Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Glass half empty?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I tend to look at things as the glass being half full most of the time. However, at present, with Sharper and Ingram I am sensing the glass is half empty. Payton said there are three options for both; 1. ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2010, 12:34 PM   #1
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,680
Glass half empty?

I tend to look at things as the glass being half full most of the time. However, at present, with Sharper and Ingram I am sensing the glass is half empty.

Payton said there are three options for both;

1. put them on the 53 man roster
2. PUP
3. Waive

I do not see #1 happening as the Saints would be on the "hook" for their entire salary for the year if they go on the 53 for week one. Plus they take up two roster spots from "HEALTHY" players.

This leaves #2 and #3.

#2 PUP, shelves them for six weeks into the schedule...with no guarantee. Pay their salaries for six weeks with no assurances they can get on the field.

#3 Waivers. Payton is not very subtle. This may very well be the only option at this point. They could resign both at any point after the first game and not be on the "hook" for their annual salary. Plus, who is going to claim two gimpy legged players?

Anybody else with a half glass viewpoint?

Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over, over, and over again...and expecting a different outcome!
biloxi-indian is offline  
Latest Blogs
Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


What i tell you ! !! ! Last Blog: 11-02-2014 By: SAINTstunna


MID TERM ELECTION Last Blog: 10-29-2014 By: teddybarexxx


Old 08-31-2010, 01:41 PM   #2
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,455
Blog Entries: 5
I don't have an opinion on Ingram but I have a funny feeling Sharper is a Go for game time against the Vikes.
Euphoria is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 01:42 PM   #3
100th Post
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 166
With really nothing to go on for Ingram, I wouldn't be surprised if they outright cut him, but I think Sharper will probably be put on the PUP list. Maybe Ingram will be put on the PUP list as well, but we'll have to see.
DRsaints is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 03:35 PM   #4
Pink Nightmare
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,897
Blog Entries: 7
I agree with Euph. I think Sharper is ready to go. All smoke and mirrors.
SapperSaint is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 03:45 PM   #5
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,067
Blog Entries: 27
Has anyone seen sharper on the practice field?
xan is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 03:49 PM   #6
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 3,747
i read somewhere that they were both just up to speed to start evaluation.
st thomas is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 05:08 PM   #7
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOLA
Posts: 1,640
Originally Posted by st thomas View Post
i read somewhere that they were both just up to speed to start evaluation.

I think I saw what you saw, Payton said they were both finally making some noticeable progress, and the evals would commence beginning now.
73Saint is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 05:27 PM   #8
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southlake, TX
Posts: 1,680
Smile

Originally Posted by xan View Post
Has anyone seen sharper on the practice field?
I have seen pictures of Sharper on the sidelines with a huge knee brace and/or riding a bicycle. Does that count as being on the practice field?
biloxi-indian is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 07:44 PM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richland, MS.
Posts: 1,829
I can give Sharper the benefit of doubt and say he doesn't need practice at this stage in his career, however it's not looking too good for him. I still do not believe he makes the opening day roster and feel he is going to go on the pup list. I seriously hope my prediction is wrong and that he is a go for the Vikings game. As for Ingram, I just don't know much about him to form an opinion. The Saints aren't exactly loaded at LB, so that should help his cause.
MatthewT is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:19 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by biloxi-indian View Post
I tend to look at things as the glass being half full most of the time. However, at present, with Sharper and Ingram I am sensing the glass is half empty.

Payton said there are three options for both;

1. put them on the 53 man roster
2. PUP
3. Waive

I do not see #1 happening as the Saints would be on the "hook" for their entire salary for the year if they go on the 53 for week one. Plus they take up two roster spots from "HEALTHY" players.

This leaves #2 and #3.

#2 PUP, shelves them for six weeks into the schedule...with no guarantee. Pay their salaries for six weeks with no assurances they can get on the field.

#3 Waivers. Payton is not very subtle. This may very well be the only option at this point. They could resign both at any point after the first game and not be on the "hook" for their annual salary. Plus, who is going to claim two gimpy legged players?

Anybody else with a half glass viewpoint?
Who cares? If they aren't healthy then they cant play, and why would we want them anyway? Go with the better options of healthy players. They will probably just roll the dice on someone else not signing them and cut them in hopes of picking them up later in the year. Im about over Sharper anyway.
504state is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts