Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

memory lane, the year 2001, just eliminated from playoffs.........

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; pay note to our offensive line, our defensive line and answer the question, did haslett not have what it took? ahhh, it's good to be back............. http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/8772/...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2007, 01:07 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,879
memory lane, the year 2001, just eliminated from playoffs.........

pay note to our offensive line, our defensive line and answer the question, did haslett not have what it took? ahhh, it's good to be back.............

http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/8772/
ssmitty is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 01:29 PM   #2
Pink Nightmare
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,028
Blog Entries: 7
"At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had"

I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years.
SapperSaint is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:06 PM   #3
The NY Geaux Getter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
Originally Posted by SapperSaint View Post
"At quarterback, the only question is whether Blake or Brooks will win the battle to start. The two of them comprise the best quarterback tandem the Saints have ever had"

I wonder how different it would have been if Blake had been our number one during the AB years.
After all the trouble the team had went through to get Blake, one would think he could have been given a better chance to redeem his composure after his injury.
Fleured is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:47 PM   #4
500th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 657
Brooks won the first playoff game the Saints ever won, and I liked him as the Saints QB. I just wish he had a better offensive line, the last couple of years. It was not Brooks' fault that Blake got hurt.
saintsrule is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:43 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,403
Some say that "you can't lose you're job due to an injury"

I never believed that saying, IMO Blake was the better QB of the two, I wish he would have been given another chance when he healed from his injuries to see how well he could have been in N.O
What ever happened to Blake anyway?
LongTimeFan is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 10:54 PM   #6
DARE TO ENTER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Home Sweet Home, NEW ORLEANS, La.
Posts: 1,154
IMO, Blake should have never been cut, who ever made that call really F-UP! Maybe Brooks would have been a better QB had he sat behind Blake for a couple of years.
blacksaint is offline  
Old 05-10-2007, 05:42 AM   #7
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
I do not care which QB played during the Haz years, they were going to loss. Haz and the Org. tore the club apart piece by piece. Look at the rosters thru Hazs years and you will see the drop off in wins as the players were lost. No body on the team stood a chance of winning.

Turley was right when he said his anger was over all the good players the team was letting get away and he did not want to be part off an Org. that is not committed to winning.

Last edited by hagan714; 05-10-2007 at 05:45 AM..
hagan714 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts