Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes

Danno · 03-20-2013, 03:05 PM

Originally Posted by AllSaints

I dont think it is as bad as yall are making it out to be.... geezzz

You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc...

I'm skeptical this is going to go over well.

I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation.

jeanpierre · 03-20-2013, 03:12 PM

Next play will be to get the players on record saying they hate the rule...

once that is accomplished, you have a chip when former players file their lawsuit - Joe Horn, all his kids, Over the Hill Footballers et al vs the NFL...

papz · 03-20-2013, 03:16 PM

Why do things need to be so complicated?

Papa Voodoo · 03-20-2013, 03:20 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

I think the helmet rule only applies to the runner, not the defender nailing him.

Good point. So a runner can still get brain trauma from a defender via a helmet to helmet hit and that's ok?

never mind, saw the answer....yes to both.

Papa Voodoo · 03-20-2013, 03:23 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc...

I'm skeptical this is going to go over well.

I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation.

The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

spkb25 · 03-20-2013, 03:40 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

OMG this is the dumbest thing I have ever heard in my entire life NFL related.

How can they enforce this?

Exactly Danno, flag fest- boring

Rugby Saint II · 03-20-2013, 03:40 PM

So much for gaining that extra yard and a first down. This means more punts and more rules so the returners don't get hurt. It's crap I tell you......more crap from Godhell.

Mardigras9 · 03-20-2013, 03:47 PM

Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo

The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

Well I guess we'll know who will be the most penalized team if this is the governing party.

lee909 · 03-20-2013, 03:47 PM

And yet the NFL still put out videos like

NFL Hard Hits: Brutal Revolution - YouTube

NFL Moments of impact full version! - YouTube

B_Dub_Saint · 03-20-2013, 07:31 PM

Can you imagine we are down by 4 with 15 seconds left on the clock and its 3rd and goal on the 3 yard line; we hand off to PT who lowers his head and drives a guy back for a touchdown right!

No 15 yard penalty and it's 4th down backed up 15 yards. If that happens and it cost us the game, then come back and tell me it's no big deal. Just sayin.

03-20-2013, 03:05 PM	#21
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by AllSaints I dont think it is as bad as yall are making it out to be.... geezzz You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc... I'm skeptical this is going to go over well. I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation. spkb25 likes this.

03-20-2013, 03:12 PM	#22
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Next play will be to get the players on record saying they hate the rule... once that is accomplished, you have a chip when former players file their lawsuit - Joe Horn, all his kids, Over the Hill Footballers et al vs the NFL...

03-20-2013, 03:16 PM	#23
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,681	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Why do things need to be so complicated?

03-20-2013, 03:20 PM	#24
Papa Voodoo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,628	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Danno I think the helmet rule only applies to the runner, not the defender nailing him. Good point. So a runner can still get brain trauma from a defender via a helmet to helmet hit and that's ok? never mind, saw the answer....yes to both.

03-20-2013, 03:23 PM	#25
Papa Voodoo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,628	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Danno You may be right, but based on what I've seen them do with the "defensless receiver" and the new catch rules concerning a "football move", and the "fumble/no fumble ball moving as it hits the ground but still in his hands" etc... I'm skeptical this is going to go over well. I'd love to see an example of what is, and what isn't, a violation. The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-20-2013, 03:40 PM	#26
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,057	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Danno OMG this is the dumbest thing I have ever heard in my entire life NFL related. How can they enforce this? Exactly Danno, flag fest- boring

03-20-2013, 03:40 PM	#27
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 23,718	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes So much for gaining that extra yard and a first down. This means more punts and more rules so the returners don't get hurt. It's crap I tell you......more crap from Godhell. spkb25 likes this.

03-20-2013, 03:47 PM	#28
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo The commissioner will arbitraily decide on violations and penalties based on popularity of the player/franchise like all of the other illegal hits. Well I guess we'll know who will be the most penalized team if this is the governing party.

03-20-2013, 07:31 PM	#30
B_Dub_Saint 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lafayette, LA Posts: 2,343 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes Can you imagine we are down by 4 with 15 seconds left on the clock and its 3rd and goal on the 3 yard line; we hand off to PT who lowers his head and drives a guy back for a touchdown right! No 15 yard penalty and it's 4th down backed up 15 yards. If that happens and it cost us the game, then come back and tell me it's no big deal. Just sayin. spkb25 likes this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/56410-tuck-rule-no-helmet-rule-yes.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Tuck rule no, Helmet rule yes	This thread	Refback	03-20-2013 12:05 PM	18