New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Article: Some 'Bountgate' Saints still fighting mad: Railroaded by NFL? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/44015-some-bountgate-saints-still-fighting-mad-railroaded-nfl.html)

biloxi-indian 05-21-2012 02:28 PM

Some 'Bountgate' Saints still fighting mad: Railroaded by NFL?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Players say they have seen the discipline letters from the NFL to the Saints' Sean Payton, Gregg Williams, Joe Vitt and Mickey Loomis. They claim those letters don't simply state the allegations and the imposed punishment. They claim the letters tell the four men, in general terms, that if they stay mostly quiet, the league will let them back into the sport after a certain number of games. (The NFL denied this, but wouldn't address other claims by Saints players.)

Some 'Bountgate' Saints still fighting mad: Railroaded by NFL? - NFL - CBSSports.com News, Rumors, Scores, Stats, Fantasy

SapperSaint 05-21-2012 02:35 PM

Can you guys tell me what that ever growing pile of poop is over there in the corner???? People are starting to stare.

SaintsRule11 05-21-2012 02:53 PM

The worm has turned.

Rugby Saint II 05-21-2012 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintsRule11 (Post 406984)
The worm has turned.

I always wondered how do you tell the head from the tail on a worm?;)

saintfan 05-21-2012 03:11 PM

The whole thing is a sad farce. The NFLs angle is transparent. It's a friggin joke, and Saintfan is an angry young (okay not so young) man...

LivnaLieTimay 05-21-2012 03:32 PM

It would have been nice if some of these "writers" did their homework from the start. It's unfortunate for the Saints organization and us fans because the only people reading these articles are Saints fans. Fans from others teams and the mainstream media chopped us down and moved on assuming everything they heard 2 months ago was true. While its nice to see articles questioning Goodell, it frustrates me knowing its not getting anywhere near the publicity the story got 2 months ago.

Dasidreidia 05-21-2012 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintfan (Post 406987)
The whole thing is a sad farce. The NFLs angle is transparent. It's a friggin joke, and Saintfan is an angry young (okay not so young) man...

Would that perchance be a Styx reference good sir?

saintfan 05-21-2012 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dasidreidia (Post 407011)
Would that perchance be a Styx reference good sir?

The "young punk" got it! The rest of you old timers should be very ashamed. :cool:

Tobias-Reiper 05-21-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintfan (Post 407025)
The "young punk" got it! The rest of you old timers should be very ashamed. :cool:

...some of us old timers didn't listen to anything softer than The Clash. :)

saintfan 05-21-2012 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 407027)
...some of us old timers didn't listen to anything softer than The Clash. :)

You didn't stand by me, Reiper. No. Not at all...

WhoDat!656 05-21-2012 05:14 PM

Report: Saints players believe they’re being “railroaded”
 
As the bounty case continues to bounce back and forth between simmer and full boil, a strong undercurrent of discontent continues to linger among the ranks of the men who still play for the Saints organization.

According to Mike Freeman of CBSSports.com, multiple unnamed members of the team privately have complained about the situation.

“Everyone in the bounty case is being railroaded,” one unnamed Saints player told Freeman. “I can’t believe this is happening.”

Report: Saints players believe they

Halo 05-21-2012 05:25 PM

Time difference between 09 playoffs and 2012
 
I cannot wrap my head around this single fact:

If the NFL knew about Vilma offering 10k to "knock out" Kurt Warner and Favre, why would they wait 2.5 years to punish Vilma??

It DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER!!!!!

CheramieIII 05-21-2012 05:37 PM

Commish overstepped this time. He must have a concussion.

Beastmode 05-21-2012 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halo (Post 407035)
I cannot wrap my head around this single fact:

If the NFL knew about Vilma offering 10k to "knock out" Kurt Warner and Favre, why would they wait 2.5 years to punish Vilma??

It DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER!!!!!

the Director of the Vermont School of Law, Michael McCann, spoke specifically about this. If the NFL had critical information early on and allowed it to continue they are going to get waylaid with more lawsuits.

McCann however is leaning towards Goodell being able to avoid Vilma's suit but that depends on how things are interpreted in the CBA as for what Vilma can and can't do. Right now it's a gray area. It really could go either way.

saintfan 05-21-2012 06:10 PM


Beastmode 05-21-2012 06:48 PM

<

Halo 05-21-2012 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 407041)
McCann however is leaning towards Goodell being able to avoid Vilma's suit but that depends on how things are interpreted in the CBA as for what Vilma can and can't do. Right now it's a gray area. It really could go either way.

Agreed, but this is where I completely disagree with McCann. The Case specifically names Vilma vs. Goodell, in a personal liability lawsuit.

The case gives the court personal jurisdiction over Goodell. The case names Goodell as an individual person, it does not mention the NFL, therefore the CBA is not in play.

For the NFL to enter the case, Goodell must prove he made decisions based on what his employer (the NFL) instructed him to do... but Goodell IS THE AUTHORITY for the NFL, therefore he IS personally responsible.

AsylumGuido 05-21-2012 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintfan (Post 407025)
The "young punk" got it! The rest of you old timers should be very ashamed. :cool:

Oh, I got it. I was back stage in 1977 at one of their Grand Illusion tour stops in Greenville, NC. They were fronted by Charlie. We partied with the Charlie gang after the concert.

Beastmode 05-21-2012 08:20 PM

I'm with you Halo, that's why it's going to be interesting to see how RG responds. We are going to get a clearer picture of how the NFL hierarchy works in these matters. Does RG call the shots and everyone else is just yes men, or, does he present it to a board. How much power does he actually have. I know he has a lot but what is the role of the owners in all this is what I'd like to know. I'm sure the owners are not just turning on ESPN and saying there's our boy.

Rugby Saint II 05-21-2012 08:22 PM

Some one is getting caught with his hand in the cookie jar..........

hagan714 05-21-2012 08:48 PM

hate to say it but every thing is riding on vilma

frankeefrank 05-21-2012 09:09 PM

Just want to commend all you Saints fans. We asked questions, before making a judgment. It's probably because we bleed black and gold, but it's prudent none the less. This is gone blow up in the face of the league and we will be rewarded. You guys rock

SapperSaint 05-22-2012 08:33 AM

Here is another monkey wrench to throw into the mix.

Ok, if Roger knew two years ago the Saints were doing this; and did nothing about it back then. Doesn't that make Roger and the NFL resposible for players who recieved concussions during those two years? In a "scumbag" lawyers eyes, doesn't that make you foam at the mouth to go out and find players who got a concussion while playing the Saints.

saintfan 05-22-2012 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SapperSaint (Post 407152)
Here is another monkey wrench to throw into the mix.

Ok, if Roger knew two years ago the Saints were doing this; and did nothing about it back then. Doesn't that make Roger and the NFL resposible for players who recieved concussions during those two years? In a "scumbag" lawyers eyes, doesn't that make you foam at the mouth to go out and find players who got a concussion while playing the Saints.

He says he only acted when he obtained 'indisputable' ... uhh ... 'evidence'. He also says the NFL has been clear and transparent with its ... uhh ... 'evidence'. If true he ain't got nothing but hearsay...

Halo 05-22-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintfan (Post 407178)
He says he only acted when he obtained 'indisputable' ... uhh ... 'evidence'. He also says the NFL has been clear and transparent with its ... uhh ... 'evidence'. If true he ain't got nothing but hearsay...

...and they acted as soon as possible (2.5 years). If he knew there was a Play to Injure problem 2.5 years ago and investigated it, then YES I believe the floodgates of litigation could possibly open due to the "fiction" the NFL has created.

mutineer10 05-22-2012 01:17 PM

My 666th post appears in a thread exposing a 2.5 year lapse of judgement by Their Satanic Majesties Request, upon which my favorite tune is She's A Rainbow, which was featured in a commercial for the Apple iMac G3, the G3 being a common reference to Germany, France & the UK - the three most influential nations in the EU, with the UK being the birthplace of the Rolling Stones, whose 1967 release Their Satanic Majesties Request featured the tune She's A Rainbow, and so on ...

saintfan 05-22-2012 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mutineer10 (Post 407197)
My 666th post appears in a thread exposing a 2.5 year lapse of judgement by Their Satanic Majesties Request, upon which my favorite tune is She's A Rainbow, which was featured in a commercial for the Apple iMac G3, the G3 being a common reference to Germany, France & the UK - the three most influential nations in the EU, with the UK being the birthplace of the Rolling Stones, whose 1967 release Their Satanic Majesties Request featured the tune She's A Rainbow, and so on ...

You are doomed. Better get a lawyer. I'm not sure why, but I figure you're going to need one. LOL


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com