Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Before you go Jim....

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; We won the playoff game cause Az Hakim can\'t field a punt, I am stunned anyone still believes this....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2004, 06:35 AM   #11
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort Alabama
Posts: 14,571
Before you go Jim....

We won the playoff game cause Az Hakim can\'t field a punt,
I am stunned anyone still believes this.
Danno is online now  
Latest Blogs
Is this Manning's last Hurrah? Last Blog: 04-16-2014 By: SmashMouth


Landry over Beckham Jr. Last Blog: 04-12-2014 By: joker-saint


Saints Free Agency 2014 Last Blog: 03-11-2014 By: SmashMouth


Old 12-02-2004, 08:21 AM   #12
Chuck Liddells Right Hand
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Prairieville, Louisiana
Posts: 1,227
Before you go Jim....

We won the playoff game cause Az Hakim can\'t field a punt,
Actually, we won because it just so happens that hell had frozen over that day. El nino or something..... :iamwst:
dberce1 is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 10:08 AM   #13
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Before you go Jim....

Actually, we won because it just so happens that hell had frozen over that day. El nino or something
I agree with that.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 12:08 PM   #14
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,679
Before you go Jim....

i think my logic was quite clear as the rest of the posts clearly showed my point that has didnt win with ditkas guys. but even if he had, then that would make him a better coach then ditka because he would have won with the same talent. thing is he didnt win with ditkas guys. that is a huge lie. in all honesty there is one person on here that is constantly making that point over and over again. and he is consistenly shown that he is wrong. but yet he stills makes the point as if it has some validity or if he keeps making it over and over and over then eventually people will stop telling him he is wrong and the lie will be then excepted as truth. its like many lies in our society that people just except as truth for some reason. like pepsi one gives you cancer. or sweet and low does. or that a dogs mouth is cleaner then a humans. whihc is 100% false. do i even have to say explaine why.
but go on keep stating that fact over and over again until we stop telling you that your wrong. this way you can make your untruth the truth.

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Lombardi
spkb25 is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 05:11 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 218
Before you go Jim....

i think my logic was quite clear as the rest of the posts clearly showed my point that has didnt win with ditkas guys. but even if he had, then that would make him a better coach then ditka because he would have won with the same talent. thing is he didnt win with ditkas guys. that is a huge lie. in all honesty there is one person on here that is constantly making that point over and over again. and he is consistenly shown that he is wrong. but yet he stills makes the point as if it has some validity or if he keeps making it over and over and over then eventually people will stop telling him he is wrong and the lie will be then excepted as truth. its like many lies in our society that people just except as truth for some reason. like pepsi one gives you cancer. or sweet and low does. or that a dogs mouth is cleaner then a humans. whihc is 100% false. do i even have to say explaine why.
but go on keep stating that fact over and over again until we stop telling you that your wrong. this way you can make your untruth the truth.
Your problem is ..You seem to think that I care what you have to say...Or..You think all my posts are directly aimed at pi**ing you off..

And the very simple fact is..I could not possibly care less whether or not you agree with anything I have said or ever will...

I don\'t have some secret agenda..I just come here to talk football..that\'s all..I don\'t try to\'\'UP MY pOST COUNT BY POSTING MEANINGLESS WORDS\'\'..like you have said I do..

I have no idea where you are coming form..and I don\'t care..

F.Y.I... A dog\'s mouth was never stated to be cleaner by anyone..haha..have you ever read a book/..A dog\'s mouth has certain indiginous microfloura that we do not..and vice versa...

I can\'t remember saying Pepsi causes cancer...nor..Do I recall anyone saying so..on any post...

So..Instead of going on a self righteous witch hunt..Educate yourself...

And don\'t be suprised when I continue saying the off the wall things I do..it\'s just how I operate..If you think I am purposley spreading lies to reach some sort of hidden agenda...more power to you..



