Go Back   New Orleans Saints - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Shop Horizontal

Same old Saints?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Just a couple of weeks ago all I was hearing was "Same old Saints." Folks were saying Mayberry couldn't play RT. And they were saying FS wasn't that big of a need and that Loomis and Haslett had failed because ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2005, 06:03 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
Same old Saints?

Just a couple of weeks ago all I was hearing was "Same old Saints." Folks were saying Mayberry couldn't play RT. And they were saying FS wasn't that big of a need and that Loomis and Haslett had failed because there was no LB brought in.

Now it seems like folks have completely changed their stance. I even read where WhoDat said he was optimistic. And I've heard some of the more pessimistic folks say they are encouraged also.

But ... WHY?

Nothing has changed since then! Mayberry is still playing RT. We still don't have a LB. Haslett and Venturi are still the coaches. Sheppard is the OC. Loomis is still the GM. Brooks is still the QB.

What happened to give these pessimists hope?





[Edited on 17/3/2005 by GumboBC]
GumboBC is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 06:30 PM   #2
Got a problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 10,403
Same old Saints?

Minus Riley and Jones... add Smith, Mayberry, and a motivated Sullivan... looks improved to me. Watson, Colby, and Allen with another year of experience looks fine to me. Healthy Deuce, simplified offense (ball control), Horn still here, Bentley, Jacox, Gandy, Stallworth, Smith, Grant, McKensie, Brown, Bellamy also looks good to me. Haslett isn\'t that bad... Venturi is but hey, you can\'t win them all.

Team looks encouraging to me... hopefully, nevermind I change that, WE WILL MAKE IT TO THE PLAYOFFS!
papz is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 06:51 PM   #3
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 5,056
Blog Entries: 1
Same old Saints?

Looks like some people have seen the light, the sunlight I mean.

:soleil: :soleil: :soleil: :soleil: :soleil: :soleil: :soleil:
CheramieIII is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 07:38 PM   #4
Cold as Ice!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
Same old Saints?

i was never pessimistic, i just said that Mayberry is not a RT, which is the truth. I do like the Fs Smith and Te Meire. and if we get Dat and a 2nd??AWESOME
FireVenturi is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 08:22 PM   #5
Deuce
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,876
Same old Saints?

38 years....1 playoff win...some people are never satisfied!!
Saint_LB is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 08:23 PM   #6
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monroe, La
Posts: 209
Same old Saints?

You forgot the Biggest improvement. Removing Venturi from DC :thumbsup:
bayouking318 is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 09:09 PM   #7
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,144
Same old Saints?

All this talk about RT and an improved Sullivan got me thinking. Sullivan is not even the biggest bust we have from the University of Georgia. At least he has seen the field and made a couple of plays. Our biggest bust is none other than Stinky Stinchcomb. Is this guy ever going to play RT? Can somebody answer this for me. We drafted this guy in the second round and has not even sniffed the field of play. What kind of country is this where you can get paid to do nothing for your employer? They could have drafted me in the second round. I would have signed for a lot less and they would have gotten the same production.
stockman311 is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 10:31 PM   #8
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
Same old Saints?

My optimism is still contingent on a lot of things and was somewhat misinformed.

First, I based it in part on news that the Saints would acquire Dat Ngyuen and a 2nd from Dallas for Howard. It appears that isn\'t the case.

Second, it was based on some move I said that I would like to see in the draft, that I still realistically belive are questionable at best.

But, my stance remains unchanged.

IF the Saints get a Dat Nguyen level LB AND a 2nd in a trade for Howard.... AND

IF the Saints sign a veteran DT or draft one high... AND

IF the Saints sign Smith in the first, Webster in the 2nd, and a LB or DT with their other 2nd

THEN I will call it a very successful offseason. Why does that give me optimism? Well, the last time I think the Saints did really well in FA and the draft was 2000. They made the playoffs that year. Connection? I dunno, but it\'ll give me hope.

\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse


\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\"
he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\"
WhoDat is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 10:44 PM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
Same old Saints?

Now it seems like folks have completely changed their stance. I even read where WhoDat said he was optimistic. And I\'ve heard some of the more pessimistic folks say they are encouraged also.
We just do it to mess with you .....

Glad to see it worked ......
saintz08 is offline  
Old 03-16-2005, 11:07 PM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
Same old Saints?

aaron brooks will be mvp. he only didn\'t last year cuz of no running game, a bad offensive line, receivers dropping so many balls, bad coaching, wrong schemes for him, the defense not giving him enough opportuniites, the press biased against him, and the fans not supporting him.
LKelley67 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2013 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts