wonderlic
 

Overall i do not think it is a true indicator of success, it is a tool to measure players...much like the 40 etc. Anyway while bored i found the pasts test of some QB's. I think you will be shocked


Culpepper-18
Brooks-17
McNabb-15
Dan Marino-14

I will try to post the link as some of you and with good reason will think this is :icon_bs:

Give me someone who can play football!

[Edited on 11/2/2005 by FireVenturi]

wonderlic
 

www.macmirabile.com/Wonderlic/Wonderlic.htm


have fun

[Edited on 12/2/2005 by JOESAM2002]

wonderlic
 

When you post the link, highlight it and click the button that has a picture of a globe.

wonderlic
 

http://www.macmirabile.com/Wonderlic/Wonderlic.htm


Couldn\'t get the other one to work, so here it is again, just in case others are having the same problem.

Some others you might find interesting...

Steve Young........33
Troy Aikman........29
Rich Gannon.......27
Brett Favre...........22
Eli Manning..........39
B.Rothlisberger....25
J. Blake................17
J.T. O\'Sullivan......35
Michael Vick.........20
Billy Joe Tolliver...24

and last, but certainly not least....well, maybe least,

Jeff George..........10 :fanclub: :xxrotflmao: :thumbsup: :shrug: :rollinglaugh: :smile_bounce:

[Edited on 12/2/2005 by Saint_LB]

wonderlic
 

I sure miss Jeff George....you just never knew where the ball was going!!

wonderlic
 

So Marino a 14 and Young a 33. Yea, sounds accurate to me. I think this test is garbage. Mcnabb a 15 and Tolliver a 24. :xxrotflmao: Mcnair a 15.

[Edited on 12/2/2005 by FireVenturi]

wonderlic
 

It\'s not garbage - it doesn\'t test football accumen or talent, it tests essentially Intelligence Quotient. You don\'t think Steve Young is twice as smart as Marino??? You ever see the two guys talk?

wonderlic
 

Wrong again, WhoDat. We had this same discussion in the past.

Remember?

I posted an article written by Charlie Wonderlic himself.

Charlie said that the wonderlic DOES NOT measure intelligence.

It measures how well a person can accomplish a certain task in a set amount of time.

And these wonderlic tests are adjusted to measure different things acording to what they need to test for.

[Edited on 12/2/2005 by GumboBC]

wonderlic
 

The bottomline of this test, for me, is that it doesn\'t seem to measure anything useful for our discussion because of the disparity of the scores. You\'ve got great QBs with high and low scores and mediocre QBs with high and low scores.

What does this tell us?

Nothing. :casstet:

wonderlic
 

Exactly its garbage!!!!