Re: RE: Re: 5 questions
 

Stallworth may not be there yet, but I really think he'll get there more quickly playing and practicing the role rather than continuing to be #2.

Also, I'm sorry I'm so harsh, but the reality is that Joe isn't producing THIS YEAR equivalent to the money he is getting. The past years are gone. He got paid along the way. If he and other players have problems with the current pay structure, maybe they should suggest a 100% incentive based pay structure in which Joe could have been paid like a pro bowler when he was one. I don't think we should be paying him like a pro bowler this year when he clearly has not produced enough to be one.

That may be harsh, but it is the way I feel.

I was going to address this last night, but had a porno to make.

They were rolling coverage to Horn's side all night during the Vikings game. He dropped a few, he'll even admit that, but Sharper was practically shadowing him all night.
Stallworth and Horn are not the same type of receivers, the "great" offensive minds on this coaching staff aren't utilizing Stallworth's strengths anyway. There are alot of things that Horn can do, and Stallworth either can't, or hasn't shown that he can do.
If we're going to pay pro-bowl type money for every year he went to the pro-bowl, then the organization owes him another two years, because outside of 2002, he's never been paid anywhere close to that.
If we go down that road, we might as well have an accountant sitting on the sidelines with a checkbook, issuing checks for every good play that was made. That would be super- watching all the players running off the field, making a bee-line towards some little old man in a suit.