Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints > NFL

NFL Precedent

this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; While we discuss the extent of the penalties imposed on the Saints so far by the NFL let's also look at NFL precedent for what the violations should be. But before I go into the details of previous incidents, I ...

Like Tree4Likes
  • 4 Post By Predator

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2012, 07:01 PM   #1
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Post NFL Precedent

While we discuss the extent of the penalties imposed on the Saints so far by the NFL let's also look at NFL precedent for what the violations should be.

But before I go into the details of previous incidents, I would like to first point out that I have not heard a single Saints fan say that New Orleans should not be punished at all. And for full disclosure, I am a lifetime Saints fan. We just think that the penalty does not match NFL precedent.

NFL Argument 1: Player safety is important to the NFL. I will not debate that fact as I do think the NFL is concerned about player safety when it fits their needs.

The players have long argued that an 18 game schedule will cause an increase in injuries yet the NFL is proceeding with their push for an 18 game schedule.

But putting aside those arguments we will look at the 2 game suspension received by Suh of the Detroit Lions. This two game suspension came after three other previous fines issued by the league. League precedent has clearly been established. Violations regarding player safety carry increasing fines and could in a two game suspension as in the case of Suh.

Based on that fact, it would be argued that the Aaron Rogers bounty and the Cam Newton bounty carry 2 - 2 game suspension for a total of four games. The others from previous seasons should carry no penalty as the NFL in those cases chose to issue a warning to the Saints instead. Their is also precedent for a team just receiving a warning initially as with the Green Bay Packers.

Report: Packers focus of bounty probe in 2007 | Sports - Home

But for argument sake, lets say Warner and Favre should count even though they were not handled by the NFL with anything more than a warning when they were discovered by the NFL. That means 4 -2 game suspensions maximum. Considering there were no initial fines handed down first, as is NFL precedent for violations regarding player safety, that would mean that should be the maximum.

So argument 1 says that they should have gotten between 4-8 games suspension as a maximum.

NFL Argument 2: They lied to the NFL.

We will refer back to first to Suh again. He told the NFL that he was not stomping on the arm. Roger Goodell did not believe him and later suspended him. No penalty for lying.

Next we will look at Spygate. The facts that people have forgotten is that in Spygate, the Patriots were warned in a previous season and were caught again later. The Patriots then began to lie and try to cover-up the violation. So now we have precedent for a head coach and team executive lying to the NFL and trying to cover up something that they were previously warned to stop. See the link below about the initial warning by the NFL and the Patriots not heeding that warning while trying to cover up their violations.

With Belichick, the cover-up is most revealing - The Boston Globe

Belichick's penalty for lying, covering up and refusing to obey previous warning from the NFL, $500,000 fine.

So now the Saints penalty should be 4-8 games max and $500,000 penalty.

Bill Belichick, Patriots Got Off Easy With Spygate Penalties in Comparison to Sean Payton, Saints - NFL - NESN.com

When you really start looking at NFL precedent, you will see that according to the NFL's own rulings, their penalty to the Saints is way out of line.

Next we will look at the other fact. It has been reported in numerous places that this also took place in Washington, Tennessee, Buffalo, New Orleans, Baltimore, Green Bay, New York Giants. But so far none of these teams have gotten the same penalties. In fact none of the other teams have gotten any penalties.

Below are the articles that establish where each of these teams had a bounty.

Ravens - NFL eyes Suggs' 'bounty' comments about Steelers - NFL - ESPN Quote directly from the player.
Giants - Kyle Williams: Dirty Giants Focused on 49ers Returner's Concussion History | Bleacher Report. Quote directly from the player.
Green Bay - NFL investigated Green Bay Packers for 'bounty rule' violations in 2007 - New Orleans Saints Football NFL News - NOLA.com
Buffalo - Bills bounty system under Williams alleged - Bills & NFL - The Buffalo News
Tennessee and Washington - Tony Dungy Claims Tennessee Titans Had a Bounty on Peyton Manning | Bleacher Report

If nobody else gets the same suspension as the Saints when we have acknowledgement from players themselves on other teams, then it becomes clear that the penalty then has no basis in established NFL precedent.

Again, neither myself nor any other Saints fan thinks that the bounty is ok and should go unpunished. We just think the punishment should be inline with punishments of similar nature. We also think that since we are punishing teams that have a bounty system and other teams have been found to also have bounty systems as well that we should not share the punishment alone.

If the NFL is serious about this and wants to be considered a just Judge, then other teams and players will join us and the penalties will be brought back to reality of established NFL precedent.
Predator is offline  
Latest Blogs
Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


What i tell you ! !! ! Last Blog: 11-02-2014 By: SAINTstunna


MID TERM ELECTION Last Blog: 10-29-2014 By: teddybarexxx


Old 03-24-2012, 07:07 PM   #2
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 7,993
nice read...
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 07:31 PM   #3
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,864
Thanks Predator.
You are being rational, logical. You should take your post to some other fans sites, nonSaints 'ones, and ESPN, and NFL Network.

Repost this under Saints'forum, thread started by Velvet Llama,
OldMaid is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 10:01 PM   #4
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 11,237
Blog Entries: 5
Very nice indeed. Again, the punishment ins't for the crime or the cover up. It's posturing for a legal defense...
saintfan is offline  
Old 03-25-2012, 02:15 PM   #5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 16
Yep agree with all thats said we were in the wrong but this is much much too harsh!
saintsflow is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/nfl/42603-nfl-precedent.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
NFL Precedent This thread Refback 03-24-2012 07:26 PM 9


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts