How many times before Carney goes?

saintswhodi · 10-03-2005, 11:26 AM

Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.

WhoDat · 10-03-2005, 11:29 AM

am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.

Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me.

I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear?

TheGambler · 10-03-2005, 11:33 AM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.

Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out:

Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over..

Thanks pal.

WhoDat · 10-03-2005, 11:35 AM

Someone gets it.

saintswhodi · 10-03-2005, 11:36 AM

Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me.

I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear?

Does that go the same for the Brooks walks on water theme?

I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board

Not even remotely true. Like I said, be honest and it really wouldn't be a problem with me. That seems to get harder as these accusations go on.

saintswhodi · 10-03-2005, 11:37 AM

Originally Posted by TheGambler

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.

Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out:

Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over..

Thanks pal.

And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.

BlackandBlue · 10-03-2005, 11:43 AM

am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.

What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads.

TheGambler · 10-03-2005, 11:45 AM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.

If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks.

Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours.

saintswhodi · 10-03-2005, 11:51 AM

Originally Posted by BlackandBlue

am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously.

What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads.

You're about the most consistent guy I know on this board BandB. Even in the face of using your avatar to "come out" to everyone.

saintswhodi · 10-03-2005, 11:52 AM

Originally Posted by TheGambler

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.

If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks.

Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours.

Then you must miss the guy who makes threads in an attempt to deflect blame from Brooks at every shot. I call BS on you not seeing this. With a little less respect though.

10-03-2005, 11:29 AM	#22
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously. Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me. I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear?
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

10-03-2005, 11:33 AM	#23
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be. Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out: Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over.. Thanks pal.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-03-2005, 11:35 AM	#24
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Someone gets it.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

10-03-2005, 11:36 AM	#25
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Let's put it like this, shall we? I am still a moderator of this board. I don't give a sh!t what you think of me personally or the way in which I administer the rules of this board. Your participation here is a privelege for you and it can easily be withdrawn at any time. Go ahead and test me Whodi. You don't have to like me but you will respect me. I am in no way trying to say that any thread of this board has to address one topic and one topic only. I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board. Are we clear? Does that go the same for the Brooks walks on water theme? I am saying that the Brooks sucks theme will not continue to permiate every single thread on the board Not even remotely true. Like I said, be honest and it really wouldn't be a problem with me. That seems to get harder as these accusations go on.

10-03-2005, 11:37 AM	#26
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by TheGambler Originally Posted by saintswhodi Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be. Ok since you seem to be hung up on absolute specifics, I'll see if I can help out: Since you make at least 1 derrogatory comment re: Aaron Brooks in at least 91.435% of the threads you post in............would it be ok if you reduced that percentage to at least 67.932%, given that normally it's the same exact insults we see over, and over, and over, and over.. Thanks pal. And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha.

10-03-2005, 11:26 AM	#21
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Then go check the Stallworth thread and see if I ever mentioned AB's name. I didn't. If you guys are gonna have criteria, at least make it honest, as hard as that may be.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-03-2005, 11:43 AM	#27
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously. What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads.

10-03-2005, 11:45 AM	#28
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha. If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks. Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-03-2005, 11:51 AM	#29
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by BlackandBlue am sorry, but when WhoDat gains more consistency in when he chooses to address such issues, I will take it seriously. What about me? I've been pretty consistent with my hatred of the "AB sux" threads. You're about the most consistent guy I know on this board BandB. Even in the face of using your avatar to "come out" to everyone.

10-03-2005, 11:52 AM	#30
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by TheGambler Originally Posted by saintswhodi And since individuals make the same amount kissing his ass, do you have a problem with that? If not, that's a bit hypocritical isn't it? You will gladly not comment on someone posting what you wanna see over and over, but if it's not what you wanna see, it's a problem. Gotcha. If there's one thing I can safely say..........it's that I haven't seen any overabundance of Brooks praise on this forum in quite some time..particularly in the last 2 weeks. Therefore, I respectfully call "B.S." on your theory that pro-brooks threads are equal in percentage to yours. Then you must miss the guy who makes threads in an attempt to deflect blame from Brooks at every shot. I call BS on you not seeing this. With a little less respect though.