More on Brooks (No, NOT Leon)

LKelley67 · 04-10-2006, 09:33 AM

Ahmad Brooks. He would have been the first LB picked in the '05 draft if he would have entered early. If the FO thinks he is worth the risk he could be a real steal for a 3rd or 4th Rd supplemental pick. Remember Randy Moss woud have been a top five pick minmum but fell to 21 for character issues and baggage.

Somebody definitely to keep on the radar-

http://www.dailypress.com/sports/dp-...p-sports-local

pakowitz · 04-10-2006, 09:42 AM

hate to break it to you but we talked about this guy last week... but id have to say yea.. he is pretty good... i watched him play a few games and he can play with the best of him... injuries have slowed him down some this year but he is a good one...

zachsaints52 · 04-10-2006, 09:44 AM

For a third or 4th in the supplement? I would definatley do it. Than I wouldn't think we would need to get Hawk, because Brooks is up there too but injuries slowed him some. But if we could gaurentee him, get Brick for sure and Mangold with the second 1st we get from Jets and Wright with our 2nd.

LKelley67 · 04-10-2006, 09:50 AM

yup, I was in on that thread Pak. That is why I called it MORE on him. Good article.

TheDeuce · 04-10-2006, 10:09 AM

I've heard that Brooks was really good two years ago, but after some off the field problems he got lazy and EXTREMELY out of shape. He just wasn't the same.

Brooks, a senior, led Virginia in tackles as a freshman and sophomore but played in only six games during an injury-riddled 2005. As a sophomore, Brooks was All-ACC and a Butkus Award finalist. But he ballooned to 270 pounds as he struggled to recover from knee and ankle injuries last year.

An oft-injured, poor character LB? Haha no thanks.

04-10-2006, 09:33 AM	#1
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	More on Brooks (No, NOT Leon) Ahmad Brooks. He would have been the first LB picked in the '05 draft if he would have entered early. If the FO thinks he is worth the risk he could be a real steal for a 3rd or 4th Rd supplemental pick. Remember Randy Moss woud have been a top five pick minmum but fell to 21 for character issues and baggage. Somebody definitely to keep on the radar- http://www.dailypress.com/sports/dp-...p-sports-local

04-10-2006, 09:42 AM	#2
pakowitz The Dark Overlord Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,450	RE: More on Brooks (No, NOT Leon) hate to break it to you but we talked about this guy last week... but id have to say yea.. he is pretty good... i watched him play a few games and he can play with the best of him... injuries have slowed him down some this year but he is a good one...

04-10-2006, 09:44 AM	#3
zachsaints52 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Abingdon, Virginia Posts: 522	RE: More on Brooks (No, NOT Leon) For a third or 4th in the supplement? I would definatley do it. Than I wouldn't think we would need to get Hawk, because Brooks is up there too but injuries slowed him some. But if we could gaurentee him, get Brick for sure and Mangold with the second 1st we get from Jets and Wright with our 2nd.

04-10-2006, 10:09 AM	#5
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	I've heard that Brooks was really good two years ago, but after some off the field problems he got lazy and EXTREMELY out of shape. He just wasn't the same. Brooks, a senior, led Virginia in tackles as a freshman and sophomore but played in only six games during an injury-riddled 2005. As a sophomore, Brooks was All-ACC and a Butkus Award finalist. But he ballooned to 270 pounds as he struggled to recover from knee and ankle injuries last year. An oft-injured, poor character LB? Haha no thanks.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-10-2006, 09:50 AM	#4
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	yup, I was in on that thread Pak. That is why I called it MORE on him. Good article.