Never too early: Top players for 2007

LSUJeremy · 05-09-2006, 09:57 PM

Regardless of who is the starter this year and next, the fact that you can argue that one is better than the other when all three will end up in the NFL is a great problem to have. If you switch gears to the Saints situation at QB the last couple years...well, everyone knows that story.

Having that much talent at QB for a consistent top 10 team with a roster full of future NFL players, it doesn't matter who the starter is. LSU's gonna win a lot of games.

saintswhodi · 05-09-2006, 10:01 PM

First, I wanna say i'm with Jeremy in not hearing anything about them simplifying the O for Flynn. Not once did I hear that.

I agree with you on Perrilloux ghandi. I am all over that kids bandwagon. And look at you making AB lover type excuses for Jamarcus. lol I like that, but ain't buying it. I saw just about every LSU game last year, except the games against the scrub teams, and there were game when JaMarcus just looked awful, then he'd hit his stride. It wasn't all about drops and Addai. Now, I like Jamarcus, I have nothing against him, but Flynn gives us more options. And seriously, how many starts does Flynn have to be compared to Brooks or Bouman? That's pretty wrong to call a guy that after he sits for 3 and a half quarters and plays in mop up duty. In a FULL game in a BOWL game, he was awesome. I guess you could take snippets of anyone's career and make them look like Brooks-Bouman. Doesn't make it right.

LSUJeremy · 05-09-2006, 10:12 PM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

First, I wanna say i'm with Jeremy in not hearing anything about them simplifying the O for Flynn. Not once did I hear that.

I posted over on the Lair asking if anyone heard about or thought we had simplified the offense. I've started an argument over there.

People are pointing to the fact that we rushed for over 200yds and didn't have to do too much with the way the offense was working. Others are pointing that we used different packages because of Flynn's mobility vs Russells.

I know I saw some things in the game (Green at QB) that I'd never seen. I know we did some things differently with Flynn rolling out.

What I mainly know, is that we took the #1 rated defense in the country and beat them like they stole something from us. It was like televised jailhouse sex, and the "U" was LSU's bit*h.

I hate Miami. I'll stop now...

LSUJeremy · 05-09-2006, 10:17 PM

Pak was right. I forgot about this article. They simplified it to take the pressure off Flynn starting against such a good D.

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...80301/0/LIVING

saintswhodi · 05-09-2006, 10:24 PM

Originally Posted by LSUJeremy

Pak was right. I forgot about this article. They simplified it to take the pressure off Flynn starting against such a good D.

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...80301/0/LIVING

That article does 100% back up what Pak was saying, from Les Miles' mouth. Good memory. As far as the rest of that crap, start Perrilloux!!!! :P

gandhi1007 · 05-10-2006, 12:18 AM

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbc ... 1/0/LIVING

Now isn't that pretty much what I said when I wrote this?

LOL

Also, Jamarcus had to play with Joe Addai & key offensive linemen missing in his "bad" games this year. Not to mention, our receivers had an a**load of dropped balls that hit them square in the chest in those games. All were healthy & quite hyped after losing to Georgia & going into the Peach Bowl. And I'll also say our receivers didn't drop much in that game, either. Not to say Jamarcus is better. They both have their assets. Jamarcus has a better arm. Matt is more mobile. To be honest with you though, after watching all the practices & the "Purple & Gold" game last year, I think Perriloux will be better than both.

TallySaint · 05-10-2006, 08:30 AM

Clearly, though, we'll be trading up to draft Landry.

Clearly? Huh?

8)

zachsaints52 · 05-10-2006, 08:50 AM

I think whoever gets Bush from Lousiville is getting a deal. Watching him play is like watching a big body doing moves of smaller guys. I can't wait to watch Lousville play next year, because I think they are returning their QB back to, but I am not for sure.

saintswhodi · 05-10-2006, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by gandhi1007

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbc ... 1/0/LIVING

Now isn't that pretty much what I said when I wrote this? LOL

Also, Jamarcus had to play with Joe Addai & key offensive linemen missing in his "bad" games this year. Not to mention, our receivers had an a**load of dropped balls that hit them square in the chest in those games. All were healthy & quite hyped after losing to Georgia & going into the Peach Bowl. And I'll also say our receivers didn't drop much in that game, either. Not to say Jamarcus is better. They both have their assets. Jamarcus has a better arm. Matt is more mobile. To be honest with you though, after watching all the practices & the "Purple & Gold" game last year, I think Perriloux will be better than both.

I recall writers making these same excuses for Brooks too. Now that I read back, it seems this guy has a bias towards Russell, and played it up fully. So there. Start Perrilloux!!!!!!!!!

BrooksMustGo · 05-10-2006, 10:17 AM

Brady Quinn is an interesting prospect, but the best candidate for the next draft will have to come out early.

Adrian Peterson out of Oklahoma really is the second coming of Jim Brown. He's the most dominant player in the college game and really a once in a lifetime player.

05-09-2006, 09:57 PM	#31
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472	Regardless of who is the starter this year and next, the fact that you can argue that one is better than the other when all three will end up in the NFL is a great problem to have. If you switch gears to the Saints situation at QB the last couple years...well, everyone knows that story. Having that much talent at QB for a consistent top 10 team with a roster full of future NFL players, it doesn't matter who the starter is. LSU's gonna win a lot of games.
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472

05-09-2006, 10:12 PM	#33
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472	Originally Posted by saintswhodi First, I wanna say i'm with Jeremy in not hearing anything about them simplifying the O for Flynn. Not once did I hear that. I posted over on the Lair asking if anyone heard about or thought we had simplified the offense. I've started an argument over there. People are pointing to the fact that we rushed for over 200yds and didn't have to do too much with the way the offense was working. Others are pointing that we used different packages because of Flynn's mobility vs Russells. I know I saw some things in the game (Green at QB) that I'd never seen. I know we did some things differently with Flynn rolling out. What I mainly know, is that we took the #1 rated defense in the country and beat them like they stole something from us. It was like televised jailhouse sex, and the "U" was LSU's bit*h. I hate Miami. I'll stop now...
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472

05-09-2006, 10:17 PM	#34
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472	Pak was right. I forgot about this article. They simplified it to take the pressure off Flynn starting against such a good D. http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...80301/0/LIVING
LSUJeremy 100th Post Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 472

05-09-2006, 10:24 PM	#35
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by LSUJeremy Pak was right. I forgot about this article. They simplified it to take the pressure off Flynn starting against such a good D. http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...80301/0/LIVING That article does 100% back up what Pak was saying, from Les Miles' mouth. Good memory. As far as the rest of that crap, start Perrilloux!!!! :P

05-10-2006, 12:18 AM	#36
gandhi1007 Part Time Pimp Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,967	http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbc ... 1/0/LIVING Now isn't that pretty much what I said when I wrote this? LOL Also, Jamarcus had to play with Joe Addai & key offensive linemen missing in his "bad" games this year. Not to mention, our receivers had an a**load of dropped balls that hit them square in the chest in those games. All were healthy & quite hyped after losing to Georgia & going into the Peach Bowl. And I'll also say our receivers didn't drop much in that game, either. Not to say Jamarcus is better. They both have their assets. Jamarcus has a better arm. Matt is more mobile. To be honest with you though, after watching all the practices & the "Purple & Gold" game last year, I think Perriloux will be better than both.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

05-09-2006, 10:01 PM	#32
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	First, I wanna say i'm with Jeremy in not hearing anything about them simplifying the O for Flynn. Not once did I hear that. I agree with you on Perrilloux ghandi. I am all over that kids bandwagon. And look at you making AB lover type excuses for Jamarcus. lol I like that, but ain't buying it. I saw just about every LSU game last year, except the games against the scrub teams, and there were game when JaMarcus just looked awful, then he'd hit his stride. It wasn't all about drops and Addai. Now, I like Jamarcus, I have nothing against him, but Flynn gives us more options. And seriously, how many starts does Flynn have to be compared to Brooks or Bouman? That's pretty wrong to call a guy that after he sits for 3 and a half quarters and plays in mop up duty. In a FULL game in a BOWL game, he was awesome. I guess you could take snippets of anyone's career and make them look like Brooks-Bouman. Doesn't make it right.

05-10-2006, 08:30 AM	#37
TallySaint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Tallahassee Posts: 1,367	Clearly, though, we'll be trading up to draft Landry. Clearly? Huh? 8)

05-10-2006, 08:50 AM	#38
zachsaints52 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Abingdon, Virginia Posts: 522	I think whoever gets Bush from Lousiville is getting a deal. Watching him play is like watching a big body doing moves of smaller guys. I can't wait to watch Lousville play next year, because I think they are returning their QB back to, but I am not for sure.

05-10-2006, 09:03 AM	#39
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by gandhi1007 http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbc ... 1/0/LIVING Now isn't that pretty much what I said when I wrote this? LOL Also, Jamarcus had to play with Joe Addai & key offensive linemen missing in his "bad" games this year. Not to mention, our receivers had an a**load of dropped balls that hit them square in the chest in those games. All were healthy & quite hyped after losing to Georgia & going into the Peach Bowl. And I'll also say our receivers didn't drop much in that game, either. Not to say Jamarcus is better. They both have their assets. Jamarcus has a better arm. Matt is more mobile. To be honest with you though, after watching all the practices & the "Purple & Gold" game last year, I think Perriloux will be better than both. I recall writers making these same excuses for Brooks too. Now that I read back, it seems this guy has a bias towards Russell, and played it up fully. So there. Start Perrilloux!!!!!!!!!

05-10-2006, 10:17 AM	#40
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	Brady Quinn is an interesting prospect, but the best candidate for the next draft will have to come out early. Adrian Peterson out of Oklahoma really is the second coming of Jim Brown. He's the most dominant player in the college game and really a once in a lifetime player.