Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Sean Payton on Role of Chris Ivory.

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by BringTheWood Our defense was clearly the weak link. We had no trouble scoring points, we had trouble stopping them. We were ranked 11th best in offensive points scored per game We were ranked 7th best in defensive ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2011, 03:44 PM   #11
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Originally Posted by BringTheWood View Post
Our defense was clearly the weak link. We had no trouble scoring points, we had trouble stopping them.
We were ranked 11th best in offensive points scored per game

We were ranked 7th best in defensive points given up per game
Danno is offline  
Old 04-01-2011, 04:59 PM   #12
100th Post
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 446
Originally Posted by BringTheWood View Post
Our RBs will be healthy, and between the 4 of them, including Lynell I think we can do good things. Our defense was clearly the weak link. We had no trouble scoring points, we had trouble stopping them.
I'm curious, what makes you think our RBs will be healthy this year? Do you see them getting tougher than they have been the past three seasons? Do you see other team's defenses getting weaker? Based on their historical records, the RBs being healthy this year is as likely as the Saints being able to draft Patrick Peterson with the 24th pick. The fact is this group of RBs has NEVER had a season where they didn't all miss games. Counting on it to be otherwise is a wish. Do you realize the last RB the team had suit up for all 16 games was Aaron Stecker in 2007?

I know that the defense wasn't stellar, but what about the 4th and 1 we couldn't convert in the playoff game against Seattle? What about the fact that the team was ranked 28th in the league in rushing yards per game and 24th in rushing TDs per game?

Look, I'm not saying the D doesn't need help, but it seems like many people are looking back on the feel good story of the undrafted Thomas and how he helped the team win it all and thinking it's going to happen again. Take off the rose colored glasses people! This isn't a re-run of Rudy! Being able to run the ball when you need to (and when the other team knows you need to) is very important in football. Quit nickle-and-diming the position and get a real RB!
SAINT_MICHAEL is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 04:36 PM   #13
Senior Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 3,180
Blog Entries: 1
I think if Ingram is there at 24, you gotta take him. I don't see him lasting that long, but that would be ludicrous to pass him up. Ingram, Bush, Ivory, and Thomas? Are you freaking kidding me?
SaintPauly is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 06:40 PM   #14
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Originally Posted by strato View Post
Ingram over a stud OLB?...naw i will take P.T ..Bush Ivory and a good back in the later rounds..
Well Strat it all comes down to value.

If the front office feels there's not much difference between OLB#3 and OLB# 12, but Ingram is a top 10 talent, of course you take Ingram over a LB.

Conversely, if there's an OLB with an equal garde as Ingram, you take the LB.

It all depends on the Saints draft board. I personally feel that IF INGRAM SLIPS, he'll likely have a much higher grade than any other player when we pick.
Danno is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 06:50 PM   #15
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Originally Posted by strato View Post
OLB or bust
So you'd prefer a LB with a 3rd round grade over a stud 1st round RB?
Danno is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 07:08 PM   #16
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
We need another RB; but not at the expense of a R1 pick.

First Round Picks, if a franchise is to be successful, must play 8-10 years for that franchise or get equal value in a trade.

Running backs with very, very few exceptions, only last 5-6 years nowadays...

Ingram is a good back; while he won't be there, the earliest I'd pick 'em is in late Round 2...
jeanpierre is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 10:19 PM   #17
Pink Nightmare
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,028
Blog Entries: 7
Ivory has a history of being injured.

Reggie has a history of being injured.

PT..... well, I just don't believe the sprained ankle deal

I don't know guys and gals. I for one am tired of us running out of running backs; and then we go and shop for has-beens. JMO, my brothers and sisters.
SapperSaint is offline  
Old 04-03-2011, 06:24 PM   #18
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 36,958
Blog Entries: 29
This dude was available to us a few years back ...
Clay Matthews, LB for the Green Bay Packers at NFL.com
We sure could use a guy like that if he were available at 24.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 04-03-2011, 09:56 PM   #19
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,982
He'll be a great one
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 04-03-2011, 09:58 PM   #20
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,530
Blog Entries: 3
Still need another RB
saintsfan1976 is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
chris ivory, sean payton

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts