BPA at #12 ?
 

IMHO we should pick D. However ,IF a player like Tunstil,Goff, Treadwell were there. I could see the wisdom of taking a player that is elite on Offense. With the depth at DL we could stillhet starting quality player in rds 2 and 3?

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

I hope we start with a run stopping D Lineman, there are plenty of good D Lineman available in the first round.

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

I would say yes with limits. No QB's at this spot. To much is needed on our lines to waste a pick where Drew will be the next 3 or 4 years.

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

who drops and what team reaches? not sure yet

Reed is on my list

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

With this many D-line with 1st round grades I would love for them to trade back. Nothing wrong with them going in the 20's to get another 2nd rd pick.

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

BPA at DT, Lb'er or guard.

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

Unless Tunsil or Treadwell are still on the board, I'm going defense... And I'd have to sell myself on Treadwell.

But talk about one hell of an offense. Can you imagine Coleman, Treadwell, Snead, Cooks on the field at the same time? :bng: And then throw in Fleener and :bng::bng:

Re: BPA at #12 ?
 

Always BPA, but not at an area of strength.

I'll take BPA at every position except QB, RB, FB, TE, or MLB.

But it depends how you define BPA. In my opinion an "A" prospect at an area of need should out-rank or at least equal an "A-plus" prospect at a position you're strong at.

If we have a RB graded at 96 and a pass rushing DE graded at 94, I'm fine picking the DE instead. You have to factor need into BPA.