|
|||||||
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Because you post rediculous numbers in half a season, does not make one an "impact", imo Who are you talking about?...
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,876
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,876
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
But why would we get a guy who isn't going to be playing the whole time when we can draft a guy at a position of need who WILL play the entire game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
500th Post
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 540
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
Deuce, I'm not arguing your point. I agree that it wouldn't be the best player for us by need, but if we've got him, it's an upgrade to the possition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,876
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
I guess it would be an upgrade, but I really think that the tandem of Grant and Will is one of the best in the NFL. I know he's a good player, but why use your best pick to upgrade a position that's already the best on your team when you have holes at OT, OC, LB, DT, and CB; none of which Williams will fill...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
grant is good, don't consider him to be "impact".
and again, i'm not advocating the pic. it is not what i would consider to be ideal. however, i would be happy with it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|