|
|||||||
this is a discussion within the Poli-Sci Community Forum; Originally Posted by ScottF When it comes to your habit of name calling instead of responding to the substance of the post, there's a much more applicable Dostoyevsky novel. Look it up. Man are you drunk?...
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Site Donor
|
Re: CFA new gay stance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
40 year fan
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,341
|
Re: CFA new gay stance
My apologies, I assumed when you referenced Dostoyevsky that you knew something of the subject area.
I guess I was DISTRACTED by your fancy graphic, causing me to completely miss your response to my post about why you keep arguing about things in posts that aren't there. The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoyevsky - Reviews, Discussion, Bookclubs, Lists . |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Site Donor
|
Re: CFA new gay stance
Originally Posted by ScottF
You really are drunk aren't you?
Rest assured you won't educate me relative to my posts. I'm a fairly well-red bloke. I don't wander around pissing without proper aim. Do you feel smarter now? Good. Now, do you feel less distracted? Has the point hit home or did pass you by? It's okay bro. It takes all kinds to make a world you know? As we say in Radio, don't TOUCH anything. Just sit back and watch the blinking lights. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
40 year fan
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,341
|
Re: CFA new gay stance
Originally Posted by saintfan
There you go.
Keep firing shots and evading the question. Are you prepping for the big debate on the 3rd or just practicing that art of deflection you find so loathsome in others? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Site Donor
|
Re: CFA new gay stance
I have reviewed your posts in this thread. Forgive me. If you asked me a question I was unable to locate it. You may still be drunk?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|