Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Payton, Loomis and Vitt refuse to speak to Peter King

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; 8. I think this is the cost of doing business the way I think it should be done in NFL journalism these days -- and I tell you this because it may affect my ability to know as much about ...

Like Tree36Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2012, 05:08 PM   #1
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Payton, Loomis and Vitt refuse to speak to Peter King

8. I think this is the cost of doing business the way I think it should be done in NFL journalism these days -- and I tell you this because it may affect my ability to know as much about the Saints as I've known in the past few years. Joe Vitt and Mickey Loomis, the New Orleans past and future 2012 brain trust, are not speaking to me, presumably because of my reporting on the Saints' bounty case.

Sean Payton told me earlier in the year he wouldn't speak to me either, because he didn't think I reported the story fairly. I'd had great relationships with Loomis and Payton. But that's how it goes. For the record, I regret nothing that I've written or said on the case.
Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Philip Rivers, others talk about NFL training camps, 2012 NFL season - Peter King - SI.com
Wow, good for them.

Now do the same with Prisco.
Danno is online now  
Old 07-30-2012, 05:17 PM   #2
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
Maybe someone can get the owner of the Creole Creamery to add King to the do not serve this man list!
Seer1 is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 05:22 PM   #3
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
The only things that Peter King has written about the Saints this offseason is what Roger Goodell has told him. He's done nothing to investigate the story or challenge the NFL's position in any way. Just my opinion but I think he's more concerned with his access to the commissioner's office and high ranking people in the NFL than he is with doing any actual reporting. Journalism is hard work, pandering is easy.
papz, Beastmode and SaintsBro like this.
Utah_Saint is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 06:18 PM   #4
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 2,484
Blog Entries: 2
Peter Whom?

Alaska
AlaskaSaints is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 06:23 PM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 1,219
Act like a man and grow a pair or you really mad because another man want talk to you
Luda34 is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 06:24 PM   #6
Donated Plasma
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 18,556
Blog Entries: 5
Originally Posted by Utah_Saint View Post
The only things that Peter King has written about the Saints this offseason is what Roger Goodell has told him. He's done nothing to investigate the story or challenge the NFL's position in any way. Just my opinion but I think he's more concerned with his access to the commissioner's office and high ranking people in the NFL than he is with doing any actual reporting. Journalism is hard work, pandering is easy.
Oh they all are. Not just King. I'm so disgusted with 'sports reporters' I can't even think about it. It makes my blood boil how the media kissed Roger's backside for fear of losing their access. That makes each one of them tons worse than anybody who took a dollar for this alleged bounty program.
Utah_Saint likes this.
saintfan is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 07:00 PM   #7
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
When Roger started this mess there was story after story about the ironclad case against the Saints. Some even stating the Saints got off lightly.

Fast forward a few months and the ironclad evidence turned into a bio degradable diaper six months in a landfill. Fast forward again to Vilma's suit and despite the Judge's concerns, it sounds like crickets out there.

I have not seen one major sports reporter bring this to light. When a judge says Roger sliced the salami thin and that she is troubled by their whole process those are serious statements. If King isn't going to take his craft serious then there is no reason anyone in the Saints organization should take him serious.
saintfan and Papa Voodoo like this.
Beastmode is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 07:10 PM   #8
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,530
Blog Entries: 3
"but that's how it goes.." ???

Peter King is even douchier than I thought!
Halo and SmashMouth like this.
saintsfan1976 is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 07:18 PM   #9
Site Donor MONTHLY
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 20,205
Blog Entries: 45
Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 View Post
"but that's how it goes.." ???

Peter King is even douchier than I thought!
I said in another thread, I won't even read Peter King or SI. Thanks for giving me highlights because I refuse to click the link.

And that goes way back before Bountygate was ever a glimmer in Goodell's eye.
Beastmode and SloMotion like this.
Halo is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 08:33 PM   #10
lightly scented
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 142
I don't think it will have any effect on your ability Peter. You never really known much about the saints.
nicebush25 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/46998-payton-loomis-vitt-refuse-speak-peter-king.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Payton, Loomis and Vitt refuse to speak to Peter King This thread Refback 07-30-2012 05:29 PM 41


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts