bet! and i hate the cowgirls but i'm a football fan and i know if they continue to do what they're doing offensively their going to the sb. also if you noticed i didnt mention anything about their defense.

ai keep bringing up the pats game, do anyone remember that one.

running the ball (effectively) will take pressure off drew and our offense will start clicking but many of you are satisfied with 108, or as mitch stated 178 which was wk one is good enough.

the only thing i said and have been saying since week 1 is that, "our success this season rely on our running game". i never mentioned how well drew needs to play, i didnt mention anything about how well our defense needs to play, how well coach sp and other need to coach, nothing. i maybe wrong when it comes to stats and that's only because i'm not a stats guy. i believe in the "eye test method". nothing i said have been bogus. i may have been early in my detection whereas no one seen it or acknowledged it at that time, i.e. our offense is "equally the blame for our woes", when everyone was totally downing our defense. i also put up a formula by stating, "more offense + less defense = wins". so where did i say a lot of things but was wrong? all i see now is articles stating what i said earlier, in regards to our offense. i remember saying our offense is stagnant in clutch parts of the game, everyone on here said i was crazy and started putting up stats. now everyone is saying drew needs to do this, we need to do that, blah blah blah. again people just give me credit (a little) for my foresight. i told you all, i study the saints, i just dont watch them. meaning i dont need stats to say who's good or bad. i'm looking at them play. i saw weakeness last season in our offense and its just carrying over to this season.

and maybe you're right i shouldnt start off by saying "i told you so", but where have i been wrong. so me saying dallas is successfull due to their running game is false? who would really argue with that fact? when i said our offense needs to create drives that there were parts in the game where we could have won on offense, how is that false. i even pointed out some instances. drew been throwing int's he did it last year. our offense showed signes of not being able to pick up first downs when we need them they did that last year.i keep bringing up the pats game, do anyone remember that one. the only reason why i mentioned that scenerio is because i was betting on them and i didnt put my money on the saints that week because of an uneasy feeling i had and my partner called me saying how i should have and right before he could finish he gloat we lost. lol so everyone please forgive me, dont want to come off as i told you so type of person but my tune hasnt changed. running the ball (effectively) will take pressure off drew and our offense will start clicking but many of you are satisfied with 108, or as mitch stated 178 which was wk one is good enough.

see now you being silly. of course there's other elements that keeps the jets and chiefs out of the mix, like ummmm turnovers, but can you really, really argue the fact that dallas are successful because of their EFFECTIVE running game. its not t nomo like its been in the past throwing 30-40 times a game like our qb is doing (go ahead danno bring me the stat on that). its because when you can hand the ball off to a rb on 3 and 8 and he gets 10 or 11 yrds! c'mon man what can anyone's defense do with that?.... nothing.

Drew Brees and the Art of the Untimely Interception