New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com (http://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (http://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Let's start a poll for the fun of it (http://blackandgold.com/saints/7281-lets-start-poll-fun.html)

LongTimeFan 01-31-2005 05:44 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
Ok, as I said many times, I beleive that there are a few qb's who might be better than Brooks just none available right now so I don't see the point of cutting the ONLY qb we have that would be a very bad move, don't you think, I aksed this question but I had no answers as of yet, here goes again, what qb, hold up, let me ask it this way, if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB's, which available qb would you go after tomorrow?, not talking about the draft, I'm talking free agent, important though, the qb that you would go after has to be available, Bobby Hebert doesn't count.
don't take my post here the wrong way, I just want to know.
Now on the poll, please vote yes or no keeping AB's in N.O

I vote yes..my reason or above,

This poll might be interesting


ScottyRo 01-31-2005 05:51 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
Quote:

if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB\'s, which available qb would you go after tomorrow?
Someone posted a link to this years anticipated FAs. Could you repost it, please?

ANSWER: No, if a viable replacement can be found.

[Edited on 31/1/2005 by ScottyRo]

Saint_LB 01-31-2005 05:55 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
I vote no...and would not be disappointed if we went after whichever QB San Diego decides not to keep. I could live with either one. One thing you could be certain of, however, is that if after five years he has not proven himself to be a winner and proves to have \"Hoof in Mouth\" disease, I will be on his case every bit as much as Brooks.

FireVenturi 01-31-2005 06:12 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
YES

LongTimeFan 01-31-2005 06:24 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
Word has it that the Chargers will do everything that they can to keep both, so we have to put them on hold for now.

saintswhodi 01-31-2005 06:30 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith.

FireVenturi 01-31-2005 07:41 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
Quote:

No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith.
Volek...not bad
McMahon...maybe
Kitna..no
Gerrard...ur kidding right

Rodgers orSmith...YES

LongTimeFan 01-31-2005 08:00 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
Kitna would make a good backup though, wonder what it would take to get a Jon Kitna in N.O, to much I suppose

LKelley67 01-31-2005 08:56 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
No. i think maddox, kitna, or rattay are not prohibitively priced players who could be attained and successfully lead. the added positives are the increased millions in cap space and whatever draft pick(s) attained. hasslebeck or brees could be had but require a sizable commitment. brees takes trade payment too. i\'ll go for rattay and #33 pick from niners. mccarthy gets his boy to lead them to glory and have rodgers learn from the master aaron.

Saint78 01-31-2005 10:25 PM

Let's start a poll for the fun of it
 
YES! The pasture always looks greener on the other side then when you jump over the fence it is a sewer! Just remember the QB\'s we had before AB! Wait 2 years then draft JeMarcus Russell, trust me you will agree with me when he is through with college he is only gonna get better.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com