League presents evidence to group of reporters

WhoDat!656 · 06-18-2012, 05:51 PM

King said the 2009 playoff bounty on Brett Favre was actually $35,000, not $10,000 and also that Roman Harper was due $1,000 for knocking Giants running back Brandon Jacobs out of a game.

League presents evidence to group of reporters | ProFootballTalk

SmashMouth · 06-18-2012, 06:00 PM

[IMG]

[/IMG]

saintfan · 06-18-2012, 06:02 PM

Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing?

SmashMouth · 06-18-2012, 06:04 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing?

Because it is hearsay, rather manufactured, and not actual evidence. This meets the three calendar day rule, right?

saintfan · 06-18-2012, 06:09 PM

I see - like trying to taint the Jury? If that's accurate - if it's true that they cannot use this 'evidence'...well, but then why couldn't they...

they are, after all, using evidence that wasn't in their possession when they actually punished people...

But I mean, oh hell I don't know. Now I'm more confused than normal...

WhoDat!656 · 06-18-2012, 06:10 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing?

You get three guesses and the first two don't count!

SmashMouth · 06-18-2012, 06:18 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

I see - like trying to taint the Jury? If that's accurate - if it's true that they cannot use this 'evidence'...well, but then why couldn't they...

they are, after all, using evidence that wasn't in their possession when they actually punished people...

But I mean, oh hell I don't know. Now I'm more confused than normal...

If they actually had it, they were compelled to turn it over 3 calendar days prior; this means this past Friday. This also means they are pissing in the wind.

AsylumGuido · 06-18-2012, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

Because it is hearsay, rather manufactured, and not actual evidence. This meets the three calendar day rule, right?

They said they showed the same evidence to the reporters that they shared with the players. The fact is that none of it confirms the presence of a bounty system. It could confirm the existence of a pay for performance plan, but that has not been denied.

They did have some "transcription from notes" that implied Vilma, Ornstein, Grant and Vitt gave a total of $35,000 for a hit on Favre, but it was just a typewritten copy of what was supposedly notes from the game.

Solid proof? More like solid bull****.

06-18-2012, 05:51 PM	#1
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,001	League presents evidence to group of reporters King said the 2009 playoff bounty on Brett Favre was actually $35,000, not $10,000 and also that Roman Harper was due $1,000 for knocking Giants running back Brandon Jacobs out of a game. League presents evidence to group of reporters \| ProFootballTalk

06-18-2012, 06:00 PM	#2
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,987 Blog Entries: 29	[IMG][/IMG]

06-18-2012, 06:04 PM	#4
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,987 Blog Entries: 29	Originally Posted by saintfan Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing? Because it is hearsay, rather manufactured, and not actual evidence. This meets the three calendar day rule, right?
	Last edited by SmashMouth; 06-18-2012 at 06:08 PM..

06-18-2012, 06:10 PM	#6
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,001	Originally Posted by saintfan Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing? You get three guesses and the first two don't count!

06-18-2012, 06:18 PM	#7
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,987 Blog Entries: 29	Originally Posted by saintfan I see - like trying to taint the Jury? If that's accurate - if it's true that they cannot use this 'evidence'...well, but then why couldn't they... they are, after all, using evidence that wasn't in their possession when they actually punished people... But I mean, oh hell I don't know. Now I'm more confused than normal... If they actually had it, they were compelled to turn it over 3 calendar days prior; this means this past Friday. This also means they are pissing in the wind.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

06-18-2012, 06:02 PM	#3
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Okay. I'm stupid, so somebody 'spain it to me. Why would the NFL show evidence to a group of reporters that it refuses to show to the players it is punishing?

06-18-2012, 06:09 PM	#5
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	I see - like trying to taint the Jury? If that's accurate - if it's true that they cannot use this 'evidence'...well, but then why couldn't they... they are, after all, using evidence that wasn't in their possession when they actually punished people... But I mean, oh hell I don't know. Now I'm more confused than normal...

06-18-2012, 07:08 PM	#8
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 24,394	Originally Posted by SmashMouth Because it is hearsay, rather manufactured, and not actual evidence. This meets the three calendar day rule, right? They said they showed the same evidence to the reporters that they shared with the players. The fact is that none of it confirms the presence of a bounty system. It could confirm the existence of a pay for performance plan, but that has not been denied. They did have some "transcription from notes" that implied Vilma, Ornstein, Grant and Vitt gave a total of $35,000 for a hit on Favre, but it was just a typewritten copy of what was supposedly notes from the game. Solid proof? More like solid bull****.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44696-league-presents-evidence-group-reporters.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
League presents evidence to group of reporters	This thread	Refback	06-18-2012 06:19 PM	1