Williams or Hawk?

zachsaints52 · 03-15-2006, 09:56 AM

BRICK!!! There is still good LB's in the second, but there is a bigger leap from Brick and Justic down to the others. I really like D'Qwell Jackson.

saintbuck · 03-15-2006, 09:59 AM

brick in the first and hodge in the second. i like that if we are taking brick first

Dhatboi · 03-15-2006, 10:05 AM

I think we should get some one on D with first one then second take a lineman..........
EIETHER WAY WE NEED TO TRADE DOWN AND GET ANOTHER 2ND AND MORE.....
But with our luck our clock would run out and we wouldnt get no one.......

dont we need another corner?
i would like to see woodson in a saints uni.......

You hear bout the vickings new uniss

leilung · 03-15-2006, 11:31 AM

Hawk for me.

Haven't had any respect on D since Mills left.

Saintuary · 03-15-2006, 11:41 AM

We must protect our investment. Talk about circle the wagons we circle the howiitzers. Can't touch Brees and holes for Duece. Brick

GoldRush26 · 03-15-2006, 12:07 PM

Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo

Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level.

Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl.

LKelley67 · 03-15-2006, 12:26 PM

at the #2 spot only Mario or Brick. I prefer the thought of brick bookending with jammal for a decade. Hawk is special but more likely #5 to #7. I would never be disappointed with him tho whether #2 or in a trade with the jets for #4.

BrooksMustGo · 03-15-2006, 03:25 PM

Originally Posted by GoldRush26

Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo

Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level.

Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl.

oops

LivnaLieTimay · 03-15-2006, 04:23 PM

Not a big fan of drafting Hawk, Brick, or Williams in the top 4. I don't like going OL this high in the draft, we're solid at DE, and Hawk was the 2nd best lb in his conference last year. Ideally I'd like to see Bush fall to #2. Otherwise, trade with Oakland and pick up Hawk if he's still there or Davis and give Brees a TE similar to what he had in SD.

GoldRush26 · 03-15-2006, 05:01 PM

Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo

Originally Posted by GoldRush26

Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo

Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level.

Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl.

oops

It's cool....we still shouldn't pick him, for the obvious reason. D'Brick or Hawk would make much more sense.

03-15-2006, 10:05 AM	#13
Dhatboi Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 74	I think we should get some one on D with first one then second take a lineman.......... EIETHER WAY WE NEED TO TRADE DOWN AND GET ANOTHER 2ND AND MORE..... But with our luck our clock would run out and we wouldnt get no one....... dont we need another corner? i would like to see woodson in a saints uni....... You hear bout the vickings new uniss
Dhatboi Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 74

03-15-2006, 12:07 PM	#16
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594	Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level. Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl.
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594

03-15-2006, 03:25 PM	#18
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	Originally Posted by GoldRush26 Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level. Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl. oops

03-15-2006, 05:01 PM	#20
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594	Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo Originally Posted by GoldRush26 Originally Posted by BrooksMustGo Brick, he owned Williams all through the senior bowl. If he's handling every pass rusher coming out of college this year, he's got to have a shallower learning curve on the next level. Dude that wasn't Mario Wiliams he did that to....I told u that in the other post. That was Mathias Kiwanuka....Mario Williams is an underclassman so he wasn't even AT the Senior Bowl. oops It's cool....we still shouldn't pick him, for the obvious reason. D'Brick or Hawk would make much more sense.
GoldRush26 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 594

03-15-2006, 09:56 AM	#11
zachsaints52 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Abingdon, Virginia Posts: 522	BRICK!!! There is still good LB's in the second, but there is a bigger leap from Brick and Justic down to the others. I really like D'Qwell Jackson.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-15-2006, 09:59 AM	#12
saintbuck 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Mamou, LA. Posts: 313	brick in the first and hodge in the second. i like that if we are taking brick first

03-15-2006, 11:31 AM	#14
leilung Booty Bandit Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: The Wastelands that are NJ Posts: 1,148	Hawk for me. Haven't had any respect on D since Mills left.

03-15-2006, 11:41 AM	#15
Saintuary 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Palm Bay, FL Posts: 198	We must protect our investment. Talk about circle the wagons we circle the howiitzers. Can't touch Brees and holes for Duece. Brick

03-15-2006, 12:26 PM	#17
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	at the #2 spot only Mario or Brick. I prefer the thought of brick bookending with jammal for a decade. Hawk is special but more likely #5 to #7. I would never be disappointed with him tho whether #2 or in a trade with the jets for #4.

03-15-2006, 04:23 PM	#19
LivnaLieTimay 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New York Posts: 1,494	Not a big fan of drafting Hawk, Brick, or Williams in the top 4. I don't like going OL this high in the draft, we're solid at DE, and Hawk was the 2nd best lb in his conference last year. Ideally I'd like to see Bush fall to #2. Otherwise, trade with Oakland and pick up Hawk if he's still there or Davis and give Brees a TE similar to what he had in SD.