What is More Likely: Mark Ingram scores at least 12 touchdowns or Malcolm Jenkins snags at least 8 interceptions?
 

So Who Dat Nation, what is more likely? Let's have some good, solid discussion on this one guys and gals.

What is More Likely: Mark Ingram vs. Malcolm Jenkins edition - Canal Street Chronicles

I'll take the under on both. But, my choice would be Ingram.

With all the offensive weapons the Saints have, I went with Jenkins.

Cruize I'm with you under and neither. But for "S & Giggles" I will have to say Ingram also

Definitely Jenkins, but would love to be proved wrong.

Ingram with 12 TD's

Malcolm Jenkins cant catch, atleast not yet, spags can teach him

Neither.

Would have been a better question at 10 and 6. At least that could actually happen for one of them.

Given the numbers proposed I would say Ingram... I don't think either player will hit those numbers but a RB getting 12 TD's is far more likely than a safety getting 8 INT's. Unless it's Darren Sharper in '09.

I'm not sold on Jenkins at FS at all, I'll take Ingram for 10 Alex!!

Ingram will get 12 TDs this season, I don't see that as much of a challenge. If he could have stayed healthy he could have amassed 800 yards rushing and 8 TDs, so in this upcoming year I expect 1000 yds and at least 10 TDs.

As for MJ, the new system should help the entire defense, if not due to the scheme then because its something that other teams can't plan for (2009 GW defense). I see 6 INTs from MJ this year.

In the end, who knows, I just hope for a Defense that can hold the lead.

-Off topic-
Hearing that is Shanle working with the first team worries me. As long as he starts we will have a weak spot on defense.