Dt or OLB

TayTay · 03-02-2005, 07:02 PM

I've heard alot of mixed opinions about our biggest need.
Do yall feel we need a DT or OLB more?

D-buck47 · 03-02-2005, 07:10 PM

OLB more than DT, but OT the most

LordOfEntropy · 03-02-2005, 10:09 PM

You asked for opinions - so here\'s mine. LB.

I don\'t think we\'ll be a balanced team until we can get a run stuffer (and I don\'t mean just a situational player like Ruff). Know what I mean?

Until we can prove to the world otherwise, teams are just going to continue to run over us.

IMO

Euphoria · 03-02-2005, 10:38 PM

OL OL OL... the most. You have key play makers making good money to get sacked, stuffed, or not enough time to get into a route. Make us look sick or something. They need help! More time with the ball means less time our D will be on the field, making them look better already, and pray ya get some help on D and some of them DEVELOP.

oh and Aaron Brooks.

[Edited on 3/3/2005 by Euphoria]

4DSaints · 03-03-2005, 07:06 AM

OLB! We got smoked so much by teams on the outside that we received a warning from the Surgeon General!

LKelley67 · 03-03-2005, 07:39 AM

it sounds like they will sign someone to OT but are not too interested in the free agent LB market. think how bad the LBs were and subtract hodge. as poor as he was, that still ain\'t better. unless they move up for DJ, the next level of LB\'s in the draft (burnett, blackstock, thurman, etc.) are similar to watson... could be good, could play a significant role, but not a write-in starters out of the draft. when your safeties lead the team in tackles that sez one thing, where are the linebackers? not only do i see that as the weakest link but i am terribly afraid it will be the same crew with another rookie thrown in as the answer. with no DT to plug the middle yet that will still yield games having worn out emmitt smith\'s and rookie\'s running for 100+ yds. again.

baronm · 03-03-2005, 08:03 AM

I think our front office has been hanging with Rickey too long...

03-02-2005, 07:02 PM	#1
TayTay 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 118	Dt or OLB I've heard alot of mixed opinions about our biggest need. Do yall feel we need a DT or OLB more?
TayTay 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 118

03-02-2005, 07:10 PM	#2
D-buck47 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 162	Dt or OLB OLB more than DT, but OT the most
D-buck47 100th Post Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 162

03-02-2005, 10:09 PM	#3
LordOfEntropy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Cary, NC Posts: 1,838	Dt or OLB You asked for opinions - so here\'s mine. LB. I don\'t think we\'ll be a balanced team until we can get a run stuffer (and I don\'t mean just a situational player like Ruff). Know what I mean? Until we can prove to the world otherwise, teams are just going to continue to run over us. IMO

03-02-2005, 10:38 PM	#4
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Dt or OLB OL OL OL... the most. You have key play makers making good money to get sacked, stuffed, or not enough time to get into a route. Make us look sick or something. They need help! More time with the ball means less time our D will be on the field, making them look better already, and pray ya get some help on D and some of them DEVELOP. oh and Aaron Brooks. [Edited on 3/3/2005 by Euphoria]

03-03-2005, 07:06 AM	#5
4DSaints Registered Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 35	Dt or OLB OLB! We got smoked so much by teams on the outside that we received a warning from the Surgeon General!
4DSaints Registered Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 35

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-03-2005, 07:39 AM	#6
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	Dt or OLB it sounds like they will sign someone to OT but are not too interested in the free agent LB market. think how bad the LBs were and subtract hodge. as poor as he was, that still ain\'t better. unless they move up for DJ, the next level of LB\'s in the draft (burnett, blackstock, thurman, etc.) are similar to watson... could be good, could play a significant role, but not a write-in starters out of the draft. when your safeties lead the team in tackles that sez one thing, where are the linebackers? not only do i see that as the weakest link but i am terribly afraid it will be the same crew with another rookie thrown in as the answer. with no DT to plug the middle yet that will still yield games having worn out emmitt smith\'s and rookie\'s running for 100+ yds. again.

03-03-2005, 08:03 AM	#7
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	Dt or OLB I think our front office has been hanging with Rickey too long...
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954