First Take....

SaintPauly · 12-01-2009, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

I don't see why you take what they have to say so personal. It doesn't matter... all that matters is we keep winning and get that win that game they call the Super Bowl. Doesn't matter what anyone has to say right now. Leave it on the field and the rest will take care of itself.

Depth is over-rated also. Its all realitve, who ever is in the game has to make plays period. Brees gets hurt we'll see how is talking depth then.

Euph... Why is it when I bring up a valid argument, on a issue that I feel is important, you say I'm taking it personally? There are many posts on here, regarding the Saints, that can be regarded as "personal" statements. Thus the whole idea behind a "saints forum". A place to discuss, share, and even vent sometimes. That's what this board has been since I joined it, when did that change?

How boring would this place be, if all we do is come in and talk stats all the time? And depth over rated? Are you serious? COME ON MAN!

CantonLegend · 12-01-2009, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

And you are basing these observations on... ?

i just wanted you to reply so badly and try to prove me wrong with stats or something else ridiculous you think you could come up with to convince me that i am wrong and have always been that way

or maybe it was from watching the games goof

jared allen>will smith
jared allen>charles grant

pat williams>sed
Pat williams>remi
pat williams>pressley

kevin williams>sed
kevin williams>remi
kevin williams>pressley

AP>PT
AP>bell
AP>bush
AP>hamilton

saints>vikings

SaintPauly · 12-01-2009, 08:37 PM

ok, i have some stats myself. The Saints have 1489 rush yards, split between Bell, Thomas, and Bush. The Vikes have 1329, between Peterson, and their back up, with Peterson having 1084 by himself. That means the back up, has only 208 yards on his own. Now, if we are going to say, that if Brees goes down, we would be hurting, you will also have to say the same about Peterson. Either way, we still have more rushing yards, total, and our backs stay fresher longer, because it's not all on one guy to make it happen.

The only edge, that Minnesota has on us, is their D-line, I will give them that, but that's it. Would it be a good game, yes, but over all better than us, is ridiculous.

mighty12 · 12-01-2009, 08:46 PM

So I never do this type of thing but I just had to send an email to that TOOL, and since they wouldn't post it on the show I will post it here for your viewing pleasure.

"So all last week Who Dat nation had to listen to some of your joke NFL
'analysts' talk about how the Saints defense would be no match for New
England, especially the secondary, and then what happened? They Saints
dominated the passing game of Tom Brady and destroyed the Pats. Now,
instead of giving the Saints props we have to deal with talk about the
Vikings being more complete? You are a joke!"

SaintPauly · 12-01-2009, 08:51 PM

Excellent mail bro. Doubtful they will even care. ESPN is the VH1 of sports reporting. They are more worried about creating drama, out of situations, instead of just reporting the facts. Like yesterday, reporting something about Tiger Woods, that they read off the TMZ website. What's that all about? What's next, reports from myspace?

Tobias-Reiper · 12-01-2009, 10:06 PM

Originally Posted by CantonLegend

i just wanted you to reply so badly and try to prove me wrong with stats or something else ridiculous you think you could come up with to convince me that i am wrong and have always been that way

or maybe it was from watching the games goof

jared allen>will smith
jared allen>charles grant

pat williams>sed
Pat williams>remi
pat williams>pressley

kevin williams>sed
kevin williams>remi
kevin williams>pressley

AP>PT
AP>bell
AP>bush
AP>hamilton

saints>vikings

Geez, dude. Don't get so touchy just because I schooled you with the PT-Forte thing

I just asked you a question: what are you basing your statements on? That's all. Are you basing them on greater-than signs?

CantonLegend · 12-01-2009, 10:35 PM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

Geez, dude. Don't get so touchy just because I schooled you with the PT-Forte thing
I just asked you a question: what are you basing your statements on? That's all. Are you basing them on greater-than signs?

lmao you sure showed me......

you know what showed me how good PT was? THIS SEASON.....forte was the better running back last year no matter how many stats you spin to go your way.......im over it but you cant seem to drop it.....thats fine tho

i told you i was basing my opinion on the games that ive seen.......im just tired of having to explain myself when i point out several times that its just my opinion......and you try to pretend like my opinion is actually wrong.....maybe you can try to prove me wrong tho....go ahead......you're going to anyway

Tobias-Reiper · 12-01-2009, 11:16 PM

Originally Posted by CantonLegend

...and you try to pretend like my opinion is actually wrong....

I don't try to pretend anything.

