New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Lets see About AB (https://blackandgold.com/saints/6607-lets-see-about-ab.html)

DieV3rse 11-25-2004 11:19 AM

Lets see About AB
 


As I came upon some information as browsing site some news came upon me to have proven everyone who laughed at me about Ab not being in the top 10. I see that Ab as sportsline has thought so to proven by his stats is raked oh lets see TEN as proven.

Laugh at that :D


http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/player...gularseason/QB

saintswhodi 11-25-2004 11:39 AM

Lets see About AB
 
Isn\'t he also in the top 10 in boneheadded plays? And what\'s his record as compared to those who are in the top 10? Jake Delhomme is at 15 and has more tds with a WORSE team than the Saints(Just pulled him out cause of Carolina\'s record guys. Not to start a Jake verses AB debate.)

whodatsaintsfan26 11-25-2004 01:28 PM

Lets see About AB
 
See if you can find AB\'s stats in the first quarter. He puts up a lot of garbage stats after the game is already over. When you down 20 all the time you cant run. Look at his 400 yard game against Denver a couple years ago. The stats look great, but look at the results of the games. You can make stats look anyway you want them to look, all that matters are the W\'s and L\'s. That stat doesnt lie, and AB is a 500 qb. That is not a top 10 qb.

JOESAM2002 11-25-2004 01:47 PM

Lets see About AB
 
It\'s called padding stats.

Quote:

\"Statistics are for losers.\"
Vince Lombardi

whodatsaintsfan26 11-25-2004 02:05 PM

Lets see About AB
 
in the padding stats category AB is absolutely a top 10 QB in this league. When the game is on the line bottom 10 QB.

mutineer10 11-26-2004 01:04 AM

Lets see About AB
 
Since we\'re discussing the number 10, here\'s an interesting little tidbit some of you might find interesting...

I was browsing the \"Stats 2004\" link (to your left on this page), and I noticed that this year\'s Saints have scored a total of 10 points in the first quarter, all 10 against the lowly 49er\'s (in a game we barely won). Maybe \"statistics are for losers,\" but I can\'t help but feel that stat may help explain why WE are such losers.

10 points in the first quarter through Week 10 of the season. Does that sound like the work of a top 10 quarterback to you guys?

:P

LordOfEntropy 11-26-2004 07:36 AM

Lets see About AB
 
Nope.

Danno 11-26-2004 08:10 AM

Lets see About AB
 
We have a defense on pace to finish within 16 yards of the worst defense in the ENTIRE HISTORY of the NFL and people still want to point to Brooks.

BrooksMustGo 11-26-2004 08:49 AM

Lets see About AB
 
Quote:

It\'s called padding stats.
Too right Joe.

But I saw this breakdown of his passing and thought it might be fun to dispel an Aaron Brook myth.

Myth--It isn\'t Brooks fault, its all the drops.
In the 2004 season, Brooks has made 368 attempts with 156 incompletions. There have been 17 drops making about 11% of all incompletions being drops. Now 11% of all incompletions sounds like a lot, like maybe enough to determine whether we win or lose a game. But then if you consider that 63 passes have just been poor throws, then you come up with about 40% of all incompletions.

To put it in perspective. 4.6% of all passes are dropped.
17.1% of all passes are just bad throws.

http://snap.stats.com/stats/nflinfo/...ts.asp?id=4781



Danno 11-26-2004 08:55 AM

Lets see About AB
 
Quote:

It\'s called padding stats.
It could just as easily be said that Joe Horn is a big beneficiary of that stat padding also. Funny, no one ever brings that up.

[Edited on 26/11/2004 by Danno]

spkb25 11-26-2004 09:06 AM

Lets see About AB
 
A.B has made some bone head moves recently but im sorry there are 22 guys on the field and a qb is just one of them. wins and losses are not how you judge a qb. because if it is then archie manning really sucked too. i think it would have to be said for every qb in our history only one has won a playoff game. im sorry wins and losses doesnt decide it for me. if he had talent around him or good coaching or whatever you chalk up to why we suck was improved, then i would say it was about wins and losses. but not when the rest of the team sucks. dont write about the two or three guys we have that are good, because that is exactly my argument there isnt enough of them


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com