Giants ink Arrington

SuJaguar00 · 04-22-2006, 11:00 AM

ESPN's John Clayton is reporting that the Giants and LB Lavar Arrington have agreed in principle to a 7yr. $49 deal.

This signing will alter the Giants draft plan as most had the them drafting a LB with their first round selection.

papz · 04-22-2006, 11:20 AM

I want to see how much he got upfront.

JimBone · 04-22-2006, 11:39 AM

Most liely more than he deserved. THe guy has really fallen off.

gandhi1007 · 04-22-2006, 12:48 PM

Originally Posted by JimBone

Most liely more than he deserved. THe guy has really fallen off.

Huh???

That's like saying T.O. has fallen off because he didn't get along with his coaching staff & didn't play all of last season. Big mouth...yes, but talent wise, he brings it every Sunday. Same thing with Arrington.

Arrington's presence was felt in every game he ever played in.

wheelman · 04-22-2006, 12:51 PM

Well, he did play off the bench last season.

gandhi1007 · 04-22-2006, 12:57 PM

Originally Posted by wheelman

Well, he did play off the bench last season.

Like I said before...T.O. didn't start for the Eagles last season. Would you say that was because the Eagles had better receivers on the team? Hell no. LaVar was not on the bench because Washington's other LB's were better. Believe that! The guy bought out his own contract just to get off the team.

papz · 04-22-2006, 01:01 PM

He actually forced his way back into the starting lineup after starting it in Gibbs doghouse. People might not like his attitude, but he's still a very good linebacker.

whodatsaintsfan26 · 04-22-2006, 01:15 PM

2000 Washington Redskins 16 55 44.0 11 4 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2001 Washington Redskins 14 99 82.0 17 0.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 6
2002 Washington Redskins 16 92 67.0 25 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 8
2003 Washington Redskins 16 88 75.0 13 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 10
2004 Washington Redskins 4 15 11.0 4 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2005 Washington Redskins 13 47 39.0 8 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1
TOTAL 79 396 318.0 78 22.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 31

Personally I think it was too much to pay for a guy whos numbers have steadily decined over the past 3 seasons.

hagan714 · 04-22-2006, 01:19 PM

Washington is in for a nightmare twice a year. well at least he will show up for those games.

gandhi1007 · 04-22-2006, 01:51 PM

Originally Posted by whodatsaintsfan26

2000 Washington Redskins 16 55 44.0 11 4 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2001 Washington Redskins 14 99 82.0 17 0.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 6
2002 Washington Redskins 16 92 67.0 25 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 8
2003 Washington Redskins 16 88 75.0 13 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 10
2004 Washington Redskins 4 15 11.0 4 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2005 Washington Redskins 13 47 39.0 8 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1
TOTAL 79 396 318.0 78 22.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 31

Personally I think it was too much to pay for a guy whos numbers have steadily decined over the past 3 seasons.

Look beyond what you read in the stat columns on NFL.com. If you simply look at stats, Aaron Brooks was a great QB. I can show you statistical years where he is better than QB's such as Brett Favre, Troy Aikman, John Elway, & Steve Young, but we all know how good Brooks was now don't we. He couldn't hold any of the aforementioned QB's jock straps!

But, let's break down those "declining" last 3 seasons of Arrington's you spoke of:

2005- Arrington was kept out of the starting lineup because of personal differences w/ his coaches most of the season.

2004-Arrington was injured most of the season. How many full games did he play that year? 3 right? And then he got hurt in his 4th game?

2003-Didn't he start in the Pro Bowl that year?

Now saying that he's expensive is one thing, but demeaning the man's playing ability by saying he's on the decline is another.

04-22-2006, 11:00 AM	#1
SuJaguar00 Rookie Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25	Giants ink Arrington ESPN's John Clayton is reporting that the Giants and LB Lavar Arrington have agreed in principle to a 7yr. $49 deal. This signing will alter the Giants draft plan as most had the them drafting a LB with their first round selection.
SuJaguar00 Rookie Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25

04-22-2006, 11:20 AM	#2
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,681	RE: Giants ink Arrington I want to see how much he got upfront.

04-22-2006, 12:48 PM	#4
gandhi1007 Part Time Pimp Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,967	Originally Posted by JimBone Most liely more than he deserved. THe guy has really fallen off. Huh??? That's like saying T.O. has fallen off because he didn't get along with his coaching staff & didn't play all of last season. Big mouth...yes, but talent wise, he brings it every Sunday. Same thing with Arrington. Arrington's presence was felt in every game he ever played in.

04-22-2006, 12:51 PM	#5
wheelman Sammich Lover Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 682	Well, he did play off the bench last season.
wheelman Sammich Lover Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 682

04-22-2006, 12:57 PM	#6
gandhi1007 Part Time Pimp Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,967	Originally Posted by wheelman Well, he did play off the bench last season. Like I said before...T.O. didn't start for the Eagles last season. Would you say that was because the Eagles had better receivers on the team? Hell no. LaVar was not on the bench because Washington's other LB's were better. Believe that! The guy bought out his own contract just to get off the team.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-22-2006, 11:39 AM	#3
JimBone 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Thibodaux, La Posts: 614	Most liely more than he deserved. THe guy has really fallen off.

04-22-2006, 01:01 PM	#7
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,681	He actually forced his way back into the starting lineup after starting it in Gibbs doghouse. People might not like his attitude, but he's still a very good linebacker.

04-22-2006, 01:15 PM	#8
whodatsaintsfan26 500th Post Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Dallas Texas Posts: 577	2000 Washington Redskins 16 55 44.0 11 4 0 0 0.0 0 0 4 2001 Washington Redskins 14 99 82.0 17 0.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 6 2002 Washington Redskins 16 92 67.0 25 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 8 2003 Washington Redskins 16 88 75.0 13 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 10 2004 Washington Redskins 4 15 11.0 4 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 2 2005 Washington Redskins 13 47 39.0 8 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 TOTAL 79 396 318.0 78 22.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 31 Personally I think it was too much to pay for a guy whos numbers have steadily decined over the past 3 seasons.

04-22-2006, 01:19 PM	#9
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Washington is in for a nightmare twice a year. well at least he will show up for those games.

04-22-2006, 01:51 PM	#10
gandhi1007 Part Time Pimp Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,967	Originally Posted by whodatsaintsfan26 2000 Washington Redskins 16 55 44.0 11 4 0 0 0.0 0 0 4 2001 Washington Redskins 14 99 82.0 17 0.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 6 2002 Washington Redskins 16 92 67.0 25 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 8 2003 Washington Redskins 16 88 75.0 13 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 10 2004 Washington Redskins 4 15 11.0 4 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 2 2005 Washington Redskins 13 47 39.0 8 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 TOTAL 79 396 318.0 78 22.5 3 120 40.0 67 1 31 Personally I think it was too much to pay for a guy whos numbers have steadily decined over the past 3 seasons. Look beyond what you read in the stat columns on NFL.com. If you simply look at stats, Aaron Brooks was a great QB. I can show you statistical years where he is better than QB's such as Brett Favre, Troy Aikman, John Elway, & Steve Young, but we all know how good Brooks was now don't we. He couldn't hold any of the aforementioned QB's jock straps! But, let's break down those "declining" last 3 seasons of Arrington's you spoke of: 2005- Arrington was kept out of the starting lineup because of personal differences w/ his coaches most of the season. 2004-Arrington was injured most of the season. How many full games did he play that year? 3 right? And then he got hurt in his 4th game? 2003-Didn't he start in the Pro Bowl that year? Now saying that he's expensive is one thing, but demeaning the man's playing ability by saying he's on the decline is another.
	http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...gs/12-3006.jpg ______________________________ KNOWING IS HALF THE BATTLE! -G.I. Joe

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode