment
    TheOak's Avatar

    ARE WE PLAYING OR WHAT? ? ?

    First playoff win in franchise history? I couldn't make heads or tails of the rest of the blog..
    permalink
    Posted 01-09-2014 at 01:29 PM by TheOak TheOak is offline
  10. Old Comment

    What Are Your New Year's Resolutions for 2014

    Years ago I resolved to never make another new years resolution, the only one I ever kept.
    permalink
    Posted 01-06-2014 at 12:29 PM by halfmoon61 halfmoon61 is offline
  11. Old Comment
    Halo's Avatar

    ARE THE SAINTS A ONE AND DOME TEAM?

    Saints 26 Philly 24 @ Philly. Nuff said.
    permalink
    Posted 01-05-2014 at 03:49 PM by Halo Halo is offline
  12. Old Comment
    SloMotion's Avatar

    What Are Your New Year's Resolutions for 2014

    Fish more, internet less ... so far, so good,

    permalink
    Posted 01-03-2014 at 06:50 AM by SloMotion SloMotion is offline
  13. Old Comment

    ARE THE SAINTS A ONE AND DOME TEAM?

    What uniforms are the saints wearing?
    permalink
    Posted 01-02-2014 at 06:39 PM by gomaneasy gomaneasy is offline
  14. Old Comment

    What Are Your New Year's Resolutions for 2014

    I'm hoping to be able to pay for the medical insurance I was forced to buy.
    permalink
    Posted 01-02-2014 at 03:30 PM by fischware fischware is offline
  15. Old Comment

    Counter Measures

    Wow, I feel that way too. Then I wonder, am I jus concocting these scenarios in my own head. Remember, the Ram's for instance are in the same division as AZ, SF, and Seattle. Their division record is 1-5, which means they're a pretty good team.

    I used to bet dogs--occasionally they'd run Stake's Races, like tournaments where Kennels would enter their best, from all grades. They would run with the big dogs, and they'd eliminate all but the top few in each couple of races, then run the rest. Each round you could follow those who dropped out, and the longer they ran with the good dogs, the better they did when they got back to their grade.

    The Ram's have been running with some good dogs, and let's face it, the Jet's have a pretty awesome defense, AND the guy is Ryan's brother--that makes you think a bit.
    permalink
    Posted 01-01-2014 at 10:23 AM by mike27 mike27 is offline
  16. Old Comment
    permalink
    Posted 12-31-2013 at 02:35 PM by foreverfan foreverfan is offline
  17. Old Comment
    TheOak's Avatar

    Truth and History of How Our Country was Stolen.

    The Federal Reserve is not part of the Government but there are laws that require you to pay Federal taxes. Those laws are known as the Internal Revenue Code.

    The Federal Reserve has nothing to do with the Internal Revenue Service.

    Internal Revenue Code
    Internal Revenue Code of 1986 legal definition of Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.

    Federal tax law begins with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), enacted by Congress in Title 26 of the United States Code (26 U.S.C.).

    Tax Code, Regulations and Official Guidance
    26 USC Subtitle A - Income Taxes | Title 26 - Internal Revenue Code | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute
    permalink
    Posted 12-31-2013 at 12:55 PM by TheOak TheOak is offline
  18. Old Comment
    foreverfan's Avatar

    Truth and History of How Our Country was Stolen.

    There is NO LAW that requires you to pay the Federal Income Tax.

    Is the Federal Reserve a part of the United States Government, or is it a private bank owned and operated by multinational corporate interests?

    Do they have our nation's best interests at heart? Unless something changes, what does the future of the United States look like?


    permalink
    Posted 12-26-2013 at 11:31 AM by foreverfan foreverfan is offline
    Updated 12-26-2013 at 12:32 PM by foreverfan
  19. Old Comment
    permalink
    Posted 12-25-2013 at 07:43 AM by UK_WhoDat UK_WhoDat is offline
  20. Old Comment
    foreverfan's Avatar

    Truth and History of How Our Country was Stolen.

    "I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment." - U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

    Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a private bank. But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for generous campaign contributions. Wilson later regretted that decision.

    "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson 1919

    It was at this time that public schools in the United States shifted the history of the American Revolution away from the Currency act, lest some sharp student ask why the nation was now back under the exact same form of banking that revolution had been fought to free us from.

    As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.

    Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed form the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do. All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation's money supply. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

    Now we are once again hearing the politicians in Washington DC wail and moan about the need to raise the government's debt ceiling. The debate is framed by the servile corporate media as whether we should or should not, because the really important question Americans need to ask is why the government is in such debt to begin with. And the answer (which the federal Reserve hopes you never realize) is really quite simple. When you have a privately-owned central bank issuing the nation's currency as a loan at interest, by design the debt always exceeds the available money supply. There is no way to ever pay the debt off, which is why the whole system is a trap. The moment that first pretty printed piece of paper was loaned into circulation..

    ... more money is owed to that bank than is actually in existence. It doesn't matter how hard the people work, how much they pay in taxes, or how much they sacrifice, they can never get out of that debt ... as long as they play by the rules the private central banks created, like the money itself, out of thin air.

    So, as this debate about raising the debt ceiling starts up again, remember that the reason the corporate media is so focused on whether the debt ceiling should be raised or not, is because they don't want you thinking about why there is such a huge debt to begin with.

    The question both government and the corporate media will never ask, and hope you do not ask, is why, when the Constitution authorizes the US Government to create and issue debt-free money, has the United States Government borrowed instantly-created money at interest from a privately-owned central bank and cursed you and your descendants with the out of control interest?

    But that IS the question you need to ask yourself, your family and friends, indeed everyone you know.

    Why, when the Constitution authorizes the US Government to create and issue debt-free money, has the United States Government borrowed instantly-created money at interest from a privately-owned central bank and cursed you and your descendants with the out of control interest, for the last 100 years?
    permalink
    Posted 12-24-2013 at 03:30 PM by foreverfan foreverfan is offline

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com