Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints > NFL

Shockey going after Sapp

this is a discussion within the NFL Community Forum; On Friday, former Saints tight end Jeremy Shockey failed to show for an interview on The Dan Patrick Show because Shockey was in a meeting. It later was disclosed that he was meeting with a lawyer. A league source tells ...

Like Tree3Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2012, 08:02 PM   #1
SaintsWillWin
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 10,455
Exclamation Shockey going after Sapp

On Friday, former Saints tight end Jeremy Shockey failed to show for an interview on The Dan Patrick Show because Shockey was in a meeting. It later was disclosed that he was meeting with a lawyer.

A league source tells PFT that Shockey has indeed been meeting with multiple lawyers, in order to devise a strategy for dealing with recent comments from NFL Network analyst Warren Sapp accusing Shockey of being the “snitch” who exposed the Saints’ three-year bounty system.

“He’s hell bent on doing something,” the source said of Shockey’s intentions.

That “something” could be the filing of a lawsuit. But that could make Shockey even less attractive to teams that currently are on the fence, at best, about the prospect of signing him.

Before Sapp’s comments, some teams were, we’re told, “mildly interested” in adding Shockey to the team. If stronger interest isn’t shown soon, Shockey could indeed resort to legal action.

It would be hard to blame him. If Shockey was indeed the whistleblower (and we’re told he wasn’t), he has federal rights against retaliation of any kind. If Shockey wasn’t the whistleblower, his rights would arise from notions of defamation.

A lawyer also could argue that, while Shockey isn’t the whistleblower, he’s being regarded as the whistleblower, and he’s suffering retaliation for something he didn’t do.

Regardless of any legal rights or remedies, the NFL never should have allowed any speculation or discussion or debate regarding the situation on its air. The far bigger concern is, in our view, individual safety, and if Shockey is perceived to be the “snitch” who helped tarnish a Super Bowl trophy and derail the quest for another one, a zealous and crazy Saints fan could decide to do something about it.

The league also should be concerned about the impact of this controversy on future investigations. Any player or coach who is thinking about blowing the whistle on wrongful activities may think twice about getting involved, given that the league-owned network showed zero appreciation of the importance of protecting those who cooperate with sensitive investigations regarding inflammatory circumstances.


Source: Shockey is

"A Veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."
WhoDat!656 is offline  
Latest Blogs
REFUND Last Blog: 12-07-2014 By: xan




Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


Old 03-24-2012, 09:57 PM   #2
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 11,263
Blog Entries: 5
I don't mind Sapp, but if I'm Shockey I'd sue him a new ass. Enough with this 'my sources say...' BS. If you're going to call somebody out have a pair big enough to put your name behind the accusation or STFU.

That's my .02
SmashMouth and Beastmode like this.
saintfan is offline  
Old 03-24-2012, 11:17 PM   #3
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 16
agree wholeheartedly with that above^^^
saintsflow is offline  
Old 03-27-2012, 02:58 PM   #4
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 3,790
Shockey and innocent in the same sentence....hard to type. But if he is not the whistle blower, he should go after Sapp full speed.
Mardigras9 is offline  
Old 03-27-2012, 03:23 PM   #5
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 3,792
its not going to end with shockey and sapp. the worms will be all over the place when the lid comes completley off. and the can opener goodell from hell will be running like a mortal in a zombie movie/
st thomas is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 11:15 PM   #6
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,588
Screw them both University of Miami after products. I didn't have any thing better to say so they get that.
Ashley is offline  
Old 04-05-2012, 12:14 AM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 18,918
put them in the RING and let them go at for five rounds.
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 04-05-2012, 02:16 AM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 1,370
Originally Posted by Ashley View Post
Screw them both University of Miami after products. I didn't have any thing better to say so they get that.
Uh GO CANES....
subguy is offline  
Old 04-05-2012, 06:45 AM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wherever I lay my hat
Posts: 3,153
Originally Posted by QBREES9 View Post
put them in the RING and let them go at for five rounds.
Uh oh!

I hope you are not implying anything too unsafe. You meant a ball play pit right?

UK_WhoDat is offline  
Old 04-05-2012, 10:55 AM   #10
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 16,193
What is Shockey going to sue for? Hard to find a precedent that hasn't already been covered by every major news agency that has run smear campaigns on politicians with miss-truths, or the national Enquirer type publications..

Sapps statements have not cost Shockey a dime or ruined his career.

Proving that Shockey can actually possibly suffer mental anguish will be a daunting tack.
jokeray likes this.
TheOak is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/nfl/42606-shockey-going-after-sapp.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Shockey going after Sapp This thread Refback 03-24-2012 08:21 PM 17


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts