Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Reload this Page Jamal Adams at #11?

Jamal Adams at #11?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by |Mitch| Taco Charlton and Derek Barnett both should be there at #11 Should. Both of them are fine prospects and I'd be fine with either one, but Adams may be the next Ed Reed only better. Do ...

Like Tree38Likes

Reply
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2017, 06:57 PM   #11
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by |Mitch| View Post
Taco Charlton and Derek Barnett both should be there at #11
Should.

Both of them are fine prospects and I'd be fine with either one, but Adams may be the next Ed Reed only better.

Do you pass up what many consider a 10 year all-pro prospect just because of need?

Drafting for need is a huge mistake.
foreverfan likes this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 06:58 PM   #12
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by Seer1 View Post
Taco'll be a reach at eleven.
...
Sources have said that Charlton should go in the top half of the first round and has a shot at going in the top 10. He has an excellent skill set with athletic upside for the NFL. Numerous scouts have compared Charlton to Carlos Dunlap and think he could be that kind of edge defender.
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:01 PM   #13
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Should.

Both of them are fine prospects and I'd be fine with either one, but Adams may be the next Ed Reed only better.

Do you pass up what many consider a 10 year all-pro prospect just because of need?

Drafting for need is a huge mistake.
Taco Charlton could be the next JJ Watt; only better... Hindsight is always 20/20

|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:06 PM   #14
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by |Mitch| View Post
Taco Charlton could be the next JJ Watt; only better... Hindsight is always 20/20
Or he could be the next Jarvis Jones, only worse.
Seer1, Rell&Gold and rezburna like this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:10 PM   #15
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Or he could be the next Jarvis Jones, only worse.
Same could be said about Jamal Adams; Hindsight is always 20/20... No need to argue about it though, Adams won't be there at #11...
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:15 PM   #16
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Originally Posted by |Mitch| View Post
Same could be said about Jamal Adams; Hindsight is always 20/20... No need to argue about it though, Adams won't be there at #11...
Probably true Mitch, but I'd think the consensus is that Adams has a much better chance of becoming a perennial All-Pro than either Taco or Barnett.

But I'd have no problem with any of those three at #11. I'd just prefer Adams even though its not a glaring need.
voodooido likes this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:23 PM   #17
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
To me its similar to the freakish scenario of Jonathan Allen dropping to 11 (yeah I know, NFW).

Even though a stud 3-tech isn't a need for us in 2017, do you pass up what many think might be Warren Sapp talent just because you have some decent guys already on the roster?

Just food for thought. Those decisions are way above my pay grade.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:41 PM   #18
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
We are not getting any LSU players. For that to happen Sandra Bullocks would have to make Blind Side II and his dream would have to be to play for the Saints.
SmashMouth likes this.
Beastmode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:50 PM   #19
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,874
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
What about Solomon Thomas at 11? I think he will be a perfect fit as well.
Rell&Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2017, 07:53 PM   #20
12,000 BS Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 13,457
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Jamal Adams at #11?
Damn... Talk about great. He makes every freaking tackle on that video.

SmashMouth and jlouhill like this.
Last edited by foreverfan; 04-06-2017 at 06:20 AM..
foreverfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456

« Hightower signs with 49ers | From 32 to 42 »

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82284-jamal-adams-11-a.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 04-05-2017 03:36 PM 17
Jamal Adams at #11? This thread Refback 04-05-2017 03:22 PM 3
The Latest NFL News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 04-05-2017 03:08 PM 1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.

Home - Contact Us - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts