Delhomme Loses Game 37-17

tweeky · 10-20-2003, 01:58 PM

A 2 possession lead will kill almost any running game.

Shows you how awesome Deuce is. We\'ve been behind most of the year and he still puts up impressive stats.
He could have had 200 yards in that game if we didn\'t put Ki-Jana Carter in.

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-20-2003, 02:49 PM

Here\'s the deal with the Carolina Defense. They sell out stopping the run and rushing the passer. They must do this because their secondary is SLOW. To have any chance at stopping the passing game, Carolina\'s defense must get pressure on the QB. Now, they have been very successful doing this, but it is starting to catch up with them. There defense is ranked way down there because they have given up yardage BIG TIME in the passing game.

There are some things I feel we can do to take advantage of Carolina\'s agressive defense:

1. Let Brooks run. They had lots of trouble with McNair running.

2. We need to somehow get the screen pass going. Why we can\'t do this, I don\'t know, but it would really help slow the blitz.

3. Spread the field with 4 and 5 receivers. This instantly creates them problems. They just do not have the guys in their secondary to hang with our receivers.

[Edited on 20/10/2003 by BillyCarpenter1]

seraph33 · 10-20-2003, 06:16 PM

You must have been using your experience with chemistry to cook up that crack you been smokin\'

Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments.

BlackandBlue · 10-20-2003, 06:23 PM

Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments.

Pthppppppttttttt!

Please! This place has me shaking my head every single day. I could easily choke on all the bad grammar, liken to the time I choked on George\'s momma (Now, I could have left this last statement open ended, thus allowing young George to come back with another brilliant statement about one of his three favorite topics- the parental figure. However, I decided to up the anty and play that card)

[Edited on 20/10/2003 by BlackandBlue]

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-20-2003, 06:34 PM

You must have been using your experience with chemistry to cook up that crack you been smokin\'

Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments.

Damn -- What do you want? Even Michael Jordan has a bad game every once in a while. If some of these other guys would pick up the slack, I might be able to get away with some stuff in here every once in a while.

There ain\'t no \'I\' in team and it ain\'t no \'We\' either --

lsusurfer · 10-20-2003, 07:12 PM

there\'s a me in team though.....

WhoDat · 10-20-2003, 09:23 PM

\"Delhomme loses in that stat that matters most -- Wins and losses. Right?\"

Hhhmmm. I don\'t normally get dragged into these anymore, but I haven\'t had much fun with Billy recently, so...

what you\'re saying is that Delhomme, at 5-1, is a better QB than Brooks is at 3-4. I\'ll buy that - he is. Further, if DELHOMME lost that game, then Brooks should be benched b/c who cares about poor defensive play or dropped passes. The QB does it himself right Billy? That\'s what you would have us believe - BROOKS scored 27 TDs and threw for all those yards last year right? The TEAM had nothing to do with that. By the way, how does Brooks rank in those stats this season?

Delhomme threw for 362 yards and two scores (0 INTs) despite the fact that the Titans were daring him to make plays. The Titans took away the Panthers\' strength - Stephen Davis. They did the same to us by taking away Deuce. Brooks really stepped it up in that game throwing for 185 yards and one touchdown. Quite literally, Delhomme played TWICE as well in the SAME situation, with LESS talent than Brooks. Where ya at William?

[Edited on 21/10/2003 by WhoDat]

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-21-2003, 06:52 AM

WhoDat -- First of all -- I don\'t think that wins and losses are ALL on the QB. That was you and others posting that garbage. Look WhoDat -- You know the how this game of football works. The QB get\'s all the blame and all the glory, but they don\'t deserve either one most of the time.

What do you mean Jake has no talent on offense. Steve Smith is a probowl receivers. Stephen Smith is a probowl running back. Mussin Muhhamad is a very good receiver also. And let\'s not forget that the Panthers have one of the best, if not the best, offensive line in the league. What they are missing is a QB like Aaron Brooks. Where ya at Dat?

WhoDat · 10-21-2003, 09:02 AM

I don\'t have to come back with anything. You talked about the Panthers - not Brooks or Delhomme. The numbers speak for themselves. Delhomme was twice the QB in his game against the Titans with a less \"explosive\" (is that word better for you Billy?) team than Brooks was. Delhomme is better.

saintfan · 10-21-2003, 09:05 AM

Damn whodat...looks like we need to reserve another room for you at Betty Ford. Jeesh, that \"08\" Kool-Aid is worse than crack!

:P

10-20-2003, 01:58 PM	#21
tweeky 500th Post Join Date: May 2003 Location: South Alabama Posts: 779	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 A 2 possession lead will kill almost any running game. Shows you how awesome Deuce is. We\'ve been behind most of the year and he still puts up impressive stats. He could have had 200 yards in that game if we didn\'t put Ki-Jana Carter in.

10-20-2003, 02:49 PM	#22
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Here\'s the deal with the Carolina Defense. They sell out stopping the run and rushing the passer. They must do this because their secondary is SLOW. To have any chance at stopping the passing game, Carolina\'s defense must get pressure on the QB. Now, they have been very successful doing this, but it is starting to catch up with them. There defense is ranked way down there because they have given up yardage BIG TIME in the passing game. There are some things I feel we can do to take advantage of Carolina\'s agressive defense: 1. Let Brooks run. They had lots of trouble with McNair running. 2. We need to somehow get the screen pass going. Why we can\'t do this, I don\'t know, but it would really help slow the blitz. 3. Spread the field with 4 and 5 receivers. This instantly creates them problems. They just do not have the guys in their secondary to hang with our receivers. [Edited on 20/10/2003 by BillyCarpenter1]
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-20-2003, 06:16 PM	#23
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 You must have been using your experience with chemistry to cook up that crack you been smokin\' Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments.

10-20-2003, 06:23 PM	#24
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments. Pthppppppttttttt! Please! This place has me shaking my head every single day. I could easily choke on all the bad grammar, liken to the time I choked on George\'s momma (Now, I could have left this last statement open ended, thus allowing young George to come back with another brilliant statement about one of his three favorite topics- the parental figure. However, I decided to up the anty and play that card) [Edited on 20/10/2003 by BlackandBlue]

10-20-2003, 06:34 PM	#25
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 You must have been using your experience with chemistry to cook up that crack you been smokin\' Just when i thought this forum was at a loss for intelligent comments. Damn -- What do you want? Even Michael Jordan has a bad game every once in a while. If some of these other guys would pick up the slack, I might be able to get away with some stuff in here every once in a while. There ain\'t no \'I\' in team and it ain\'t no \'We\' either --
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-20-2003, 07:12 PM	#26
lsusurfer Registered Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 74	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 there\'s a me in team though.....
lsusurfer Registered Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 74

10-20-2003, 09:23 PM	#27
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 \"Delhomme loses in that stat that matters most -- Wins and losses. Right?\" Hhhmmm. I don\'t normally get dragged into these anymore, but I haven\'t had much fun with Billy recently, so... what you\'re saying is that Delhomme, at 5-1, is a better QB than Brooks is at 3-4. I\'ll buy that - he is. Further, if DELHOMME lost that game, then Brooks should be benched b/c who cares about poor defensive play or dropped passes. The QB does it himself right Billy? That\'s what you would have us believe - BROOKS scored 27 TDs and threw for all those yards last year right? The TEAM had nothing to do with that. By the way, how does Brooks rank in those stats this season? Delhomme threw for 362 yards and two scores (0 INTs) despite the fact that the Titans were daring him to make plays. The Titans took away the Panthers\' strength - Stephen Davis. They did the same to us by taking away Deuce. Brooks really stepped it up in that game throwing for 185 yards and one touchdown. Quite literally, Delhomme played TWICE as well in the SAME situation, with LESS talent than Brooks. Where ya at William? [Edited on 21/10/2003 by WhoDat]
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

10-21-2003, 06:52 AM	#28
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 WhoDat -- First of all -- I don\'t think that wins and losses are ALL on the QB. That was you and others posting that garbage. Look WhoDat -- You know the how this game of football works. The QB get\'s all the blame and all the glory, but they don\'t deserve either one most of the time. What do you mean Jake has no talent on offense. Steve Smith is a probowl receivers. Stephen Smith is a probowl running back. Mussin Muhhamad is a very good receiver also. And let\'s not forget that the Panthers have one of the best, if not the best, offensive line in the league. What they are missing is a QB like Aaron Brooks. Where ya at Dat?
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-21-2003, 09:02 AM	#29
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 I don\'t have to come back with anything. You talked about the Panthers - not Brooks or Delhomme. The numbers speak for themselves. Delhomme was twice the QB in his game against the Titans with a less \"explosive\" (is that word better for you Billy?) team than Brooks was. Delhomme is better.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

10-21-2003, 09:05 AM	#30
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Damn whodat...looks like we need to reserve another room for you at Betty Ford. Jeesh, that \"08\" Kool-Aid is worse than crack! :P