Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Full statement from the NFL on the Saints 'bounty' program

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; A lengthy investigation by the NFL’s security department has disclosed that between 22 and 27 defensive players on the New Orleans Saints, as well as at least one assistant coach, maintained a “bounty” program funded primarily by players in violation ...

Like Tree2Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2012, 08:40 PM   #1
Threaded by WhoDat!656
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 15,998

Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

A lengthy investigation by the NFL’s security department has disclosed that between 22 and 27 defensive players on the New Orleans Saints, as well as at least one assistant coach, maintained a “bounty” program funded primarily by players in violation of NFL rules during the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons, the NFL announced today.

The league’s investigation determined that this improper “Pay for Performance” program included “bounty” payments to players for inflicting injuries on opposing players that would result in them being removed from a game.

The findings – corroborated by multiple independent sources – have been presented to Commissioner Roger Goodell, who will determine the appropriate discipline for the violation.

“The payments here are particularly troubling because they involved not just payments for ‘performance,’ but also for injuring opposing players,” Commissioner Goodell said. “The bounty rule promotes two key elements of NFL football: player safety and competitive integrity.

“It is our responsibility to protect player safety and the integrity of our game, and this type of conduct will not be tolerated. We have made significant progress in changing the culture with respect to player safety and we are not going to relent. We have more work to do and we will do it.”

Full article.
The full statement from the league on the Saints

Last edited by papz; 03-06-2012 at 07:12 AM..
Views: 2505
Old 03-05-2012, 08:46 PM   #2
Mmm That Smell!
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Metairie Terrace
Posts: 3,073
Good lookin out 656!

I don't know if I want to or could understand what i'm gonna read.
RockyMountainSaint is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 08:53 PM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,776
Blog Entries: 15
Ok, but the investigation still has yet to show if any Saints players actually collected from the program for any 'knockout' or 'cart-off' hits.

Everyone understands pay-for-performance in the NFL is wrong, but was anybody ever actually taken out of the game because of a 'bounty' hit by the Saints?

I'm sure players received payments for fumble recoverys, interceptions, tackles, et ... every team does it, but to keep emphasizing intent to injure without citing the examples of it is inflammatory, IMO.

Seems to me the league office is more worried about the fact "Non-contract Bonus Payments" were made.
RockyMountainSaint likes this.
SloMotion is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 08:58 PM   #4
Mmm That Smell!
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Metairie Terrace
Posts: 3,073
5. Although head coach Sean Payton was not a direct participant in the funding or administration of the program, he was aware of the allegations, did not make any detailed inquiry or otherwise seek to learn the facts, and failed to stop the bounty program. He never instructed his assistant coaches or players that a bounty program was improper and could not continue.

How can you prove this?
Only if ALL of the asst Coaches AND Sean Payton admitted that this was the case. One "Fly in the Ointment" kills this assertion!

I do believe that this junk happened but, HOW DO YOU HAVE AN AIRTIGHT CASE? The assumption of guilt by Goodell is enough in this case......

I'm no one.
Who are you?
RockyMountainSaint is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:22 PM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,494
"Commissioner Goodell also advised the Saints that he is retaining jurisdiction and reserving his authority to impose further discipline if additional information comes to his attention."

And what if it turns out these accusations were overblown. Can he reserve his authority to reverse discipline? Doubt he'd ever do that...
LivnaLieTimay is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:56 PM   #6
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,494
The NFL's statement translated in English:

A rat with some grudge against the Saints organization went to the NFL office and told his side of the story, the NFL believed every word. They then used trumped up terminology to make their findings seem more legit.

Look, I'm not saying some of this stuff happened but I doubt that everything mentioned in the 50,000 page investigation is true. I just think if you're going to throw an organization under the bus you have to release more than just a vague statement. Show me some video, receipts, audio tapes with proof.
Jankman8 likes this.
LivnaLieTimay is offline  
Old 03-05-2012, 10:56 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,982
Originally Posted by RockyMountainSaint View Post
5. Although head coach Sean Payton was not a direct participant in the funding or administration of the program, he was aware of the allegations, did not make any detailed inquiry or otherwise seek to learn the facts, and failed to stop the bounty program. He never instructed his assistant coaches or players that a bounty program was improper and could not continue.

How can you prove this?
Only if ALL of the asst Coaches AND Sean Payton admitted that this was the case. One "Fly in the Ointment" kills this assertion!

I do believe that this junk happened but, HOW DO YOU HAVE AN AIRTIGHT CASE? The assumption of guilt by Goodell is enough in this case......

Dam were in trouble.
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 03-06-2012, 07:42 AM   #8
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
I think we are in big trouble. This is going to sting for a long time.
Ashley is offline  
Old 03-06-2012, 07:48 AM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,469
Yes Mr. Goodell, but the Saints were incapable of delivering those hits and in fact did not deliver those hits and therefore the bounties that you speak of were never paid because they were never earned so how is a bounty system possible when the players never actually got said bounties because they were incapable of actually making those types of plays?? Nor did they make those kinds of plays.
Marlboro Man is offline  
Old 03-06-2012, 08:53 AM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,417
Originally Posted by SloMotion View Post
Ok, but the investigation still has yet to show if any Saints players actually collected from the program for any 'knockout' or 'cart-off' hits.
But SloMotion, it doesn't matter if anyone collected from the program or not. As bad as our defense has been the last couple of years, I doubt that anyone did collect. But the fact that money was on the table is what's wrong. I think this is not going away just because players didn't collect. This is going to be around and will be hurting us for a long time.
Srgt. Hulka is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/41793-full-statement-nfl-saints-bounty-program.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Full statement from the NFL on the Saints 'bounty' program This thread Refback 03-05-2012 09:04 PM 10


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts