New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Unofficial Official Poll (https://blackandgold.com/saints/43634-unofficial-official-poll.html)

Seer1 05-02-2012 09:26 AM

Unofficial Official Poll
 
How many players will godell make sit out once he decides they exuberantly embraced the bounty thing?

TheOak 05-02-2012 09:38 AM

My official unofficial Saints dice rolled a 3.

http://stores.geauxforthegold.com/ca...uzzyDice_1.jpg

pherein 05-02-2012 09:44 AM

As many as it takes to feed godells ego.

1 suspended with proof of wrong doing. Sorry Vilma, but that was just stupid.
21-26 players with possible suspensions with no proof, and having never been questioned.

TheOak 05-02-2012 09:48 AM

My vote is exactly one less than it takes to field a defense for season play.

There is a lot more to this than just a number when it comes to how it will or will not affect our play.
  • He could suspend 10 staggered through out the season.
  • He could suspend 1 and the NFLPA appeal could put it off for a year.
  • Since a lot of this is distributed through out three years, he could take a few seasons to distribute the suspensions.

He could shock and awe the NFL nation by suspending players that are on other teams that either played for the Saints in that three year period or players that have publicly admitted to it.

sharke 05-02-2012 09:54 AM

2, Vilma & Smith. Rest will get fines.

FinSaint 05-02-2012 10:19 AM

I'd like for there to be an option for "none" since that is what I'm hoping for, and recent signs may prove that to be a well founded hope.


But, I voted for 1 - Vilma as the ring leader and scapegoat, so that Goodell is able to save some face.

CharityMike 05-02-2012 10:29 AM

2 - Vilma and Harper

TheOak 05-02-2012 10:32 AM

Very difficult for me to imagine Vilma and Smith get dinged and not Fujita.

Srgt. Hulka 05-02-2012 10:33 AM

I picked 4. I have no reason to believe 4 will be suspended other than a gut feeling. Goodell suspends too few, and everybody else in the league sees it as a slap on the wrist. Suspend too many, and everybody sees it as the dictator bringing down the heavy fist of the all powerfull NFL. So I think 4 is a good middle of the road number.

lumm0x 05-02-2012 10:34 AM

I picked 3. One from each level of the D. Vilma for 6 games, Harper for 3 and Smith for 2.

|Mitch| 05-02-2012 10:38 AM

I'm picking 3; Vilma because he allegedly put up 10k, Harper because the couple of late hit flags he received, and Greer because he put himself in the spotlight with the bounty poem thing.

I'm just guessing here :doh:

CharityMike 05-02-2012 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumm0x (Post 402486)
I picked 3. One from each level of the D. Vilma for 6 games, Harper for 3 and Smith for 2.

I could see this. If this is what it would take for this crap to go away, I'd be cool with it.

sharke 05-02-2012 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x626xBlack (Post 402482)
Very difficult for me to imagine Vilma and Smith get dinged and not Fujita.

Fujita fessed up right away. Apparently that's all Goodell needs.

saintfan 05-02-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x626xBlack (Post 402466)
My official unofficial Saints dice rolled a 3.

http://stores.geauxforthegold.com/ca...uzzyDice_1.jpg

Isn't that 4? I was never very good with math...

:dunce:

SaintsBro 05-02-2012 11:08 AM

I have Vilma and Harper down as definites on my little list; the rest are maybes. But remember how NOBODY guessed the suspensions for Payton, Loomis, Vitt and Williams correctly, everybody underestimated how bad it would be, including myself.

For that reason I am a pessimist, and I could easily see Vilma being done with football, which gets appealed into 1 year, and Harper getting a year, which gets knocked down to 10 or 12 games. Others getting 6, 8 games, stuff like that. It will suck.


BUT... I still believe this, that if the Saints had fired Loomis and Payton on the spot when this story broke back in the beginning of March, which is what Goodell wanted Tom Benson to do, then the player suspensions would have been lighter and faster and this would all be over with by now... This delay in the suspensions is mostly about making Mickey Loomis' job harder and more uncomfortable for him, affecting the draft, negatively influencing the deal with Brees, aimed at formulating discontent among the fans towards Loomis, keeping it in the news, etc. etc. They are hoping that eventually Tom Benson will say "enough" and can Loomis. Problem solved, as far as the league is concerned.

Notice how they said cryptically a few weeks ago, that the door was open to re-evaluating the Saints draft picks next year, they might give them back to us, depending on how the league felt the Saints were handling the situation. That is CODE SPEAK for, "fire Payton and Loomis, and maybe we'll give you back your draft picks."

Also it's weird how they are hardly mentioning Gregg Williams at all, you're not hearing a peep about him from the league or in the media, and they are already talking about his "rehabiliation." Which is really odd, since he was the ringleader and orchestrator of it all, you would think the league would be all hot and bothered about persecuting him.

But they could care less about him, this whole thing is all about sending a personal message from Roger Goodell to Sean Payton and Mickey Loomis. For being "arrogant" and "disrespecting the shield" and whatever else. The ideal outcome for Roger Goodell would be for him to be rid of those two, that has been pretty clear from day one in all of this.

So now I actually kinda think that the suspensions will not come down until a while from now, maybe even the first week of the season, while Loomis is gone, so it fricks the Saints over completely, and makes people blame Mickey Loomis even more. That's what Goodell really wants, is not to hurt Benson or the Saints, he wants Loomis' and Payton's heads on a stake. If Loomis had already been fired a month ago, I get a real feeling the suspensions would be very mild and already would have been announced by now. That's just my take on it.

TheOak 05-02-2012 11:25 AM

Can you add 16 to the list for me please?

CharityMike 05-02-2012 11:32 AM

Almost got it right. What the hell did Smith do?

TheOak 05-02-2012 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintfan (Post 402496)
Isn't that 4? I was never very good with math...

:dunce:

My good eye was closed.:broccoli:

|Mitch| 05-02-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharityMike (Post 402549)
Almost got it right. What the hell did Smith do?

guilt by association?

sharke 05-02-2012 11:48 AM

I named the 2 Saints suspended, I get a prize right?

CharityMike 05-02-2012 11:53 AM

HALO!!! SHOW HIM WHAT HE'S WON!!!

Rugby Saint II 05-02-2012 12:30 PM

Five. Not exactly a guess.

Srgt. Hulka 05-04-2012 01:21 PM

Are people still voting on this? The news has been out for two days now.


Oh, and by the way, my gut feelings rarely lie to me. :jester:


Quote:

Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka (Post 402485)
I picked 4. I have no reason to believe 4 will be suspended other than a gut feeling. Goodell suspends too few, and everybody else in the league sees it as a slap on the wrist. Suspend too many, and everybody sees it as the dictator bringing down the heavy fist of the all powerfull NFL. So I think 4 is a good middle of the road number.


alexonfyre 05-05-2012 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka (Post 403517)
Are people still voting on this? The news has been out for two days now.


Oh, and by the way, my gut feelings rarely lie to me. :jester:

I voted today, since I already knew the answer and wanted to skew the data so that we all look more prescient in the future.

Srgt. Hulka 05-05-2012 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexonfyre (Post 403794)
I voted today, since I already knew the answer and wanted to skew the data so that we all look more prescient in the future.

http://www.ar15armory.com/forums/sty...anim_rofl2.gif

skymike 05-09-2012 07:29 PM

Polls are so awesome. I think we need MORE!

st thomas 05-11-2012 10:01 AM

well i kind of knew already. but still fun, its like i was holding a cheat sheet

UK_WhoDat 05-14-2012 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skymike (Post 404587)
Polls are so awesome. I think we need MORE!

Yeah!

We could have a poll of what sorta polls we should have :bng:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com