Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Smith, Fujita and Hargrove to file suit by Thursday

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Next phase of bounty case will focus on claim Goodell wasn Now that Commissioner Roger Goodell has ruled on the bounty appeals, the ball is back in the players’ court. And they plan to aim it directly at Commissioner Roger ...

Like Tree3Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2012, 05:33 PM   #1
Mmm That Smell!
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Bucktown Brah!
Posts: 2,370
Smith, Fujita and Hargrove to file suit by Thursday

Next phase of bounty case will focus on claim Goodell wasn
Now that Commissioner Roger Goodell has ruled on the bounty appeals, the ball is back in the players’ court. And they plan to aim it directly at Commissioner Roger Goodell.

To little surprise, the players whose suspensions became official on Tuesday will file a lawsuit challenging the ruling. Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma already has. A source with knowledge of the situation tells PFT that Saints defensive end Will Smith, Packers defensive end Anthony Hargrove, and Browns linebacker Scott Fujita will do the same by Thursday.

The effort will commence, as we previously have explained, with a StarCaps-style effort to block the suspensions until the litigation is resolved. The lawsuit itself will assert that Goodell lacked the requisite impartiality to serve as the arbitrator.

It’s one of the four ways that an arbitration award can be overturned in a court of law, where judges don’t substitute their own judgment but where judges ensure that the arbitrator acted fairly and properly. In this specific case, the players will point to Goodell’s public statements regarding the bounty case as proof that he made up his mind before assuming the role of judge and jury in the appeal process.

The lawsuit also will target the league’s failure to produce within 72 hours before the June 18 appeal hearing the exhibits to be introduced, based on the requirement in the CBA that all exhibits be exchanged within three days before the hearing.

Many will be inclined to fault the players and the NFLPA for taking this approach, arguing that the players should accept the process for which their union bargained under the CBA. But they bargained for a fair and impartial process; if they didn’t get it, they have every right to fight the suspensions on that basis.

I'm no one.
Who are you?
RockyMountainSaint is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:37 PM   #2
11-5
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,567
.... and the legal song and dance continues
RaginCajun83 is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:42 PM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 6,798
About damn time they followed Vilma!
|Mitch| is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 06:04 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 17,104
Blog Entries: 27
Goodell may be broke by the time it is all said and done!
Rugby Saint II likes this.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 06:12 PM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,647
Starcaps was different. The NFL broke state laws. That's why it took so long. It would have to be something along those lines to suspend it. Speaking of Starcaps, I still have not found anything stating what happened to the NFL for breaking a state law..did they pay a fine, did the judge dismiss it....couldn't find anything.

The issue I see with this however is the NFL broke rules within the agreement. Once you do that it opens the door for a breach of contract, even if minor, that could have had an effect on the outcome. It's a stretch but that seems like what the players have to work with.
Beastmode is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 08:05 PM   #6
LET MY TEAM GO!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Just north of COWGAL HELL
Posts: 286
The three day (72 hour) issue could be the initial crack a court needs to open the whole thing up.

The NFL delayed the hearing a few hours, but the player's attorneys could argue that the venue did not allow preparations even with the minimal delay. The delay was basically an attempt to meet the terms of the CBA that had been disregarded.

This is going to get interesting.
TXGSP is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 11:36 PM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 18,108
Lets end all of this, we have camps opening up soon.
QBREES9 is offline  
Old 07-03-2012, 11:44 PM   #8
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,745
Originally Posted by QBREES9 View Post
Lets end all of this, we have camps opening up soon.
Agreed. Minicamps have come and gone.
OldMaid is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 03:44 AM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,647
Worse case, or best case, depending on how you look at it, a judge could rule that the NFL start the whole process over and put all suspensions on hold.
Beastmode is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 07:56 AM   #10
Mmm That Smell!
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Bucktown Brah!
Posts: 2,370
They need Jackie Chiles
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Jackie-Chiles1.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	18.6 KB
ID:	4909  
Ashley likes this.
RockyMountainSaint is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/45102-smith-fujita-hargrove-file-suit-thursday.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Smith, Fujita and Hargrove to file suit by Thursday This thread Refback 07-03-2012 05:35 PM 8


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts