O'Sullivan, Our Hope for a Super Future

BrooksMustGo · 05-15-2004, 09:05 AM

BMG is the one that made it about Brooks in his initial post on this thread. He might have said FUTURE. But, tommorow is the future and he wants to get rid of Brooks yesterday.

Yep. If we could dump Brooks, then it\'s win-win all around. We get either good picks from the Raiders or Woodson or both, so we address our defense. We get rid of a problem player that we pay too much and we get to start a guy who is destined to be a star in this league. I can\'t see any downside to this whole scenario.

lumm0x · 05-15-2004, 09:49 AM

Yep. If we could dump Brooks, then it\'s win-win all around. We get either good picks from the Raiders or Woodson or both, so we address our defense. We get rid of a problem player that we pay too much and we get to start a guy who is destined to be a star in this league. I can\'t see any downside to this whole scenario.

Why would you want to dump a talented, big contract player that you claim is a team cancer, for a talented, equally big contract player who is a team cancer? Both have made equally bone-headed comments, Woodson more visibly anti-team at the worst moments. Moreover, why would you want to reduce the talent of our team at a position of maximum impact to address a position with minimum impact? Maybe we could trade Deuce for Janikowski too and get a top flight kicker in the league? Hell, the future of the Saints running game as we all know is Mike Carney!! He\'s never played a down, but I just know he\'s the second coming of Riggins.

GumboBC · 05-15-2004, 10:12 AM

Why would you want to dump a talented, big contract player that you claim is a team cancer, for a talented, equally big contract player who is a team cancer? Both have made equally bone-headed comments, Woodson more visibly anti-team at the worst moments. Moreover, why would you want to reduce the talent of our team at a position of maximum impact to address a position with minimum impact? Maybe we could trade Deuce for Janikowski too and get a top flight kicker in the league? Hell, the future of the Saints running game as we all know is Mike Carney!! He\'s never played a down, but I just know he\'s the second coming of Riggins.

I don\'t believe for a second BMG wants to start O\'Sullivan. I do believe he wants Brooks gone, though. When BMG wants to be serious, he knows his football well.

He just likes to stir the pot a little bit. I believe his intention was not to seriously talk about O\'Sulivan. He just used O\'Sullivan as a \"bridge\" to bash Brooks.

I respond to his posts because I think he\'s funny.

Luckily for the Brooks bashers, he fumbled the ball some last year or they wouldn\'t have anything to bash him about. At all.

lumm0x · 05-15-2004, 11:51 AM

Believe me Billy, I\'m no Brooks fan, but he\'s better than our available alternatives or what we could realistically get as a replacement. He doesn\'t make my personal top 10 QB list (simply because of personal preferences in style), but he is a starting QB in this league and the best one we\'ve ever had.

I will always criticize any players weaknesses in conversation but still support them 100% come game day.

05-15-2004, 09:05 AM	#31
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	O'Sullivan, Our Hope for a Super Future BMG is the one that made it about Brooks in his initial post on this thread. He might have said FUTURE. But, tommorow is the future and he wants to get rid of Brooks yesterday. Yep. If we could dump Brooks, then it\'s win-win all around. We get either good picks from the Raiders or Woodson or both, so we address our defense. We get rid of a problem player that we pay too much and we get to start a guy who is destined to be a star in this league. I can\'t see any downside to this whole scenario.

05-15-2004, 09:49 AM	#32
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	O'Sullivan, Our Hope for a Super Future Yep. If we could dump Brooks, then it\'s win-win all around. We get either good picks from the Raiders or Woodson or both, so we address our defense. We get rid of a problem player that we pay too much and we get to start a guy who is destined to be a star in this league. I can\'t see any downside to this whole scenario. Why would you want to dump a talented, big contract player that you claim is a team cancer, for a talented, equally big contract player who is a team cancer? Both have made equally bone-headed comments, Woodson more visibly anti-team at the worst moments. Moreover, why would you want to reduce the talent of our team at a position of maximum impact to address a position with minimum impact? Maybe we could trade Deuce for Janikowski too and get a top flight kicker in the league? Hell, the future of the Saints running game as we all know is Mike Carney!! He\'s never played a down, but I just know he\'s the second coming of Riggins.

05-15-2004, 10:12 AM	#33
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616	O'Sullivan, Our Hope for a Super Future Why would you want to dump a talented, big contract player that you claim is a team cancer, for a talented, equally big contract player who is a team cancer? Both have made equally bone-headed comments, Woodson more visibly anti-team at the worst moments. Moreover, why would you want to reduce the talent of our team at a position of maximum impact to address a position with minimum impact? Maybe we could trade Deuce for Janikowski too and get a top flight kicker in the league? Hell, the future of the Saints running game as we all know is Mike Carney!! He\'s never played a down, but I just know he\'s the second coming of Riggins. I don\'t believe for a second BMG wants to start O\'Sullivan. I do believe he wants Brooks gone, though. When BMG wants to be serious, he knows his football well. He just likes to stir the pot a little bit. I believe his intention was not to seriously talk about O\'Sulivan. He just used O\'Sullivan as a \"bridge\" to bash Brooks. I respond to his posts because I think he\'s funny. Luckily for the Brooks bashers, he fumbled the ball some last year or they wouldn\'t have anything to bash him about. At all.
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616

05-15-2004, 11:51 AM	#34
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	O'Sullivan, Our Hope for a Super Future Believe me Billy, I\'m no Brooks fan, but he\'s better than our available alternatives or what we could realistically get as a replacement. He doesn\'t make my personal top 10 QB list (simply because of personal preferences in style), but he is a starting QB in this league and the best one we\'ve ever had. I will always criticize any players weaknesses in conversation but still support them 100% come game day.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey