Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Question (regarding Bush)

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't think so, and truthfully there was a game recently where neither Bell or PT were rolling, and Bush came in and had I think 75 yards on 5 or 6 carries. He had his problems earlier this year, ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2009, 05:01 PM   #11
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 9,079
Re: Better without Bush???

I don't think so, and truthfully there was a game recently where neither Bell or PT were rolling, and Bush came in and had I think 75 yards on 5 or 6 carries. He had his problems earlier this year, but I think he was beginning to run better the two games before the injury
spkb25 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:05 PM   #12
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,680
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Better without Bush???

just like the giants were better without shockey

we were 9-0 this year with reggie......we are 2-0 without him

that doesnt mean we are better without him

we are 11-0 without lance moore and jammal brown too

does that mean we are better without them?

no.....it means we played lights out and dominated a team that deserves almost all the credit it ever gets

reggie would've scored against the pats and we would've had another passing TD to add to brees' total
CantonLegend is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:13 PM   #13
Im BACK!!!!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 5,484
Re: Better without Bush???

Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
just like the giants were better without shockey

we were 9-0 this year with reggie......we are 2-0 without him

that doesnt mean we are better without him

we are 11-0 without lance moore and jammal brown too

does that mean we are better without them?

no.....it means we played lights out and dominated a team that deserves almost all the credit it ever gets

reggie would've scored against the pats and we would've had another passing TD to add to brees' total
I think that's a good answer.

PAUL, I just got the "like other facets in life" joke--lol.... I dont know, man, I'm from the 80s, so this totally barren look is weird to me--- I need just a little at least-- so I feel at home.
skymike is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:15 PM   #14
Senior Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 3,180
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Better without Bush???

I just want to say, that I'm NOT trying to start anything with this question, it's just a question. Maybe, just maybe, the Pats spent all week preparing for Bush in the game, only to find out he wasn't going to play, which could have gotten in their heads a little bit. Maybe...
SaintPauly is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:23 PM   #15
Cake or Death?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,605
Re: Better without Bush???

The Saints are even better with Bush is the correct answer. And that should scare the Redskins.
exile is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:25 PM   #16
Senior Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 3,180
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Better without Bush???

Originally Posted by skymike View Post
I think that's a good answer.

PAUL, I just got the "like other facets in life" joke--lol.... I dont know, man, I'm from the 80s, so this totally barren look is weird to me--- I need just a little at least-- so I feel at home.
What can I say? I'm a firm believer that "bald is beautiful".
SaintPauly is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:29 PM   #17
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,680
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Better without Bush???

Originally Posted by saintpaul25 View Post
What can I say? I'm a firm believer that "bald is beautiful".
***COUGH****

wow it took me awhile but not everyone can be as bright as skymike

now i get the original joke too lol
CantonLegend is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:04 PM   #18
Im BACK!!!!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 5,484
Re: Better without Bush???

Originally Posted by saintpaul25 View Post
What can I say? I'm a firm believer that "bald is beautiful".
uh uh... just too weird. bear in mind, the first "educational film" I ever saw was made in the early 70s, if that tells you anything.

You know, in a few more years, this joke wont even make sense, as no one will call it that anymore. It's like "rolling up" your window, "dialing" your phone, or "cranking" something up.

BOOGER ON REVENGE OF THE NERDS: "We have Bush."
PERSON IN THE YEAR 2012: "What do plants have to do with a party?"
skymike is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:20 PM   #19
Hou Saints Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 4,725
Re: Question (regarding Bush)

Well when Reggie isn't in the game, Sean doesn't try to force Reggie as the main guy on offense but at the same time when Reggie is in the game, defenses key on him and it helps open up the field. I think this production with out Reggie is just a product of this elite team and would be even greater with him in the line up
RaginCajun83 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 07:43 PM   #20
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 14,355
Re: Question (regarding Bush)

Reggie is still incredibly useful to Sean Payton. He will most likely reduce his contract because he knows he is used correctly here and that this team is a winner. I don't think he will want to go anywhere else, he's got a good thing going in New Orleans and he knows it.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts