Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers

WhoDat · 02-02-2004, 08:56 AM

In any event, my team didn\'t make it to the super bowl this year, but the look on Jake\'s face when the game winning field goal went through the uprights made me almost as happy.

Agenda much? This entire thread screams of agenda. I mean, if Brooks had thrown for 320+ yards, 3 TDs and 0 INTs in ANY game we\'d be hearing about how great he is from Billy. Factor in the BEST defense in the league and it being in the Super Bowl and I don\'t care what his completion percentage was he played quite well. Especially considering Jake carried the team. Where was that running game that got them to the Super Bowl? I didn\'t see much of it. A couple of big runs on Patriots breakdowns, but that\'s about it. By the way Billy, after what was definitely a bad start Delhomme\'s completion percentage was 62%.

One word: AGENDA. There is no doubt in my mind now that you are a Jake hater and clearly look at Brooks with skewed perspective. Brooks fumbles three times in a game and it\'s the receivers fault for dropping this pass or that one. Delhomme throws for 320 yards and 3 TDs, brings his team back on huge scoring drives TWICE late in the game, and it is HIS fault they lost? AGENDA.

SFinAustin · 02-02-2004, 08:56 AM

I would like to observe that all of this \"Delhomme sucks\" sort of language from the \"Dreaming of long showers with Brooks\" crowd doesn\'t change two key facts.

1. Delhomme was in the superbowl.
2. Even if Delhomme sucks, it\'s doesn\'t make Brooks a better QB.

And in the same breath, just because was \"in\" the Superbowl, that doesn\'t make Brooks a bad QB. I\'ve always wondered, where\'s the connection? There isn\'t any!

BillyC · 02-02-2004, 09:00 AM

is this guy married to brooks? he sees another qbs NAME and he freaks out like a jealous wife..

which reminds me, yall see that commercial with the ref getting screamed at by the coach.. \"where does he learn to take this abuse....\" ..

that was hilarious

Sal --

We don\'t call folks names or BELITTLE them here at B&G. Actions could be taken, so be careful.

jm · 02-02-2004, 09:05 AM

I just asked a question , I didn\'t say you called anyone a loser.

As far as Brooks goes, he exceded my expectations of 5 - 11 so give him a bonus!

sal · 02-02-2004, 09:22 AM

just so it doesnt go on my \'permanent record\'...

WhoDat · 02-02-2004, 10:09 AM

William? Care to comment on my post or are you waiting for Saintfan to come in and save you from the big bad Whodat?

Don\'t expect that to happen. Here\'s what your buddy in the SUnshine Club had to say about Jake:

\"They had no running game and their line wasn\'t blocking very well at all, and Jake kept comin\' back. In my opinion, had it not been for Jake the Panthers would have been out of that game early in the 3rd quarter...game over. \"

\"I\'ll go on record and say that Jake Delhomme is one hell of a football player.\"

\"Had the Panters won that game (and Jake didn\'t loose it for \'em) there\'s no question who the MVP of the Superbowl would have been. \"

\"Finally, in a game that was supposed to suck, I think it was one of the best Superbowls I\'ve ever seen, and Jake is the guy, in my opinion, that made that happen. He just woulnd\'t let his team lose. For those of you who have stubbornly supported Jake, let me say I still think Brooks should be the Saints QB, but as I\'ve said before, I\'m all about credit where credit is due, and Jake Delhomme deserves a LOT of credit. More than winning or losing yesterday, Jake proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he belongs in the NFL as a starting QB. I\'m still glad the Panthers lost, but I have a new respect for Jake Delhomme. \"

Billy? Billy? <crickets chirping> Another owned picutre?!?! Two in one day? That would be a record even for you BC.

[Edited on 2/2/2004 by WhoDat]

saintz08 · 02-02-2004, 11:45 AM

Only Billy,

ROFLMAO

\"That was the toughest team that we\'ve played all season,\" Brady said. \"They made some really big plays. Jake Delhomme threw the crap out of it, which you don\'t see very much on our defense.\"

The compliment hardly was consolation for Delhomme, who completed 16 of 33 passes for 323 yards and three touchdowns. His 113.6 passer efficiency rating actually was better than Brady\'s 100.5.

ROFLMAO

seraph33 · 02-02-2004, 04:42 PM

Billy grow up

WhoDat · 02-02-2004, 04:57 PM

No comment from the great BillyC? He doesn\'t want to backup his statement that Jake single-handedly lost the Super Bowl for Carolina with his 113 efficiency rating, 323 yards, and 3 TDs? Billy? <crickets chirping>

Billy? <ribbit, chirp>

OWNED.

saintz08 · 02-02-2004, 05:34 PM

You da man Billy . :thumbup:

Delhomme\'s performance will go down in the history books as one of the greatest ever in a losing effort. However, it\'s the winning team that\'s most always remembered first.

http://www.superbowl.com/news/story/7055821

02-02-2004, 08:56 AM	#11
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers In any event, my team didn\'t make it to the super bowl this year, but the look on Jake\'s face when the game winning field goal went through the uprights made me almost as happy. Agenda much? This entire thread screams of agenda. I mean, if Brooks had thrown for 320+ yards, 3 TDs and 0 INTs in ANY game we\'d be hearing about how great he is from Billy. Factor in the BEST defense in the league and it being in the Super Bowl and I don\'t care what his completion percentage was he played quite well. Especially considering Jake carried the team. Where was that running game that got them to the Super Bowl? I didn\'t see much of it. A couple of big runs on Patriots breakdowns, but that\'s about it. By the way Billy, after what was definitely a bad start Delhomme\'s completion percentage was 62%. One word: AGENDA. There is no doubt in my mind now that you are a Jake hater and clearly look at Brooks with skewed perspective. Brooks fumbles three times in a game and it\'s the receivers fault for dropping this pass or that one. Delhomme throws for 320 yards and 3 TDs, brings his team back on huge scoring drives TWICE late in the game, and it is HIS fault they lost? AGENDA.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

02-02-2004, 08:56 AM	#12
SFinAustin 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 176	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers I would like to observe that all of this \"Delhomme sucks\" sort of language from the \"Dreaming of long showers with Brooks\" crowd doesn\'t change two key facts. 1. Delhomme was in the superbowl. 2. Even if Delhomme sucks, it\'s doesn\'t make Brooks a better QB. And in the same breath, just because was \"in\" the Superbowl, that doesn\'t make Brooks a bad QB. I\'ve always wondered, where\'s the connection? There isn\'t any!
SFinAustin 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 176

02-02-2004, 09:00 AM	#13
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers is this guy married to brooks? he sees another qbs NAME and he freaks out like a jealous wife.. which reminds me, yall see that commercial with the ref getting screamed at by the coach.. \"where does he learn to take this abuse....\" .. that was hilarious Sal -- We don\'t call folks names or BELITTLE them here at B&G. Actions could be taken, so be careful.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

02-02-2004, 09:05 AM	#14
jm 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 133	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers I just asked a question , I didn\'t say you called anyone a loser. As far as Brooks goes, he exceded my expectations of 5 - 11 so give him a bonus!
jm 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 133

02-02-2004, 09:22 AM	#15
sal Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers just so it doesnt go on my \'permanent record\'...
sal Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

02-02-2004, 10:09 AM	#16
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers William? Care to comment on my post or are you waiting for Saintfan to come in and save you from the big bad Whodat? Don\'t expect that to happen. Here\'s what your buddy in the SUnshine Club had to say about Jake: \"They had no running game and their line wasn\'t blocking very well at all, and Jake kept comin\' back. In my opinion, had it not been for Jake the Panthers would have been out of that game early in the 3rd quarter...game over. \" \"I\'ll go on record and say that Jake Delhomme is one hell of a football player.\" \"Had the Panters won that game (and Jake didn\'t loose it for \'em) there\'s no question who the MVP of the Superbowl would have been. \" \"Finally, in a game that was supposed to suck, I think it was one of the best Superbowls I\'ve ever seen, and Jake is the guy, in my opinion, that made that happen. He just woulnd\'t let his team lose. For those of you who have stubbornly supported Jake, let me say I still think Brooks should be the Saints QB, but as I\'ve said before, I\'m all about credit where credit is due, and Jake Delhomme deserves a LOT of credit. More than winning or losing yesterday, Jake proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he belongs in the NFL as a starting QB. I\'m still glad the Panthers lost, but I have a new respect for Jake Delhomme. \" Billy? Billy? <crickets chirping> Another owned picutre?!?! Two in one day? That would be a record even for you BC. [Edited on 2/2/2004 by WhoDat]
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. ThatÃ¢Â€Â™s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans SaintsÃ¢Â€Â™ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse \"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"

02-02-2004, 11:45 AM	#17
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers Only Billy, ROFLMAO \"That was the toughest team that we\'ve played all season,\" Brady said. \"They made some really big plays. Jake Delhomme threw the crap out of it, which you don\'t see very much on our defense.\" The compliment hardly was consolation for Delhomme, who completed 16 of 33 passes for 323 yards and three touchdowns. His 113.6 passer efficiency rating actually was better than Brady\'s 100.5. ROFLMAO
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020

02-02-2004, 04:42 PM	#18
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers Billy grow up

02-02-2004, 04:57 PM	#19
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers No comment from the great BillyC? He doesn\'t want to backup his statement that Jake single-handedly lost the Super Bowl for Carolina with his 113 efficiency rating, 323 yards, and 3 TDs? Billy? <crickets chirping> Billy? <ribbit, chirp> OWNED.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

02-02-2004, 05:34 PM	#20
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Jake loses the Super Bowl for Panthers You da man Billy . :thumbup: Delhomme\'s performance will go down in the history books as one of the greatest ever in a losing effort. However, it\'s the winning team that\'s most always remembered first. http://www.superbowl.com/news/story/7055821
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020