12-01-2009, 05:13 PM	#21
SaintPauly Senior Citizen Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gulfport, MS Posts: 3,180 Blog Entries: 1	Re: First Take.... Originally Posted by Euphoria I don't see why you take what they have to say so personal. It doesn't matter... all that matters is we keep winning and get that win that game they call the Super Bowl. Doesn't matter what anyone has to say right now. Leave it on the field and the rest will take care of itself. Depth is over-rated also. Its all realitve, who ever is in the game has to make plays period. Brees gets hurt we'll see how is talking depth then. Euph... Why is it when I bring up a valid argument, on a issue that I feel is important, you say I'm taking it personally? There are many posts on here, regarding the Saints, that can be regarded as "personal" statements. Thus the whole idea behind a "saints forum". A place to discuss, share, and even vent sometimes. That's what this board has been since I joined it, when did that change? How boring would this place be, if all we do is come in and talk stats all the time? And depth over rated? Are you serious? COME ON MAN!
	What's popular is not always right, and what's right is not always popular.....

12-01-2009, 05:25 PM	#22
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: First Take.... Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper And you are basing these observations on... ? i just wanted you to reply so badly and try to prove me wrong with stats or something else ridiculous you think you could come up with to convince me that i am wrong and have always been that way or maybe it was from watching the games goof jared allen>will smith jared allen>charles grant pat williams>sed Pat williams>remi pat williams>pressley kevin williams>sed kevin williams>remi kevin williams>pressley AP>PT AP>bell AP>bush AP>hamilton saints>vikings
	Last edited by CantonLegend; 12-01-2009 at 05:27 PM..

12-01-2009, 08:37 PM	#23
SaintPauly Senior Citizen Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gulfport, MS Posts: 3,180 Blog Entries: 1	Re: First Take.... ok, i have some stats myself. The Saints have 1489 rush yards, split between Bell, Thomas, and Bush. The Vikes have 1329, between Peterson, and their back up, with Peterson having 1084 by himself. That means the back up, has only 208 yards on his own. Now, if we are going to say, that if Brees goes down, we would be hurting, you will also have to say the same about Peterson. Either way, we still have more rushing yards, total, and our backs stay fresher longer, because it's not all on one guy to make it happen. The only edge, that Minnesota has on us, is their D-line, I will give them that, but that's it. Would it be a good game, yes, but over all better than us, is ridiculous.
	What's popular is not always right, and what's right is not always popular.....

12-01-2009, 08:46 PM	#24
mighty12 500th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 980 Blog Entries: 1	Re: First Take.... So I never do this type of thing but I just had to send an email to that TOOL, and since they wouldn't post it on the show I will post it here for your viewing pleasure. "So all last week Who Dat nation had to listen to some of your joke NFL 'analysts' talk about how the Saints defense would be no match for New England, especially the secondary, and then what happened? They Saints dominated the passing game of Tom Brady and destroyed the Pats. Now, instead of giving the Saints props we have to deal with talk about the Vikings being more complete? You are a joke!"

12-01-2009, 08:51 PM	#25
SaintPauly Senior Citizen Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gulfport, MS Posts: 3,180 Blog Entries: 1	Re: First Take.... Excellent mail bro. Doubtful they will even care. ESPN is the VH1 of sports reporting. They are more worried about creating drama, out of situations, instead of just reporting the facts. Like yesterday, reporting something about Tiger Woods, that they read off the TMZ website. What's that all about? What's next, reports from myspace?

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-01-2009, 10:06 PM	#26
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: First Take.... Originally Posted by CantonLegend i just wanted you to reply so badly and try to prove me wrong with stats or something else ridiculous you think you could come up with to convince me that i am wrong and have always been that way or maybe it was from watching the games goof jared allen>will smith jared allen>charles grant pat williams>sed Pat williams>remi pat williams>pressley kevin williams>sed kevin williams>remi kevin williams>pressley AP>PT AP>bell AP>bush AP>hamilton saints>vikings Geez, dude. Don't get so touchy just because I schooled you with the PT-Forte thing I just asked you a question: what are you basing your statements on? That's all. Are you basing them on greater-than signs?

12-01-2009, 10:35 PM	#27
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: First Take.... Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper Geez, dude. Don't get so touchy just because I schooled you with the PT-Forte thing I just asked you a question: what are you basing your statements on? That's all. Are you basing them on greater-than signs? lmao you sure showed me...... you know what showed me how good PT was? THIS SEASON.....forte was the better running back last year no matter how many stats you spin to go your way.......im over it but you cant seem to drop it.....thats fine tho i told you i was basing my opinion on the games that ive seen.......im just tired of having to explain myself when i point out several times that its just my opinion......and you try to pretend like my opinion is actually wrong.....maybe you can try to prove me wrong tho....go ahead......you're going to anyway
	"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd

12-01-2009, 11:16 PM	#28
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: First Take.... Originally Posted by CantonLegend ...and you try to pretend like my opinion is actually wrong.... I don't try to pretend anything.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode