Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Argument against this?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I knew taking Les Kelley was a mistake back in 1967. Typical Tom Fears move! Alan Page couldn't miss! Those were the good times. Lose every game but at least the other team felt it!!! Super Bowl? we didn't need ...

Like Tree33Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2015, 11:15 AM   #61
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,671
Re: Argument against this?

I knew taking Les Kelley was a mistake back in 1967. Typical Tom Fears move! Alan Page couldn't miss! Those were the good times. Lose every game but at least the other team felt it!!! Super Bowl? we didn't need no stinking Super Bowl!!
vpheughan is offline  
Old 04-14-2015, 11:35 AM   #62
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Watford England
Posts: 6,115
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Argument against this?

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 View Post
Gallette had his salary turned into a signing bonus before the cap deadline

"By converting that bonus into a signing bonus, the Saints can now spread the salary cap hit that comes with it over a five-year period.

This restructured contract saves the Saints $10 million when it comes to the NFL's salary cap."

Junior Galette restructures contract with Saints | New Orleans - WDSU Home


now is the time to trade him
With a dead hit of 10ml now isnt the time to trade
lee909 is offline  
Old 04-14-2015, 11:35 AM   #63
100th Post
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 180
Re: Argument against this?

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 View Post
Gallette had his salary turned into a signing bonus before the cap deadline

"By converting that bonus into a signing bonus, the Saints can now spread the salary cap hit that comes with it over a five-year period.

This restructured contract saves the Saints $10 million when it comes to the NFL's salary cap."

Junior Galette restructures contract with Saints | New Orleans - WDSU Home


now is the time to trade him
It's still 4 years 41 million. they just spread it out to save cap space.
TwistedTiger is offline  
Old 04-14-2015, 04:47 PM   #64
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,255
Re: Argument against this?

Originally Posted by RaginCajun83 View Post
Gallette had his salary turned into a signing bonus before the cap deadline

"By converting that bonus into a signing bonus, the Saints can now spread the salary cap hit that comes with it over a five-year period.

This restructured contract saves the Saints $10 million when it comes to the NFL's salary cap."

Junior Galette restructures contract with Saints | New Orleans - WDSU Home


now is the time to trade him
16.2 million in dead money... JR isn't going anywhere.
blackangold is offline  
Old 04-14-2015, 04:52 PM   #65
Hou Saints Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 4,733
Re: Argument against this?

I wouldn't put anything past Loomis now, if Payton wants Gallette gone then Loomis will find a way to make it happen
RaginCajun83 is offline  
Old 04-14-2015, 05:21 PM   #66
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,109
Re: Argument against this?

We're going with a Peter Griffin mentality in round 1. I can feel it. No way we sit on two #1's. We're going to do something unconventional. I do however believe it will work out. We get somebody that makes an immediate impact.
Beastmode is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://blackandgold.com/saints/71938-argument-against.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 04-12-2015 02:40 PM 6
Argument against this? This thread Refback 04-12-2015 02:18 PM 11


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2014 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts