Poll (Round 2)

BillyC · 12-08-2003, 08:50 PM

3) You clearly are hell bent on putting blame for the season on everyone else but AB. But when it mattered AB failed in the Biggest game of the season. His fumbles put the Saints in bad positions all game long. It doesn\'t matter what the defense did because the offense couldn\'t score with AB at the QB position.

Gator, clearly you have no idea what you\'re talking about as far as who I blame. But just to make you happy, I said Brooks cost us the game yesterday. Him alone. No one else. I have said that Brooks has cost us 2 games that I am aware of. If there are more, show and prove to me and I will admit that to. I hope you find some comfort in the fact that I place blame where it goes. I do all the time. I also ain\'t so stupid that I don\'t see other problems on the team. Unlike so many.

Now, my advice to you is to actually read what I post. I say negitive things about Brooks. Not as much as you because there is too much of it on here already. I do defend him when I don\'t feel it is justified. Of course I know you feel all of it is justified. But, I don\'t. Maybe, I\'ll start going behind everyone of your posts and start calling you the most negitive poster on here like others have done. But, I won\'t. I will disagree with you or anyone else and state the reasons why I think so. If you have a problem with this then you will have to deal with it the best way you can.

BillyC · 12-08-2003, 08:52 PM

Billy - you don\'t think Jim Haslett or Aaron Brooks have anything to do with the Saints\' problems - or maybe very little to do with them. Everyone else seems to disagree. That\'s not a rip, it\'s a statement of fact.

Tell us again about how the Saints are going to be 13-3 and Brooks is going to go to the Pro Bowl! I love that one!

I\'ve already said I want Haslett gone. I\'ve already said that Brooks has cost us 2-games that I am aware of. If you have some proof that Brooks cost us more games then show me and I\'ll say the samething. . I\'d rather not.

[Edited on 9/12/2003 by BillyC]

[Edited on 9/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

lumm0x · 12-08-2003, 08:58 PM

There were alot of opportunities for alot of players to make a play count yesterday and they failed to do so. This game was a one play loss. Anyone of them could have turned it around and they didn\'t. Brooks had the hottest first quarter I\'ve ever seen him play. He is usually not hot until the 2nd half. They he self destructed. But there were alot of times that a single play would have changed the game. Brooks most blatantly cost us this one but anyone of the other 21 starters had their chance to make that one signifigant player to turn the momentum. Some did and some didn\'t. Brooks was on the didn\'t side.

I agree, the guy sucked it up for most of the game. He looked confused by the defense and the coverage. We beat ourselves. I still like Brooks. When he\'s on he\'s on but........I can\'t stand inconsistency. I\'d rather have a less talented but more consistent QB. As for individual turnovers, you are not making adequate comparisons unless you review each one. Big difference between unforced and forced.

BlackandBlue · 12-08-2003, 10:46 PM

This thread got interesting while I was gone.

:P

12-08-2003, 08:50 PM	#21
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Poll (Round 2) 3) You clearly are hell bent on putting blame for the season on everyone else but AB. But when it mattered AB failed in the Biggest game of the season. His fumbles put the Saints in bad positions all game long. It doesn\'t matter what the defense did because the offense couldn\'t score with AB at the QB position. Gator, clearly you have no idea what you\'re talking about as far as who I blame. But just to make you happy, I said Brooks cost us the game yesterday. Him alone. No one else. I have said that Brooks has cost us 2 games that I am aware of. If there are more, show and prove to me and I will admit that to. I hope you find some comfort in the fact that I place blame where it goes. I do all the time. I also ain\'t so stupid that I don\'t see other problems on the team. Unlike so many. Now, my advice to you is to actually read what I post. I say negitive things about Brooks. Not as much as you because there is too much of it on here already. I do defend him when I don\'t feel it is justified. Of course I know you feel all of it is justified. But, I don\'t. Maybe, I\'ll start going behind everyone of your posts and start calling you the most negitive poster on here like others have done. But, I won\'t. I will disagree with you or anyone else and state the reasons why I think so. If you have a problem with this then you will have to deal with it the best way you can.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-08-2003, 08:52 PM	#22
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Poll (Round 2) Billy - you don\'t think Jim Haslett or Aaron Brooks have anything to do with the Saints\' problems - or maybe very little to do with them. Everyone else seems to disagree. That\'s not a rip, it\'s a statement of fact. Tell us again about how the Saints are going to be 13-3 and Brooks is going to go to the Pro Bowl! I love that one! I\'ve already said I want Haslett gone. I\'ve already said that Brooks has cost us 2-games that I am aware of. If you have some proof that Brooks cost us more games then show me and I\'ll say the samething. . I\'d rather not. [Edited on 9/12/2003 by BillyC] [Edited on 9/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-08-2003, 08:58 PM	#23
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	Poll (Round 2) There were alot of opportunities for alot of players to make a play count yesterday and they failed to do so. This game was a one play loss. Anyone of them could have turned it around and they didn\'t. Brooks had the hottest first quarter I\'ve ever seen him play. He is usually not hot until the 2nd half. They he self destructed. But there were alot of times that a single play would have changed the game. Brooks most blatantly cost us this one but anyone of the other 21 starters had their chance to make that one signifigant player to turn the momentum. Some did and some didn\'t. Brooks was on the didn\'t side. I agree, the guy sucked it up for most of the game. He looked confused by the defense and the coverage. We beat ourselves. I still like Brooks. When he\'s on he\'s on but........I can\'t stand inconsistency. I\'d rather have a less talented but more consistent QB. As for individual turnovers, you are not making adequate comparisons unless you review each one. Big difference between unforced and forced.

12-08-2003, 10:46 PM	#24
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Poll (Round 2) This thread got interesting while I was gone. :P

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey