Being supremely better in certain aspects of your game doesn't make the team complete. We do however have had some holes in certain areas(mainly the defense) that have been exploited. I'm not saying we are better or worse than the Packers or the Patriots, that isn't the point I'm trying to make(as I'd love to have the opportunity to see us play both of them). I'm just saying we have some kinks we are working out in some areas that have led to us having to alter our offensive gameplan.

In real life or fantasy??

In real life - Drew. His leadership skills, on the field presence, his demeenor, his service to the community, etc.

Rogers is a brash fukstick & I hate that in any player (Graham comes a little close to jackass sometimes)

In fantasy I would barely give the nod to ROgers because Drew can/does throw a few more ints (BUT - In 4 leagues I have Drew in 2 of them)

:bng:

Wow in only his second post.

I don't know if he just hasn't go up on us before he posts are it is sure going to take the heat off me from time to time, lol.

Its a loaded question because its not about the QB's! Its about who and what you put around them. Rodgers is great an elite QB. Rodgers played for the Saints I don't think we'd have that many wins as we do now. This team is all Brees. Rodgers wouldn't fit the locker room.

I'd take Rogers because he is younger and I can get 6 more good years out of him? Brees what 2 more left?

Brees in GB's system yeah they'd still be undefeated.

Of course Brees!

Aaron Rodgers just reeks ******* in every way! There is a thin line between confidence and arrogance, he is on the wrong side of that line...

Rogers is riding the hype wagon right now. He didn't look so great vs the Vikes to me.
Besides you would be silly to take Rogers over Brees. Rogers only has 1 SB like Brees but Brees started on a crapy Chargers team and brought them to a playoff. Rogers started on a playoff caliber team.
Plus Brees QB accomplishment make Rogers look like a 2nd string QB on the leaders boards. In Fact Brees holds more records than Manning, and is a lot more accurate, better leader, and more intelligent than Rogers. Brees all the way.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/

Rodgers is incredible and may be the best QB in the league right now, but I have to take Brees for two reasons: 1. Brees is a better leader, and 2. Brees isn't a HUGE DOUCHE!

This has to be the most one sided answer to a question I think I've ever seen on here. Brees for on and off the field. Rodgers is younger, maybe better to a lot of people outside of a Saint fan.
No way in Hell would I pick anyone but Brees for this team. How can you look at yourself in a mirror and ask a question like that? Sorry But BREES all day long and Twice on Sunday!! WHO DAT

I love Drew, I love our team....if your being unbiased you have to go with Rodgers. have you watched his first 7 games?

If your unbiased you have to go with the stats. Brees is only 31, and at the top of his game. He has 6 more good years in him. Rogers doesn't come close to Brees stats, and is still developing. Its also obvious that Brees is more intelligent , better leader, more accurate, and consistent year to year.
Rogers just has a better arm, and throws less interceptions.

If I were drafting a QB I would have to take Brees over rogers ,because I would know Brees will preform at a high level, bring the team together as a leader, and would put in the extreme effort to learn our team offense.
If you hadn't noticed, Brees dosnt use a play wrist band like a lot of QB's in the NFL, he memorizes it.
Im not even sure Rogers could understand Paytons offense or the huge/complicated playbook we have.

Its Brees all the way for exactly the reasons many of you have said. Just b/c most of the analysts and media tend to downplay him for whatever reasons, no one has done it better than Brees since hes come to the Saints.