Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Sammy Knight

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't know, but I can tell you one thing. Sammy Knight was leagues above Jay Bellamy....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2006, 09:41 AM   #21
OldiesDJ
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scott, LA
Posts: 951
Blog Entries: 12
I don't know, but I can tell you one thing. Sammy Knight was leagues above Jay Bellamy.
BoudinSandwich is offline  
Latest Blogs
How to really handle Ray Rice and AP Last Blog: 09-17-2014 By: neugey


The Lost Art of the Trade Last Blog: 08-30-2014 By: jeanpierre


Childhood Trauma Prevention Last Blog: 08-29-2014 By: Barry from MS


Old 01-29-2006, 08:04 AM   #22
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Sammy Knight was traded because of Michael Vick's speed. They wanted someone who could catch him.
sac-a-lait is offline  
Old 01-29-2006, 12:05 PM   #23
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,417
I am extremely pro Sammy. The main problem with him is that he is slow; this reduces our number of coverage options. With McKenzie here that may not be as big a problem. However, once teams figured out they could go over Sammy's head, he became much less threatening to teams. I'd be happy to see him return as a "Oldham" style safety - vetran leadership and only a dime safety.

As for Bullocks, the kid wasn't projected to start this year. He came in, and while I agree he made some rookie mistakes, he looked pretty good to me. He gives us way more coverage options. In cover three, we could choose which guys to drop, rather than having it decided for us. Also, it allows the corners to gamble more in cover two, with a fast guy back there. Bullocks is the future of our SS position (though I suspect it will be a LS position instead).

"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks :cool:
JKool is offline  
Old 01-29-2006, 12:19 PM   #24
Retired
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,546
Holy shizzle... JKool...

Only problem with that is I'm pretty sure he feels as if he still has a lot of offer. I rather not mess with Bullocks development. And with Gleason, Mitchell, Bullocks, Smith, and Bellamy, we really don't have a need for another safety. I rather carry an extra corner for coverage purposes of course... rather than a run stopping type of safety.
papz is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 06:06 PM   #25
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,417
I'd swap Sammy for Bellamy no problem.

How you doin' Papz?
JKool is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 10:04 PM   #26
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (aka Southern Canada)
Posts: 1,689
Originally Posted by papz
Holy shizzle... JKool...
I concur.
ScottyRo is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 11:43 PM   #27
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 2,991
Blog Entries: 26
Kool, baby sweetheart. Good to see you chime.
xan is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts