Devery Henderson for a second
 

and a bag of potato chips. We need to get something for this guy now before it's too late. He is no better than what Stallpepper! What do you guys think :P

Devery is perfect for what we need him for. We need a jet to get down the field. We don't need him to catch the short possesion passes thats for other players.

This is why our offense was so successful. When you have many deminsions no Defense will be able to match up to every deminsion.

must be related to nemesis for this idea.

There are star studded receivers that have been had for less. Getting a second for Devery would be a miracle. Therefore, he needs to stay... at least until we see what Meachem is all about. I wouldn't think Devery would have much value right now on the trade market... he's more helpful to us catching passes.

What are you talking about, bobcat? If you took exception to some comment of mine, then presenting your counterpoint probably would've been respected and responded to. I don't roll like this.

There's no way anyone would give up a 2nd for Devery, we'd be lucky to get a 2nd for a player of Deuce's caliber.....and Devery isn't even close to that.

DH has shown flashes of settling into his role as a deep threat speed merchant. Those guys are often squirrely. The staff is taking exra time to develop him into a more consistent player this year. His contract season may offer more incentive to step up. I'd hold on to him, and try to re-sign him while his value isn't too high. I think he could be a marquee player, if he only decides he wants to become one. He has all the physical tools.

Good point, Nem.....

Guys, don't forget the chemistry that DH has developed with Drew. Our offense needs a guy to stretch the field for the dinks and flats passes. (remember the Dallas game last year??):handguns:

???
 

I like DH! A nice lil field stretcher. by all means...keep him.

I am pulling for Devery. He needs to just take that talent he has and get a confidence boost I think. He needs to come to TC with the attitude that he can be great and go out and do it. We need him to do this - not start over with another guy at this point.

He's not going anywhere, if he were, it would have happen before or during the draft. Besides, he didn't drop as many crucial passes as T. (DRAMA QUEEN)O. and the defense still has to honor his speed and field stretching ability. I thought he made some really nice plays last year, it just takes some receivers a little longer than others to adjust to life in the NFL, he's going to be a difference maker this season, trust me.

DH has not shown great hands inside the 10 to 15 yard range I give you that. But deep he is much better. Must take a few yards for the hands and eyes to get into sync I guess.
Right now you might get a Stallworth type of deal for him. I say keep and see what happens now that Drew and the coaches have taken him under their wing. So we loose him to FA next year. What difference does it make. We got depth at WR right. if he really developes we could always franchise him. :rolleyes:
At the least we could get the supplement pick in 2009 for him. Those are always good. They always over value players.

i agree, no way we could get a second for him. Plus I would get rid of him anway ,DH will have a good year. Geaux Saints

sorry nemesis,because of the timing,i mis-read your opinion.actually mine is similiar to your opinion when i read your full opinion later

Hey is that a double sized bag of chips?

I really don't see what bad thing Devery did that was soooo bad for anyone to talk about trading him. Devery is where, and in a role he needs to be.

I think Devery is improving. He has blazing speed, and forces secondaries to respect it. If he had been a 4th rounder we'd all be on his bandwagon. He probably opens things up underneath as well, so he does have an effect even when he doesn't touch the ball. And we've all seen what happens when secondaries don't respect his deep speed.

I think this is the year he either puts out or gets out.

No prob, man. I'm always up for a friendly debate.

No, it's snack size