Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
View Poll Results: What position(s) are priority for the Saints ?
Defensive Tackle 25 32.05%
Defensive End 26 33.33%
Outside Linebacker 43 55.13%
Running Back 25 32.05%
Wide Receiver 3 3.85%
Offensive Line 11 14.10%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Saints Draft

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; We must draft Quinton Carter...teamed with Malcolm Jenkins...Oh schiottski......

Like Tree1Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2011, 02:22 PM   #111
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
We must draft Quinton Carter...teamed with Malcolm Jenkins...Oh schiottski...
jeanpierre is offline  
Old 01-20-2011, 02:30 PM   #112
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
carter would be nice, a beast in the making
st thomas is offline  
Old 01-21-2011, 10:22 PM   #113
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
East-West Shrine Game: 2011 NFL Draft Preparation Continues

East-West Shrine Game: 2011 NFL Draft Preparation Continues - SBNation.com
jeanpierre is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 11:07 AM   #114
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
As sweet as it would be to get a big-time RB or a great safety with our first round pick, the fact remains that the way you win football games is with a strong pass rush. This team's defensive ends were pretty much non-existent this season (Will Smith had 5.5 sacks, and faced a lot of double teams because Alex Brown did nothing). If this team can get a pass rushing threat to complement Will Smith, it will make our secondary look much better.

I do think we need to invest a second or third round pick in a running back.

My list of priorities: DE, OLB, RB, S
TheDeuce is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 12:57 PM   #115
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,355
Blog Entries: 34
The way our oline got tooled, especially both our tackles, makes that need glaring. We shouldnt have to rely on a once in a generation back to create a running game. How about a line that can move a de out of the way? Or one that gives brees more than 2.5 seconds out of the gun.
xan is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 05:59 PM   #116
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
We didn't run because we didn't have a Running Back; Ivory, Thomas were Rookie FA's behind this line...

We need a big RB to complement Reggie, Pierre/Ivory...
jeanpierre is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 07:34 PM   #117
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
we'll find a jewel without using a needed pick at rb. defense is a must.
st thomas is offline  
Old 01-23-2011, 07:36 AM   #118
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Originally Posted by st thomas View Post
we'll find a jewel without using a needed pick at rb. defense is a must.
But we keep forgetting about free agency. This team ALWAYS addresses weaknesses in free-agency allowing us to pick BPA on draft day.

By draft day we may already have secured an OLB and a DE and a DT.

So I like to look at the draft in terms of which players fit best, and will succeed in our system. Just about every position is an option in round one except QB/OG/OC/K/P/FB

But if we do wanna talk current needs and the draft, RB may very well be a need if Bush and PT don't return, and a player like Mark Ingram would be perfect in Payton's system. He's a stronger and faster version of PT. I'll take that all day long and then some.
Danno is online now  
Old 01-26-2011, 03:36 PM   #119
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,681
BPA is BPA for me. If Blaine Gabbert fell down to 24 and we took him, I for one would not crucify our front office. Draft is supposely very deep as far as the DL is concerned, I'm certain we'll get some quality players even if we waited a round.

As long as we don't bust a Sebastian Janikowski in the first round and I'll be okay with whomever our front office chooses.
papz is offline  
Old 01-26-2011, 05:33 PM   #120
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
How bad is that Al Woods trade looking?
TheDeuce is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts