Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

New Vilma lawsuit asks for quick appeal ruling

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma is suing the NFL in federal court, claiming Commissioner Roger Goodell failed to make a timely appeal ruling regarding Vilma's season-long suspension in connection with the league's bounty investigation. The lawsuit filed Saturday night in U.S. ...

Like Tree10Likes
  • 1 Post By SmashMouth
  • 1 Post By SmashMouth
  • 1 Post By SmashMouth
  • 3 Post By Halo
  • 1 Post By Rugby Saint II
  • 2 Post By QBREES9
  • 1 Post By pherein

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2012, 02:51 PM   #1
Threaded by SmashMouth
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,815

Blog Entries: 27
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma is suing the NFL in federal court, claiming Commissioner Roger Goodell failed to make a timely appeal ruling regarding Vilma's season-long suspension in connection with the league's bounty investigation.



The lawsuit filed Saturday night in U.S. District Court in New Orleans also asks for a temporary restraining order to allow Vilma to continue working if Goodell upholds the suspension.
The suit contends Goodell has undermined "the integrity of the NFL and the Commissioner's office" by handing down punishments to Vilma and others based on evidence that is either flawed or cannot be substantiated.
It is the second lawsuit Vilma has filed in the matter. The first, filed in May and also in federal court in New Orleans, seeks unspecified damages from Goodell for defamation of character.
In his latest filing, Vilma claims that the NFL's collective bargaining agreement required Goodell to rule as soon as was practical following a June 18 appeal hearing. Because players, in protest, declined to present new evidence or argue their case in the hearing, Goodell should have been able to rule by June 25, the first business day after the record was closed in the matter, the lawsuit argues.
"We have not yet had an opportunity to review Mr. Vilma's improper effort to litigate a matter that is committed to a collectively bargained process," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said. "There is no basis for asking a federal court to substitute its judgment for the procedures agreed upon by the NFL and NFLPA, procedures that have been in place, and have served the game well, for decades."

read more

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	201207010106039774728-p3.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	8.7 KB
ID:	4901  

Halo likes this.
Views: 3568
Latest Blogs
REFUND Last Blog: 12-07-2014 By: xan




Saints: A glimpse of the future Last Blog: 11-19-2014 By: lee909


Old 07-01-2012, 02:58 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,815
Blog Entries: 27
Also here...


Jonathan Vilma files new lawsuit vs. NFL in bounty case - NFL.com

New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma is suing the NFL in federal court, claiming Commissioner Roger Goodell failed to make a timely appeal ruling regarding Vilma's season-long suspension in connection with the league's bounty investigation.

The lawsuit filed Saturday night in U.S. District Court in New Orleans also asks for a temporary restraining order to allow Vilma to continue working if Goodell upholds the suspension.


The suit contends Goodell has undermined "the integrity of the NFL and the Commissioner's office" by handing down punishments to Vilma and others based on evidence that is either flawed or cannot be substantiated.

It is the second lawsuit Vilma has filed in the matter. The first, filed in May and also in federal court in New Orleans, seeks unspecified damages from Goodell for defamation of character.

In his latest filing, Vilma claims that the NFL's collective bargaining agreement required Goodell to rule as soon as was practical following a June 18 appeal hearing. Because players, in protest, declined to present new evidence or argue their case in the hearing, Goodell should have been able to rule by June 25, the first business day after the record was closed in the matter, the lawsuit argues. The NFL has said there is no timetable for a ruling.

Vilma's attorney, Peter Ginsberg, also recently filed a notice with the federal court in Louisiana that Vilma will file for an injunction once Goodell finally rules on the appeals. Once Goodell rules, Vilma will file the lawsuit against him then file an injunction asking that he be allowed to work -- play for the Saints -- until all legal proceedings are completed.

In his latest attack of the NFL's handling of the bounty probe, Vilma contends punished players have only been able to see less than 1 percent of the 18,000 documents the league said it has compiled. His suit also claims that the few key pieces of evidence the league shared are flawed, including printed reproductions of handwritten notes.

Instant Debate: Lord of the ringless
LeBron James finally won his first title. Which NFL player without a ring is under the most pressure to win a Super Bowl? More ...
"The NFL's alteration of other documents evidences that the NFL cannot substantiate the suspension, and undermines the integrity of the process," Vilma's lawsuit states.

Reached early Sunday, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello offered the following statement:

"We have not yet had an opportunity to review Mr. Vilma's improper effort to litigate a matter that is committed to a collectively bargained process. There is no basis for asking a federal court to substitute its judgment for the procedures agreed upon by the NFL and NFLPA, procedures that have been in place, and have served the game well, for decades."

Vilma is one of current and former Saints players suspended for their role in the team's bounty program. Anthony Hargrove was suspended eight games, Will Smith (four) and Scott Fujita (three). Vilma latest filing was done independently of the other three players -- as has been the case with his other filings. Hargrove, Smith and Fujita have not taken any legal action -- yet -- outside of the processes outlined for recourse in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Using lawyers from the NFL Players Association, the players filed two grievances with arbitrators, and lost; and attended an appeal hearing with Goodell but did not defend themselves.

Vilma's lawsuit seeks to discredit a key piece of evidence outlining bounty pledges from before the NFC Championship Game against Minnesota in January 2010, and also takes aim at fired assistant coach Mike Cerullo, who, according to Vilma, produced the document for the league.

Cerullo had a vendetta against the Saints after his firing following the 2009 season, and resented that the Super Bowl ring he received had been made with imitation (cubic zirconia) diamonds, the lawsuit contends.
Halo likes this.

Said Pope Benedict: "WOW ... that ring is bigger than mine!!!"

SmashMouth is offline  
Old 07-01-2012, 03:01 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,815
Blog Entries: 27
And here ...

In his latest filing, Vilma claims that the NFL's collective bargaining agreement required Goodell to rule as soon as was practical following a June 18 appeal hearing. Because players, in protest, declined to present new evidence or argue their case in the hearing, Goodell should have been able to rule by June 25, the first business day after the record was closed in the matter, the lawsuit argues.
It was not clear if the NFL had seen the suit. Messages left with two league spokesmen Saturday night were not immediately returned.
In his latest attack of the NFL's handling of the bounty probe, Vilma contends punished players have only been able to see less than 1 percent of the 18,000 documents the league said it has compiled. His suit also claims that the few key pieces of evidence the league shared are flawed, including printed reproductions of handwritten notes.
"The NFL's alteration of other documents evidences that the NFL cannot substantiate the suspension, and undermines the integrity of the process," Vilma's lawsuit states.
The lawsuit seeks to discredit a key piece of evidence outlining bounty pledges from before the NFC championship game against Minnesota in January 2010, and also takes aim at fired assistant coach Mike Cerullo, who, according to Vilma, produced the document for the league.
Cerullo had a vendetta against the Saints after his firing following the 2009 season, and resented that the Super Bowl ring he received had been made with imitation (cubic zirconia) diamonds, the lawsuit contends.


New Vilma lawsuit asks for quick appeal ruling
Halo likes this.

Said Pope Benedict: "WOW ... that ring is bigger than mine!!!"

SmashMouth is offline  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:41 PM   #4
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 12,077
Blog Entries: 44
All I can say is PILE ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QBREES9, pherein and bobdog86 like this.
Halo is offline  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:42 PM   #5
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 11,730
Sue him and screw him!
bobdog86 likes this.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 07-01-2012, 09:42 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 18,903
Hey Roger you screwed up ! Vilma suspension was improper
Halo and pherein like this.
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 07-01-2012, 09:49 PM   #7
failclownHunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.O. and V.A.
Posts: 1,816
Blog Entries: 3
Halo likes this.

Last edited by pherein; 07-01-2012 at 09:54 PM..
pherein is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/45037-new-vilma-lawsuit-asks-quick-appeal-ruling.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
New Vilma lawsuit asks for quick appeal ruling This thread Refback 07-01-2012 03:50 PM 6


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts