New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Is this logical??? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/3676-logical.html)

saintfan 01-26-2004 10:06 AM

Is this logical???
 
What you want me to do, Whodat, is come up with a number. You\'re a numbers guy when it suits you. I could ask you the same question about Jake and what would you say?

I\'ll say that, based entirely on YOUR logic, Brooks must be responsible for all the wins the Saints had this year, since he touches the ball more than any other player. But that can\'t really be true can it? Of course it can\'t, since it takes a running game, and recievers, and blockers, and coaches. See how deformed your logic can be?

And to think it was YOUR question that pointed it out.

WhoDat 01-26-2004 11:10 AM

Is this logical???
 
So then how did YOU determine that Jake had won the Panthers more than one game this season?

That whole long post is little more than yet another attempt to AVOID THE QUESTION. Why can you not answer a simple question? B/c you shot yourself in the foot and you know it.

That\'s OK Saintfan, I\'ll have the crow sent to your house - I won\'t make you eat it here in front of everyone.

Skewed logic or not, you used it to credit Delhomme with numerous Carolina wins. I didn\'t make that logic up - in fact, your post was one meant to counter my previous comments. So that logic is entirely yours. Now, I ask you to apply the same logic to Aaron Brooks. Knowing full well that if you were to do that you could not honestly credit Brooks with more wins than Delhomme, you choose to avoid the question rather than admit that Jake might have anything that Aaron does not. Now whose agenda is clear?

saintfan 01-26-2004 11:17 AM

Is this logical???
 
Whodat, you sound more like 08 with every post. Funny...

All I said was I DIDN\'T say Jake was only responsible for one of the Panthers wins. You then started spewing as normal. I challenged you to verify a quote you failed to verify. You deferred and rather than admit (initially) that you posted nonesense you asked me a silly question. Anyone who reads the whole thread knows why.

A QB, as we all know, must perform for his team to win; HOWEVER, as we (most of us anyway) all know it takes more than JUST the QB to win the game. I watched Jake move his team down the field this year more than once, so OBVIOUSLY he\'s had more to do with more than just one win. I\'d say the same thing about Brooks. You won\'t, however, because you can\'t. Fairplay isn\'t in your makeup.

Your whole question was designed to be antagonistic...and way to keep from admiting you pulled a quote out of thin air...go ahead and admit that while you\'re at it...k?

ColdFusion 01-26-2004 11:23 AM

Is this logical???
 
Ease up boys.

WhoDat 01-26-2004 08:14 PM

Is this logical???
 
WhoDat: \"Interesting, so how many wins do you feel Delhomme was responsible for then?\"

Saintfan: \"I haven\'t thought about it really. I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\"

OK, so by \"I\'d say more than one without blinking\" as an answer to my question about how many wins YOU FELT DELHOMME WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR, you DID NOT in fact mean that he was responsible for any? That\'s what I\'m supposed to get out of the last post. That even though you said that Delhomme was responsible for \"more than one\", you in fact meant none. Just trying to clarify here Saintfan b/c your last statement stands in stark contrast to some of the previous posts earlier in this thread.

You are right about one thing though, anyone who reads the thread will see what has happened. I already apologized for misconstruing a quote that I DID produce. You say you meant something different than how I interpreted it. Fine. I\'ll admit that I misconstrued it. Can you please now explain how I am misconstruing \"I\'d say more than one without blinking tho...\"?? Thanks.

codename47 01-26-2004 08:25 PM

Is this logical???
 
when I was young, it seemed life was so wonderful, a miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical...

BlackandBlue 01-27-2004 08:31 AM

Is this logical???
 
...but then you grow older, more cynical, and start hating the human race.

WhoDat 01-27-2004 01:17 PM

Is this logical???
 
Still no answer I see.

saintfan 01-27-2004 04:42 PM

Is this logical???
 
The answer is 6. That leaves one for Duece and one for the defense.

WhoDat 01-27-2004 04:57 PM

Is this logical???
 
And how did you arrive at this number of six?

How did you arrive at the opinion of \"more than one\" for Jake?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com