Saints sign yet another QB!

baronm · 02-08-2005, 01:53 PM

Folks like to point to a few QBs that have come out of nowhere to enjoy some success. But for every ONE that has done well, there are FIVE (or more) who have flopped!!

true very true...

I do wonder how good/or bad henson is..that is the biggest question mark on the cowboys.

turbo_dog · 02-08-2005, 02:48 PM

or they feel like the guys that late might not have the potential to improve. I think their are 3 decent qbs in the draft the rest look like career backups.

I don\'t know about this. I think there are at least five or six quarterbacks in this draft who will eventually start in the NFL. Are you saying only the top three are \"decent\" and the others are no good, or do you have three particular players in mind? From the list of prospects I can say that I think the following will eventually be given a starting job somewhere, though I\'m not saying they will be Hall of Fame qbs.

1. Alex Smith
2. Aaron Rodgers
3. Charlie Frye
4. Jason Campbell
5. Adrian Mcpherson
6. Stefon Lefors

I personally like Smith, Frye, and Lefors the best out of these, but it is all a guessing game. Its not like I have access to their game films or medical records.
I didn\'t even mention Kyle Orton or Andrew Walters, who some say are two of the best five in the draft.

baronm · 02-08-2005, 04:57 PM

i\'m thinking smith, frye and cambell will be starters in the pros.

I think cambell is a marginal quarterback..the qb for harvard might be ok.

Danno · 02-08-2005, 05:06 PM

This article says he\'s third. Fox\'s website posted an article about Klingsbury challenging for the number 2 spot and possibly becoming a starter one day. Who doesn\'t have their sh-t straight?

Maybe they\'re assuming Bouman is already gone. Or pehaps someone else who I refuse to mention anymore is as good as gone...
Hmmmm.
Does any of this really even matter? Its February 8th.
Every single one of us knows our 2005 QB\'s will be,
1. Same as 2004
2. Same as 2004
3. Inactive

02-08-2005, 01:53 PM	#11
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	Saints sign yet another QB! Folks like to point to a few QBs that have come out of nowhere to enjoy some success. But for every ONE that has done well, there are FIVE (or more) who have flopped!! true very true... I do wonder how good/or bad henson is..that is the biggest question mark on the cowboys.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954

02-08-2005, 02:48 PM	#12
turbo_dog 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,540	Saints sign yet another QB! or they feel like the guys that late might not have the potential to improve. I think their are 3 decent qbs in the draft the rest look like career backups. I don\'t know about this. I think there are at least five or six quarterbacks in this draft who will eventually start in the NFL. Are you saying only the top three are \"decent\" and the others are no good, or do you have three particular players in mind? From the list of prospects I can say that I think the following will eventually be given a starting job somewhere, though I\'m not saying they will be Hall of Fame qbs. 1. Alex Smith 2. Aaron Rodgers 3. Charlie Frye 4. Jason Campbell 5. Adrian Mcpherson 6. Stefon Lefors I personally like Smith, Frye, and Lefors the best out of these, but it is all a guessing game. Its not like I have access to their game films or medical records. I didn\'t even mention Kyle Orton or Andrew Walters, who some say are two of the best five in the draft.

02-08-2005, 04:57 PM	#13
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	Saints sign yet another QB! i\'m thinking smith, frye and cambell will be starters in the pros. I think cambell is a marginal quarterback..the qb for harvard might be ok.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954

02-08-2005, 05:06 PM	#14
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,640	Saints sign yet another QB! This article says he\'s third. Fox\'s website posted an article about Klingsbury challenging for the number 2 spot and possibly becoming a starter one day. Who doesn\'t have their sh-t straight? Maybe they\'re assuming Bouman is already gone. Or pehaps someone else who I refuse to mention anymore is as good as gone... Hmmmm. Does any of this really even matter? Its February 8th. Every single one of us knows our 2005 QB\'s will be, 1. Same as 2004 2. Same as 2004 3. Inactive

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey