Let's start a poll for the fun of it

LongTimeFan · 01-31-2005, 05:44 PM

Ok, as I said many times, I beleive that there are a few qb's who might be better than Brooks just none available right now so I don't see the point of cutting the ONLY qb we have that would be a very bad move, don't you think, I aksed this question but I had no answers as of yet, here goes again, what qb, hold up, let me ask it this way, if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB's, which available qb would you go after tomorrow?, not talking about the draft, I'm talking free agent, important though, the qb that you would go after has to be available, Bobby Hebert doesn't count.
don't take my post here the wrong way, I just want to know.
Now on the poll, please vote yes or no keeping AB's in N.O

I vote yes..my reason or above,

This poll might be interesting

ScottyRo · 01-31-2005, 05:51 PM

if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB\'s, which available qb would you go after tomorrow?

Someone posted a link to this years anticipated FAs. Could you repost it, please?

ANSWER: No, if a viable replacement can be found.

[Edited on 31/1/2005 by ScottyRo]

Saint_LB · 01-31-2005, 05:55 PM

I vote no...and would not be disappointed if we went after whichever QB San Diego decides not to keep. I could live with either one. One thing you could be certain of, however, is that if after five years he has not proven himself to be a winner and proves to have \"Hoof in Mouth\" disease, I will be on his case every bit as much as Brooks.

FireVenturi · 01-31-2005, 06:12 PM

YES

LongTimeFan · 01-31-2005, 06:24 PM

Word has it that the Chargers will do everything that they can to keep both, so we have to put them on hold for now.

saintswhodi · 01-31-2005, 06:30 PM

No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith.

FireVenturi · 01-31-2005, 07:41 PM

No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith.

Volek...not bad
McMahon...maybe
Kitna..no
Gerrard...ur kidding right

Rodgers orSmith...YES

LongTimeFan · 01-31-2005, 08:00 PM

Kitna would make a good backup though, wonder what it would take to get a Jon Kitna in N.O, to much I suppose

LKelley67 · 01-31-2005, 08:56 PM

No. i think maddox, kitna, or rattay are not prohibitively priced players who could be attained and successfully lead. the added positives are the increased millions in cap space and whatever draft pick(s) attained. hasslebeck or brees could be had but require a sizable commitment. brees takes trade payment too. i\'ll go for rattay and #33 pick from niners. mccarthy gets his boy to lead them to glory and have rodgers learn from the master aaron.

Saint78 · 01-31-2005, 10:25 PM

YES! The pasture always looks greener on the other side then when you jump over the fence it is a sewer! Just remember the QB\'s we had before AB! Wait 2 years then draft JeMarcus Russell, trust me you will agree with me when he is through with college he is only gonna get better.

01-31-2005, 05:44 PM	#1
LongTimeFan Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Louisiana Posts: 2,403	Let's start a poll for the fun of it Ok, as I said many times, I beleive that there are a few qb's who might be better than Brooks just none available right now so I don't see the point of cutting the ONLY qb we have that would be a very bad move, don't you think, I aksed this question but I had no answers as of yet, here goes again, what qb, hold up, let me ask it this way, if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB's, which available qb would you go after tomorrow?, not talking about the draft, I'm talking free agent, important though, the qb that you would go after has to be available, Bobby Hebert doesn't count. don't take my post here the wrong way, I just want to know. Now on the poll, please vote yes or no keeping AB's in N.O I vote yes..my reason or above, This poll might be interesting

01-31-2005, 05:51 PM	#2
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	Let's start a poll for the fun of it if you were the owner of the New Orleans Saints and wanted a better qb than AB\'s, which available qb would you go after tomorrow? Someone posted a link to this years anticipated FAs. Could you repost it, please? ANSWER: No, if a viable replacement can be found. [Edited on 31/1/2005 by ScottyRo]

01-31-2005, 05:55 PM	#3
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894	Let's start a poll for the fun of it I vote no...and would not be disappointed if we went after whichever QB San Diego decides not to keep. I could live with either one. One thing you could be certain of, however, is that if after five years he has not proven himself to be a winner and proves to have \"Hoof in Mouth\" disease, I will be on his case every bit as much as Brooks.
Saint_LB Deuce Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,894

01-31-2005, 06:12 PM	#4
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Let's start a poll for the fun of it YES

01-31-2005, 06:24 PM	#5
LongTimeFan Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Louisiana Posts: 2,403	Let's start a poll for the fun of it Word has it that the Chargers will do everything that they can to keep both, so we have to put them on hold for now.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-31-2005, 06:30 PM	#6
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Let's start a poll for the fun of it No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith.

01-31-2005, 07:41 PM	#7
FireVenturi Cold as Ice! Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Da Big Easy Posts: 2,978	Let's start a poll for the fun of it No. Trade AB and use a pick to get Garrard, McMahon, or Kitna, or Volek if the pick is not high enough to get Rodgers or Smith. Volek...not bad McMahon...maybe Kitna..no Gerrard...ur kidding right Rodgers orSmith...YES

01-31-2005, 08:00 PM	#8
LongTimeFan Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Louisiana Posts: 2,403	Let's start a poll for the fun of it Kitna would make a good backup though, wonder what it would take to get a Jon Kitna in N.O, to much I suppose

01-31-2005, 08:56 PM	#9
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	Let's start a poll for the fun of it No. i think maddox, kitna, or rattay are not prohibitively priced players who could be attained and successfully lead. the added positives are the increased millions in cap space and whatever draft pick(s) attained. hasslebeck or brees could be had but require a sizable commitment. brees takes trade payment too. i\'ll go for rattay and #33 pick from niners. mccarthy gets his boy to lead them to glory and have rodgers learn from the master aaron.

01-31-2005, 10:25 PM	#10
Saint78 Registered Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 62	Let's start a poll for the fun of it YES! The pasture always looks greener on the other side then when you jump over the fence it is a sewer! Just remember the QB\'s we had before AB! Wait 2 years then draft JeMarcus Russell, trust me you will agree with me when he is through with college he is only gonna get better.
Saint78 Registered Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 62