LAVAR ARRINGTON

RailBoss · 10-15-2005, 01:05 PM

LAVAR ARRINGTON IS SITTING ON THE REDSKINS BENCH COLLECTING SPLINTERS. HE DOESN'T FIT IN WITH THE GREGG WILLIAMS DEFENSE (SO THEY SAY). LOVE TO SEE HIM IN BLACK AND GOLD!!!!!!

Tobias-Reiper · 10-15-2005, 02:29 PM

..if you want an athletic LB who freelances a lot and runs himself out of plays - therefore putting more pressure on the other 2 LB's to make a play - while once in a while wooing you with a feat of incredible athletic ability, LaVar is your guy.

..don't get me wrong, I like LaVar, but he's better off sitting on a bench in Landover than with the Saints. LaVar is like a mean pitbull who's trainer releases the leash and says "sic boy!"... the Saints don't have a trainer...

lumm0x · 10-15-2005, 06:26 PM

I agree. We have cheaper players now than him who are already adept at getting themself out of position and failing to maintain the scheme integrity.

xan · 10-16-2005, 12:47 AM

lumm0x:

I agree. We have cheaper players now than him who are already adept at getting themself out of position and failing to maintain the scheme integrity.

I disagree. We should pick this guy up. At least he might make 3 or 4 plays a game. That beats being out of position on EVERY play. We need some mean-as-hell, take no prisoner players on that D. We could probably get this guy cheap as well. Maybe a 4th rounder or for AB.

lumm0x · 10-16-2005, 10:00 AM

At this time in the season, not a chance. You gotta figure his cap alone would make it impossible. Now if he agreed to re-structure his contract in the offseason, which I can't see him being willing to do, it might make sense to give it a chance. Like Tobias said, we have no one that can keep this guy in control. The Skins are a good defense and they see him as a liability. Sure the guy might happen to make 3-4 big plays a game because of sheer athleticism, but 5-6 big plays will happen against us because he blows his assignment freelancing out there.

While I agree, we could suck no matter which way you see it. I personally hate the ego-maniacs and the selfish players. I view Arrington in that light.

10-15-2005, 01:05 PM	#1
RailBoss 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: South Of The Mason Dixon Line Posts: 7,113	LAVAR ARRINGTON LAVAR ARRINGTON IS SITTING ON THE REDSKINS BENCH COLLECTING SPLINTERS. HE DOESN'T FIT IN WITH THE GREGG WILLIAMS DEFENSE (SO THEY SAY). LOVE TO SEE HIM IN BLACK AND GOLD!!!!!!

10-16-2005, 12:47 AM	#4
xan Professor Crab and Site Donor 2014 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 3,355 Blog Entries: 34	lumm0x: I agree. We have cheaper players now than him who are already adept at getting themself out of position and failing to maintain the scheme integrity. I disagree. We should pick this guy up. At least he might make 3 or 4 plays a game. That beats being out of position on EVERY play. We need some mean-as-hell, take no prisoner players on that D. We could probably get this guy cheap as well. Maybe a 4th rounder or for AB.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-15-2005, 02:29 PM	#2
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	..if you want an athletic LB who freelances a lot and runs himself out of plays - therefore putting more pressure on the other 2 LB's to make a play - while once in a while wooing you with a feat of incredible athletic ability, LaVar is your guy. ..don't get me wrong, I like LaVar, but he's better off sitting on a bench in Landover than with the Saints. LaVar is like a mean pitbull who's trainer releases the leash and says "sic boy!"... the Saints don't have a trainer...

10-15-2005, 06:26 PM	#3
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	I agree. We have cheaper players now than him who are already adept at getting themself out of position and failing to maintain the scheme integrity.

10-16-2005, 10:00 AM	#5
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	At this time in the season, not a chance. You gotta figure his cap alone would make it impossible. Now if he agreed to re-structure his contract in the offseason, which I can't see him being willing to do, it might make sense to give it a chance. Like Tobias said, we have no one that can keep this guy in control. The Skins are a good defense and they see him as a liability. Sure the guy might happen to make 3-4 big plays a game because of sheer athleticism, but 5-6 big plays will happen against us because he blows his assignment freelancing out there. While I agree, we could suck no matter which way you see it. I personally hate the ego-maniacs and the selfish players. I view Arrington in that light.