New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions

10-14-2014, 09:23 AM

You don't want to see them unless we're completely out of the division race.

blackangold · 10-14-2014, 09:54 AM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

As Gordon Ramsey would say, THEIR RAW!!! lol

You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok....

JG was raw too, but for years people here said he was our best pass rusher sitting on the bench...

Sometimes raw is cooked enough. (I like Sushi)

Mardigras9 · 10-14-2014, 09:57 AM

No surprise. This team hasn't shown any evidence that it will show up in Detroit and take care of business this year.
As far as reggie, it will be hard to watch if he "goes off" against the Saints.

dizzle88 · 10-14-2014, 10:01 AM

Originally Posted by blackangold

You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok....

JG was raw too, but for years people here said he was our best pass rusher sitting on the bench...

Sometimes raw is cooked enough. (I like Sushi)

I said no such thing, I quoted Gordon Ramsay saying their raw, I didn't say #91 was more of a finished product, the coaching staff are saying that by putting him in the rotation.

NonieT · 10-14-2014, 10:33 AM

Originally Posted by billyt81

Glad someone else mentioned Reggie because I'm real worried about him going off on Sunday. About Reggie: I'll always be dissappointed that we never let Reggie get 20+ carries per game and prove if he's an every down back or not. I think in his prime with us he could've been our Marshall Faulk. Sure hope Ingram is back. We need him vs Detroits front 7.

Reggie had an opportunity to prove he was an every down back when we played Seattle in 2010. He was the only decent running back we had left on the roster that season. He couldn't get it done. That's the reason we drafted Mark Ingram. He would have had a great chance to get 20 carries in that game but as I've already said, he could not get it done.

Danno · 10-14-2014, 10:36 AM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

I said no such thing, I quoted Gordon Ramsay saying their raw, I didn't say #91 was more of a finished product, the coaching staff are saying that by putting him in the rotation.

It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks.

blackangold · 10-14-2014, 10:59 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks.

Considering they haven't done anything to prove it, I am surprised.

#91 wasn't really impressive even in the preseason yet everyone talked about him because of the story.

Dixon was good in the preseason but has really struggled during his few snaps during the regular season.

I wonder if there is some internal struggle going on between Loomis and the coaching staff... interesting.

|Mitch| · 10-14-2014, 11:05 AM

Originally Posted by blackangold

You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok....

Not to be rude, but how would you know? Have you been going to practices and in meetings or is that just an unproven opinion?

SmashMouth · 10-14-2014, 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks.

If you're Pierre Thomas, is it strange that you beat out a #4 draft pick at RB?

Danno · 10-14-2014, 11:17 AM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

If you're Pierre Thomas, is it strange that you beat out a #4 draft pick at RB?

Not at all, it was obvious he was much better than Pittman from day 1 of training camp. It wasn't even close, Pittman was a bust.

But are SJB and Powell busts?

I'm not surprised 2 UDFA's are getting playing time, I'm surprised and disappointed that two draft picks at areas of obvious needs aren't.

10-14-2014, 09:23 AM	#31
Threaded by saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,536 Blog Entries: 3 Rating: (0 votes - average) You don't want to see them unless we're completely out of the division race.
Views: 9697

10-14-2014, 09:54 AM	#32
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by dizzle88 As Gordon Ramsey would say, THEIR RAW!!! lol You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok.... JG was raw too, but for years people here said he was our best pass rusher sitting on the bench... Sometimes raw is cooked enough. (I like Sushi)

10-14-2014, 09:57 AM	#33
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions No surprise. This team hasn't shown any evidence that it will show up in Detroit and take care of business this year. As far as reggie, it will be hard to watch if he "goes off" against the Saints.

10-14-2014, 10:01 AM	#34
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 10,838	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by blackangold You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok.... JG was raw too, but for years people here said he was our best pass rusher sitting on the bench... Sometimes raw is cooked enough. (I like Sushi) I said no such thing, I quoted Gordon Ramsay saying their raw, I didn't say #91 was more of a finished product, the coaching staff are saying that by putting him in the rotation.

10-14-2014, 10:33 AM	#35
NonieT 500th Post Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 921	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by billyt81 Glad someone else mentioned Reggie because I'm real worried about him going off on Sunday. About Reggie: I'll always be dissappointed that we never let Reggie get 20+ carries per game and prove if he's an every down back or not. I think in his prime with us he could've been our Marshall Faulk. Sure hope Ingram is back. We need him vs Detroits front 7. Reggie had an opportunity to prove he was an every down back when we played Seattle in 2010. He was the only decent running back we had left on the roster that season. He couldn't get it done. That's the reason we drafted Mark Ingram. He would have had a great chance to get 20 carries in that game but as I've already said, he could not get it done.
NonieT 500th Post Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 921

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-14-2014, 10:36 AM	#36
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by dizzle88 I said no such thing, I quoted Gordon Ramsay saying their raw, I didn't say #91 was more of a finished product, the coaching staff are saying that by putting him in the rotation. It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks.

10-14-2014, 10:59 AM	#37
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by Danno It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks. Considering they haven't done anything to prove it, I am surprised. #91 wasn't really impressive even in the preseason yet everyone talked about him because of the story. Dixon was good in the preseason but has really struggled during his few snaps during the regular season. I wonder if there is some internal struggle going on between Loomis and the coaching staff... interesting.

10-14-2014, 11:05 AM	#38
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by blackangold You think #91 is more of a finished product than Powell.... ok.... Not to be rude, but how would you know? Have you been going to practices and in meetings or is that just an unproven opinion? dizzle88 likes this.

10-14-2014, 11:10 AM	#39
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 36,987 Blog Entries: 29	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by Danno It is strange that 2 UDFA's that were a bit of a surprise to even make the team are starting ahead of our #2 and #5 draft picks. If you're Pierre Thomas, is it strange that you beat out a #4 draft pick at RB?

10-14-2014, 11:17 AM	#40
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	Re: New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions Originally Posted by SmashMouth If you're Pierre Thomas, is it strange that you beat out a #4 draft pick at RB? Not at all, it was obvious he was much better than Pittman from day 1 of training camp. It wasn't even close, Pittman was a bust. But are SJB and Powell busts? I'm not surprised 2 UDFA's are getting playing time, I'm surprised and disappointed that two draft picks at areas of obvious needs aren't. hagan714 likes this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/68791-new-orleans-saints-open-underdog-against-detroit-lions.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
New Orleans Saints open as underdog against Detroit Lions	This thread	Refback	10-13-2014 10:32 AM	3