[Edited on 2/12/2004 by shadowdrinker_x]

[Edited on 2/12/2004 by shadowdrinker_x]
shadowdrinker_x is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 08:40 PM   #16
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,679
Before you go Jim....

first off i wanst pointing you out. i had no idea you had said that about ditka before this time. i was only stating that someone on here ( who i couldnt remember ) kept making that claim. i was not at all pointing you out. because to me thats the first time i heard you say it. but if you are the one that kept making the claim then i have said before it wasnt true. but i have no axe to grind with you.
as far as dogs mouths and the other things i said on here you absolutely missed the point. it wasnt in regards to anyones post on here. more a statement of how many people pass untruths as truths. not that anyone on here has made those claims.
now getting back to the dogs mouths cleaner then humans i dare you to show me any such study done at any time to prove that. i searched high and low to find one. the only thing that i found was that most scientist knew nothing of any such study ever performed and if they were asked to give their opinion on it they would say that it was incorrect. why you might ask. because if the dirtiest part of any human beings body (or the one with the most bacteria) it would be their mouths. so if thats true for humans that would certainly be true for dogs. then you would ask as the scientist did what do dogs use their mouths for. i have two of them and i can tell you they clean their bodies and that includes their arse as well as their privates. i would be sure to admit that their mouths have different agents used to clean them then humans do. but they would almost have to with what they use their mouths for. that being said they are in no way cleaner then a humans and every statement i could find from a scientist said in their opinion they would almost certainly be dirtier.

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Lombardi
spkb25 is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 09:38 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 218
Before you go Jim....

first off i wanst pointing you out. i had no idea you had said that about ditka before this time. i was only stating that someone on here ( who i couldnt remember ) kept making that claim. i was not at all pointing you out. because to me thats the first time i heard you say it. but if you are the one that kept making the claim then i have said before it wasnt true. but i have no axe to grind with you.
as far as dogs mouths and the other things i said on here you absolutely missed the point. it wasnt in regards to anyones post on here. more a statement of how many people pass untruths as truths. not that anyone on here has made those claims.
now getting back to the dogs mouths cleaner then humans i dare you to show me any such study done at any time to prove that. i searched high and low to find one. the only thing that i found was that most scientist knew nothing of any such study ever performed and if they were asked to give their opinion on it they would say that it was incorrect. why you might ask. because if the dirtiest part of any human beings body (or the one with the most bacteria) it would be their mouths. so if thats true for humans that would certainly be true for dogs. then you would ask as the scientist did what do dogs use their mouths for. i have two of them and i can tell you they clean their bodies and that includes their arse as well as their privates. i would be sure to admit that their mouths have different agents used to clean them then humans do. but they would almost have to with what they use their mouths for. that being said they are in no way cleaner then a humans and every statement i could find from a scientist said in their opinion they would almost certainly be dirtier.
Wow..hahaha..ok..I am a nursing Instructor..I have done so for the last 3 years...Why do I know about the amount and type of Indiginous microfloura in a dog\'s mouth?

One of the top reasons people go to the emergency room is dog bites, it\'s my job to know what sort of antibiotics to use to fight gram positive and gram negative..also...to teach the difference of bacteriostatic vs bacteriocidal remedies...to effectivley eliminate infections

In the field I am in..It\'s not the matter of simply clean mouths..it\'s the factors of what sort of Bacteria lives and breeds within the openings of human bodies..Dog\'s have a far less number of said microfloura..making thier mouths ..in effect..cleaner..

Chew on that a while..with your nasty mouth..haha

[Edited on 3/12/2004 by shadowdrinker_x]
shadowdrinker_x is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 10:17 PM   #18
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 1,360
Before you go Jim....

Pardon my inquisitve nature, but how on a football forum did we begin talking about canine indiginous microfloura? I hear its going around these days.
subguy is offline  
Old 12-02-2004, 11:55 PM   #19
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 1,737
Before you go Jim....

I can\'t remember saying Pepsi causes cancer...nor..Do I recall anyone saying so..on any post...
Don\'t kid yourself. Everything causes cancer except Sam Adams beer and Winston cigarettes. That\'s why they\'re all I consume.

And my dog doesn\'t curse nearly as often as I do ... just when I\'m drunk ... so I must regard her mouth as cleaner than mine.
mutineer10 is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 07:53 AM   #20
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,679
Before you go Jim....

bro im glad that your a nurse. and no their mouths are not cleaner then humans and once again prove that to me with any study you can find. you being a nurse in no way makes you a scientist. my sister is a nurse and my wife is studying to be one. ill ask my sister how she fels about that. but for now this is the last post i will make on the subject. i think that we can agree to disagree. but i will give you the fact that you have more education then i do on the matter because i dont have any medical schooling what so ever. but like i said to you earlier i searched high and low for any such study and i could find none. all i could find is that there would be almost no way for a dogs mouth to be cleaner then a humans. i may if i have time post some findings for you in the other chat forum but not in here. ill let you know if i do. it just depends on time. im buisy right now with the end of the semester. but for now no more post from me in here on the subject

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Lombardi
spkb25 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts