Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

James Thrash

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; in fact, im sorry i even said all that, i mean i must have forgot my place as a saints fan and how i want them to lose. Who\'s turn is it to burp and change the new guy?...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2004, 08:48 AM   #11
Kinder, gentler
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
James Thrash

in fact, im sorry i even said all that, i mean i must have forgot my place as a saints fan and how i want them to lose.
Who\'s turn is it to burp and change the new guy?
BlackandBlue is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 11:41 AM   #12
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 96
James Thrash


Who\'s turn is it to burp and change the new guy?

sarcasam BnB? should one of these new guys help you find your bifocals? check between your woodburning stove and your 1980\'s playoff aspirations.


anda special note:
not one of us wants to see this team to win more than any one else does.
jbutts is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 11:43 AM   #13
Kinder, gentler
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
James Thrash

sarcasam BnB? should one of these new guys help you find your bifocals? check between your woodburning stove and your 1980\'s playoff aspirations.
Sir, I\'ll have you know that my stove is coal drivin, not wood.

not one of us wants to see this team to win more than any one else does.
Good point, and one that seems to have been lost on a few here recently.
BlackandBlue is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 12:35 PM   #14
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 189
James Thrash


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sarcasam BnB? should one of these new guys help you find your bifocals? check between your woodburning stove and your 1980\'s playoff aspirations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yeehaw!!! How buot whoopin up some chow on that coal stove. I need some vittles. Thrash sucks, Pinkston suck, Mitchell sucks. Keep em away. I don\'t think we need to waste any more free agent money on WR\'s. Last I checked we had a pretty good crew. Sure they had an off year. They will be fine. Get the \"D\" in line first and their wont be so much pressure on the offense. Then they can have fun and put up \'02 numbers again.

O1higuy
o1higuy is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 02:14 PM   #15
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 96
James Thrash


Sir, I\'ll have you know that my stove is coal drivin, not wood.

my apologies to you and your coal.
jbutts is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 05:40 PM   #16
100th Post
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 255
James Thrash

Thrash is going to be the number two guy... they don\'t have intentions on getting rid of him. Bring in a threat like TO and now you have just another weapon.
deadflatbird is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 08:26 PM   #17
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
James Thrash

Thrash will not be in Philly next year, that\'s for sure. He is definitely the odd man out, that\'s why Philly offered him, and a 5th round pick to San Fran before they made the trade w/ Baltimore.

Why are we even talking about Thrash? We don\'t need any WRs. We need to concentrate on our D. If there\'s anything we\'ve learned in recent years is that defense wins Super Bowls.
26DEUCE26 is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 09:54 PM   #18
Nose Digger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 341
James Thrash

Please, anybody but Thrash....If Philly don\'t want him, then that is saying something.
Boogro is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 10:32 PM   #19
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 96
James Thrash

Please, anybody but Thrash....If Philly don\'t want him, then that is saying something.

the reason isnt that they dont want them, but they have TO now, pinkston is young with tremendous potential; Mitchell came on strong in the second half of last season, so that leaves Thrash as the number four guy, with his salary they cant afford to keep him on the bench to let their investments get on the field.
all im saying is he might be a good number 2.
a cheap number 2 if our organization plays it right.
jbutts is offline  
Old 03-19-2004, 08:42 AM   #20
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 189
James Thrash

Why even bother with him. We have already gambled on Crowell which may or may not pay off. Horn, Stallworth, Pathon, and lets not forget Lewis. Why waste the money. Just cause its cheap I guess.
o1higuy is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts