New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com (http://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (http://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Take a Flyer on Carr (http://blackandgold.com/saints/10394-take-flyer-carr.html)

Tobias-Reiper 10-15-2005 06:51 PM

..but Carr is cuter.. I like white boys better...

jbutts 10-15-2005 06:57 PM

RE: Take a Flyer on Carr
 
It can be said that Carr is under pressure more than brooks is, seeing as he is sacked more times than any one in recent history, however, Carr has less interceptions. Carr also has a better completion percentage. Carr has less yds but more touchdowns.

now. all im saying is that if we contend that Carr and Brooks hold on to the ball too long and play behind below average lines why wouldnt we want the one who plays better despite being hit more often?
we all know that stats can be perceived differently. but one quaterback throws more td then ints and completes more passes. i dont think those can mean anything but that.

saintswhodi 10-15-2005 07:20 PM

jbutts that's logic. The threadstarter doesn't know what that is. Anyway, why couldn't this be in the thread that's already about David Carr?

Tobias-Reiper 10-15-2005 07:39 PM

... but Carr is cuter.... I like white boys better..

Tobias-Reiper 10-15-2005 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
usually when a team gives up on a QB that means he sucks 9 times out of 10.


..it also means that the coaching staff is not afraid to recognize a mistake after 3 years of seeing an athletic player not be effective playing QB, unlike certain coaching staff whose name shall remain unspoken...

..and it's clique, not click... click is what you do with the mouse button...

Whodi, dooode!!! U da man!!! The bossman, the leader of the pack, the big kahuna, the big cheese, numero uno, V.I.P...

...can I still call you Whodi?

lynwood 10-15-2005 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
Quote:

It can be said that Carr is under pressure more than brooks is, seeing as he is sacked more times than any one in recent history, however, Carr has less interceptions. Carr also has a better completion percentage. Carr has less yds but more touchdowns.

now. all im saying is that if we contend that Carr and Brooks hold on to the ball too long and play behind below average lines why wouldnt we want the one who plays better despite being hit more often?
we all know that stats can be perceived differently. but one quaterback throws more td then ints and completes more passes. i dont think those can mean anything but that.

Carr also has a better defense, where as he's not forced to win the games on his arm alone. Grnated AB makes tons of mistakes, but some of those mistakes are forced because you know you have no chance defensively to win a game. That's why stats are deceiving. there are unforced errors boneheaded plays, and the we don't have a chance defensively so sling it errors. Houston doesn't have this problem.

Click, you have been put in check.

There you go again. AB carries the team by getting us 3 points against green bay? I'd love to have carr over AB. At least he can hit his receivers in stride and complete a screen pass, and isn't afraid to us his legs. And who has the most interceptions and who has the most TD passes again? yeah i'll join the clique on this one. You can be the weird kid in the library handling the A/V equipment.

BoudinSandwich 10-15-2005 10:02 PM

Even the "weird" kids know that something is wrong with Aaron Brooks' play at quarterback. Frankly, I'm suprised that someone still tries to defend his horrible play. No one that I know in person defends Brooks. No one.

saintswhodi 10-15-2005 10:20 PM

Quote:

..and it's clique, not click... click is what you do with the mouse button...
Look who you are talking to TR.

Quote:

Whodi, dooode!!! U da man!!! The bossman, the leader of the pack, the big kahuna, the big cheese, numero uno, V.I.P...

...can I still call you Whodi?
Why sure Tr. Sure. I won't let it go to my head. I promise. :D

Tobias-Reiper 10-15-2005 11:52 PM

... I'll call you "Generalisimo" from now on...

SapperSaint 10-16-2005 08:06 AM

I will more than likley get a "why did you butt in response" but here I go anyway,

BoB, you always, always defend Brooks. At least that is the way the rest of "Us" interpret it. If that is not what you are doing you need to be a little more clear on what the heck the point you are tring to get across is. The Thread did start out as an AB defense.

Quote:

But our QB won't get that excuse from the click
You are darn right he won't, I have not made this opinion about AB just recently. I have HAD this opinion about him for five years now. As so has many other people here. This is not and will not be a "bandwagon BROOKS SUCKS" one week then "BROOKS IS THE SAVIOR OF THE SAINTS" next week. Face it dude, this guy is gone.

Just out of nosiness, who do you want as our QB, If we had a decent O-line?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com